This is the "might makes right" argument. It is the argument of tyrants, statists and anarchists. You are saying, only if I am strong enough to defend the right does it exist. This is getting the cart before the horse. There is only one outcome from this point of view, and it is violence, death, and destruction. the end game is brutes like you smacking people who know better in the head with a rock. All tech would be gone from your dumbass. Good thing we have the 2A, We don't have to pretend your simple ass has any say :) Knuckle dragging mouth breather, that's what you are.
You are incredibly ignorant. Literally everything you said is wrong. Rights exist because humans have decided that they are beneficial to society. You have a right to bear arms NOT because God said so. God said “thou shalt not kill.” You have a right to bear arms because it’s necessary for a well regulated militia, and because it’s important for self defense against criminals too. You have freedom of religion NOT because God gave it to you. God tells you to be Christian. The United States doesn’t. You have it because not allowing freedom of religion leads to massacres. I’m not saying rights are WRONG you fucking dimwit. I’m saying they exist by mutual agreement among individuals in the interest of a strong and functional communal society. And if other humans decided the right shouldn’t exist, and remove it, then it would only exist for you to the extent you can stop others from infringing it. You can play the Hitler card like a moron all you want, and I’m sure you will, the moron that you are, it won’t stop it from being true. I’m not saying you should be killed. I’m explaining to you the reality of rights. Why and how they exist. People misunderstand rights, and when someone says someone shouldn’t do X people often respond that they have a RIGHT to do X. That’s a nonsense response. A “right” is something people decided you SHOULD be able to do. Saying someone shouldn’t be able to do something is to argue against the right. To counter argue with “but they have a right” is no counter at all. That’s why understanding rights is important.
You are a relativist. Inalienable rights do not give any fucks about your opinion of where they come from, and if they are defended or not. That's in the definition (a tautology, that means " a statement that is true by necessity or by virtue of its logical form", you mouth breathing rube) If there is only consensus, or intersubjectivity, then democrats are right, mob rules wins, always. So again, fuck off lefty.
Reality doesn’t give a fuck about your claim to “inalienability.” I’m not a relativist. I believe certain rights are good, because the do create a strong society. But our society is full of psychos. If the mob takes over the country, goodbye freedom of speech. We will see how “inalienable” it really is.
You repeat yourself. I have to accept your position cause you say so. I say no, I do not. You are projecting. Psst, this over the internet discourse really shows what I mean. You cannot shut me up because you "wahnuue" (wipe that tear child). You also cannot shut me up because your knuckle dragging ass implies physical violence will Trump my argument. Because it doesn't. You are a relativist, might makes right, half-wit dipshit. I already whipped yer ass so pocket your pride and move on asshole, this is a dead thread.
This is the "might makes right" argument. It is the argument of tyrants, statists and anarchists. You are saying, only if I am strong enough to defend the right does it exist. This is getting the cart before the horse. There is only one outcome from this point of view, and it is violence, death, and destruction. the end game is brutes like you smacking people who know better in the head with a rock. All tech would be gone from your dumbass. Good thing we have the 2A, We don't have to pretend your simple ass has any say :) Knuckle dragging mouth breather, that's what you are.
You are incredibly ignorant. Literally everything you said is wrong. Rights exist because humans have decided that they are beneficial to society. You have a right to bear arms NOT because God said so. God said “thou shalt not kill.” You have a right to bear arms because it’s necessary for a well regulated militia, and because it’s important for self defense against criminals too. You have freedom of religion NOT because God gave it to you. God tells you to be Christian. The United States doesn’t. You have it because not allowing freedom of religion leads to massacres. I’m not saying rights are WRONG you fucking dimwit. I’m saying they exist by mutual agreement among individuals in the interest of a strong and functional communal society. And if other humans decided the right shouldn’t exist, and remove it, then it would only exist for you to the extent you can stop others from infringing it. You can play the Hitler card like a moron all you want, and I’m sure you will, the moron that you are, it won’t stop it from being true. I’m not saying you should be killed. I’m explaining to you the reality of rights. Why and how they exist. People misunderstand rights, and when someone says someone shouldn’t do X people often respond that they have a RIGHT to do X. That’s a nonsense response. A “right” is something people decided you SHOULD be able to do. Saying someone shouldn’t be able to do something is to argue against the right. To counter argue with “but they have a right” is no counter at all. That’s why understanding rights is important.
You are a relativist. Inalienable rights do not give any fucks about your opinion of where they come from, and if they are defended or not. That's in the definition (a tautology, that means " a statement that is true by necessity or by virtue of its logical form", you mouth breathing rube) If there is only consensus, or intersubjectivity, then democrats are right, mob rules wins, always. So again, fuck off lefty.
Reality doesn’t give a fuck about your claim to “inalienability.” I’m not a relativist. I believe certain rights are good, because the do create a strong society. But our society is full of psychos. If the mob takes over the country, goodbye freedom of speech. We will see how “inalienable” it really is.
you suck at definitions.
I’m not a lefty, I’m just not a moron. I actually understand concepts. You’re just some high school dropout
You repeat yourself. I have to accept your position cause you say so. I say no, I do not. You are projecting. Psst, this over the internet discourse really shows what I mean. You cannot shut me up because you "wahnuue" (wipe that tear child). You also cannot shut me up because your knuckle dragging ass implies physical violence will Trump my argument. Because it doesn't. You are a relativist, might makes right, half-wit dipshit. I already whipped yer ass so pocket your pride and move on asshole, this is a dead thread.