Nope. It's an illegal law. The 2nd Amendment does not impose age restrictions. They've got nothing. Plus 948.60 only applies if you are breaking a hunting regulation. The staff running the DA's office must be full of diversity hires to manage to screw this up so badly.
That's my take. If it gets it thrown out, all these unconstitutional laws that keep our children from protecting themselves are tossed as well. The Communists played themselves.
That doesn't sound plausible. Age restrictions on carrying will be upheld by every court in the US. Unless he has a WI hunting license, I don't see how he is not in violation of the statute. Probably have to pay a fine or something.
He's from Illinois I thought. Wonder how that will fly. Did he carry across state lines? Will these morons (who should be prosecuting real criminals) really try to stretch that? Well, they'll have a lot of court time ahead of them.
Law was MEANT for hunting. It wasn't WRITTEN for hunting. It was written so that 16 and 17 year olds can carry only long guns. Huge difference, since the AR he was carrying is classed as a long gun.
It is the only legitimate charge they have.
Nope. It's an illegal law. The 2nd Amendment does not impose age restrictions. They've got nothing. Plus 948.60 only applies if you are breaking a hunting regulation. The staff running the DA's office must be full of diversity hires to manage to screw this up so badly.
jesus christ, imagine if this kid gets that law thrown out on constitutional grounds. They'll be statues of him
That's my take. If it gets it thrown out, all these unconstitutional laws that keep our children from protecting themselves are tossed as well. The Communists played themselves.
John Roberts will fuck it up somehow.
stops positioning statue platform on back lawn
"Will be statues?"
Holy Music Stops
Say if GOA really puts some muscle behind him like I think they would.
Well, after this year, I think we have room.
That doesn't sound plausible. Age restrictions on carrying will be upheld by every court in the US. Unless he has a WI hunting license, I don't see how he is not in violation of the statute. Probably have to pay a fine or something.
He's from Illinois I thought. Wonder how that will fly. Did he carry across state lines? Will these morons (who should be prosecuting real criminals) really try to stretch that? Well, they'll have a lot of court time ahead of them.
PERSONALLY, I WANT TO SEE THE COURTS FLOODED WITH DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS, FAILURE TO PROTECT, DITCHING THEIR OATH OF OFFICE, AND anything else we can find to sue these asswipe Libtards back to the stone age. And we need to cut Soros off. A lot of his funding comes from we the taxpayer! https://www.charismanews.com/politics/opinion/65870-why-are-u-s-taxpayers-funding-george-soros-philanthropy
The Constitution is the Supreme law of the land.
The feds aren't charging him. The state of Wisconsin is.
WI allows rifles and shotguns for 16-17 due to hunting - hunting isn't stated in the law but it's the purpose.
He was hunting?
THIN OUT THEIR NUMBERS ...boom instant conservationist
Yeah, he bagged out!
Apparently he was hunting commies-he just didn't know it at the time =).
Hunting pedos
Law was MEANT for hunting. It wasn't WRITTEN for hunting. It was written so that 16 and 17 year olds can carry only long guns. Huge difference, since the AR he was carrying is classed as a long gun.