There's at least one error: his claim that a "certificate of accomplishment" was needed by Kyle. That's only required for under 16. It's not required for 17.
And the money to pay for great security. But I'm going to hope that the left does what it usually does and forgets about him as it goes on with the latest sparkly source of rage.
I gotta say, Kyle’s awareness in the throes of the situation and ability to neutralize the actual threats and not blindly shoot, risking potential harm to bystanders, is impressive. He’s a good example of some of the arbitrariness of some laws tied to an age.
This is a great breakdown.
Agreed, video saved.
Yup! It goes in my external HD archives.
There's at least one error: his claim that a "certificate of accomplishment" was needed by Kyle. That's only required for under 16. It's not required for 17.
Here's the law. See 948.60(b)(3):
https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/948/60
Then, follow the links to 29.304. It only applies to under 16.
Now, follow the links to 29.593. That only requires a certificate for hunting.
29.304 has restrictions on possession or control of a firearm and restrictions on hunting, for people under 16.
But, 29.593 only has restrictions on hunting, for age 16 and 17.
Poor kid is going to have a target on his back for the rest of his life.
And the money to pay for great security. But I'm going to hope that the left does what it usually does and forgets about him as it goes on with the latest sparkly source of rage.
Tell that to Jason Zimmerman.
I gotta say, Kyle’s awareness in the throes of the situation and ability to neutralize the actual threats and not blindly shoot, risking potential harm to bystanders, is impressive. He’s a good example of some of the arbitrariness of some laws tied to an age.