4815
Comments (693)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
599
Brucesky420 599 points ago +599 / -0

Sue every single media company that called him a white supremacist while they're at it

477
Wrexxis780 477 points ago +478 / -1

They didn't learn from Sandmann. Make them learn again.

356
MarcusAurelius 356 points ago +356 / -0

2020: Make CNN pay a defamation lawsuit again.

143
Skogin 143 points ago +143 / -0

As many as possible.

94
deleted 94 points ago +94 / -0
64
CelesteD 64 points ago +65 / -1

2 20's, 2 terms, 2 scoops, 2 defamation cases

52
Defender110 52 points ago +52 / -0

2 felony abusers dead

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
45
Redwallow2020 45 points ago +45 / -0

ESPN got in on this too! Sue their asses!!

31
BasedOnWhat 31 points ago +31 / -0

Sports can't get out of politics fast enough! Well commies gonna commie. Gotta infiltrate every corner of our culture and spoil the western identity.

11
WhatWouldTrumpDoMAGA 11 points ago +11 / -0

SPEAKING OF ESPN

Lebron spoke with OBAMAs cucked asshole about how to proceed with his boycott!!! LeCCPron was told to play on. 0bummer knows the less on tv = more eyes on Trump = more redpills

Fuck ESPN Fuck LeCCPron Fuck 0boma While I'm at, Fuck Piglosi too. Feral swine in a skin suit.

23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
17
kastmaster2000 17 points ago +17 / -0

A'hyuk!

14
Trudict 14 points ago +14 / -0

CNN can fund the very defense of the kid he's calling a white supremacist.

81
deleted 81 points ago +81 / -0
11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
43
Lunadam 43 points ago +43 / -0

They won't learn because it is Soros and chicom money. If they had to put their own personal money on the line, that would be a better lesson

19
ORD_to_SFO 19 points ago +19 / -0

Well, then let's make CNN & the media at large, the puncture wound through which we bleed Soros out; while enriching our side. A lot of little holes will take down even the largest battleship!

17
Pau1F01ey 17 points ago +17 / -0

Death By A Thousand Cuts

7
Lunadam 7 points ago +7 / -0

Rock on!!

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
3
Lunadam 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly

5
AlohaSnackbar 5 points ago +5 / -0

I agree, I'd sue the on air talent, claiming that CNN/others would never condone lying, so clearly the on air talent was doing it on their own.

More shallow pockets, but much much deeper impact.

1
Lunadam 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now we are cooking with Patriot fire!!!

3
thisguy883 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wouldnt say it didnt make a impact with Sandmann. During his speech at the RNC, CNN just let it run and went to the next speaker before they started saying shit again.

They were told to STFU when Sandmann was on. Even if they are getting Chicom money (source needed), they are still being hit hard with this crap and it will take another lawsuit where they will end up paying out big time before they stop, or at the very least, calm down.

35
digitalh3rmit 35 points ago +35 / -0

Old man CNN needs another (legal) beat down.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVxJ016xb4Q

11
kag-2020- 11 points ago +11 / -0

They don't want to learn they want to attack their political opposition. It's not like it's their money.

109
TrumpVictorious 109 points ago +109 / -0

Yep. Zero evidence of it. Slandering a minor.

46
DonnieT 46 points ago +48 / -2

What’s the deal with the possession of a dangerous weapon charge? Are minors not allowed to have an AR in Wisconsin?

41
BasteSpuds 41 points ago +41 / -0

Yeah I'm confused by that too. He has a right to bear arms. He just can't buy one from an FFL yet. He can legally be given one by his parents. Wisconsin apparently open carry is legal. Unless it's some bs like "possession of a weapon during the commission of a crime" or something.

12
FireannDireach 12 points ago +13 / -1

Open carry in WI is legal over 18.

Some are claiming an exemption, but I've yet to see proof. Not claiming they're wrong, but I can't find any exemptions in WI gun laws that would cover this.

28
Flcentipede 28 points ago +32 / -4

It is the only legitimate charge they have.

26
kag-2020- 26 points ago +28 / -2

Nope. It's an illegal law. The 2nd Amendment does not impose age restrictions. They've got nothing. Plus 948.60 only applies if you are breaking a hunting regulation. The staff running the DA's office must be full of diversity hires to manage to screw this up so badly.

