It was more the point. So if our military has to go to war with China, Russia, and Middle Eastern guerrilla fighters, do you think that's good news while we all engage in civil war?
Don't presume to know what I think. You don't know me.
I expect the military to do its job and defend the Constitution as written. Hell, an invading force could prove to end the civil war quicker as there is a significant chance that both sides having a common enemy would unite the country faster.
It was more the point. So if our military has to go to war with China, Russia, and Middle Eastern guerrilla fighters, do you think that's good news while we all engage in civil war?
I thought not.
Don't presume to know what I think. You don't know me.
I expect the military to do its job and defend the Constitution as written. Hell, an invading force could prove to end the civil war quicker as there is a significant chance that both sides having a common enemy would unite the country faster.
So we should engage in civil war to bring us all together? Sounds like a steep and unnecessary path to follow.
No, I think I'll stick with violence as a last resort. Or at least wholesale violence, anyway.