7
sfluke8 7 points ago +7 / -0

WI allows rifles and shotguns for 16-17 due to hunting - hunting isn't stated in the law but it's the purpose.

22
JesusMaga 22 points ago +25 / -3

Not allowed to have dangerous weapons, which includes firearms, without being 18 or older, except there is an exception for rifles and shotguns.

34
Moose0528 34 points ago +34 / -0

Yep, only applies to pistols and short barreled rifles and shotguns. Retarded internet lawyers would have every jail in the State of Wisconsin full of 17 year olds on the first day of hunting season if their mis-reading of the statute was correct.

29
BlackCoyote 29 points ago +29 / -0

They're planning to prosecute him as an adult, but at the same time charge he's not old enough to possess the rifle.

15
pants4sasquatch 15 points ago +15 / -0

If he is trialed as an adult, shouldn't the open carry at 18+ be an exception for him then?

4
FlimboFlongins 4 points ago +4 / -0

With Valid Hunter's Safety Card. That's the Caveat.

16
RolandDelacroix 16 points ago +16 / -0

This is an add on charge used to force a plea deal. They are often found unconstitutional because no specific law was violated on its own, it's just an attempt to run up punishment for a different law.

26
Dirk_Diggler 26 points ago +26 / -0

This. It's called "candy." They pad all these charges to make a plea deal look like a bargain, when in reality it's a railroading tactic to preserve conviction rates. Basically a baseball card stat for a lawyer. It doesn't have to be right or wrong, as long as they win. Justice is a farce and if you don't have the money to spread across the whole procedure, you are fucked.

5
DonnieT 5 points ago +5 / -0

So all they really have on him is a potentially unconstitutional misdemeanor? Fight that shit.

4
boomerbutnotOKBoomer 4 points ago +4 / -0

Federal Law is age 16, Wi law is 18. it's my understanding that Federal law supersedes State Law. Then again, the Constitution states - SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED, which supersedes all of it.

And don't forget this wonderful gem that i'm sure will be used a lot in the coming year - Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law -- https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law

bottom line - we all have a God Given Right to Self Defense.

*Libtards are all triggered because one of the dudes got it in the head. "ooooh headshot is illegal!!" Yeah - no it isn't. Maybe in Call of Duty or GTA, but this is real life you wing nut! aaaaaarrrrrghghgh *

35
deleted 35 points ago +35 / -0
11
1776-or-1984 11 points ago +11 / -0

Gofundme polled the plug on Kyles donation page.

21
The_Litehaus_Abides 21 points ago +21 / -0

GoFundMe needs to be busted for money laundering, big league. They always close the accounts of good people while leaving open -- and raking in millions for -- pieces of shit like Blasey-Ford.

5
sgt_richard 5 points ago +5 / -0

RICO

3
1776-or-1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

This

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
4
CelesteD 4 points ago +4 / -0

He means the ones set up for the criminals, which I believe are still active.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
6
ignorant_slob 6 points ago +6 / -0

Definitely need to sue and get an injunction so that money doesn’t go anywhere. Hard to recover funds from pimps and drug dealers that this kind of windfall inevitably gets blown on.

6
SDhiker 6 points ago +7 / -1

Nah, their "estates" likely consist of a box kiddy porn

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
Sodium_miner 3 points ago +3 / -0

I like that idea. 👍🏼

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
17
booblitchutz 17 points ago +17 / -0

And Ayannah Pressley

14
Fuck_commies_2024 14 points ago +14 / -0

That bald headed cunt!

5
StillplayenSometimes 5 points ago +5 / -0

The one at slate "The Conservative Defense of Kyle Rittenhouse Is Dangerous Nonsense" gets me the angriest

4
LastNameNull 4 points ago +4 / -0

You are not kidding. Just looked it up and read that rage inducing pile of journalistic vomit. I knew it was going to be a tough read after the second sentence: "Videos of the event tell us an incomplete story of what, exactly, happened that night." The video of "shoot me nigga" dude being the aggressor not clear enough? Actively retreating from the lynch mob yelling "get his ass" makes him a threat? The author then wants you to suspend your belief in the reality you have just witnessed and buy into the notion the mob were the "diverse group of good guys". And then does an epic mental gymnastic dismount by making it a white vs black issue. Truly rage inducing.