Just start being a preacher. I say all kinds of "crazy" stuff now because I stopped giving a fuck, and you'd be surprised how quickly it snaps some people out of their daze. Sure, there are true believers that will never change, but most people have only heard the opinions spouted in the MSM, and once they hear something different they start thinking for themselves.
This is the biggest misconception of all. The second amendment doesn’t give you the right to bear arms, it expressly forbids the government from infringing on your NATURAL right to do so. Thereby, any gun law is a constitutional violation.
I read two articles in as many days basically titled "Good news everyone! Some institution prevented a major outbreak of covid by using science!"
Both articles assumed there would actually be an outbreak, and that dozens or hundreds of lives would be saved. It doesn't matter though -- they got what they wanted: Ad revenue and a forum for Karens to whine about people who don't wear masks and to whine about the president doing a bad job while giving governors and mayors and the CDC a free pass.
Point taken, but do remember: "Karen" is an anti-white slur. Always do thought experiments - what if a black lady acted all bitchy and you called her "Shaniqua"? Your life would be over.
"Karen" is a way to spread hate against white women. Don't use their language!
Karen has nothing to do with race. It's about the behavior. Don't let the left appropriate that. Kinda like how straight people can act like faggots. It's about the behaviors of the person.
Hey Shaniqua, What about Becky? That was definitely a slur against white women and still is. As in Becky with the good hair. BBQ Becky. Omg Becky look at her butt.
Becky is the ‘slur‘ gay guys use for annoying straight girls who need to ruin everything by going places they are tolerated but not welcome to and abusing any semblance of welcome by being obnoxious. It’s both funny and great to see the straights finally catch up to us, though I find it funny they settled on Karen.
I disagree - everyone I know uses Karen for any woman (and most cases of dudes acting like a Karen). To answer that first comment, though, I will use Shaniqua or Boqueesha or simply hoodrat... my life hasn't been cancelled yet.
Look! There's a Karen down-voting your comment right now! xD Wasn't me! Also, the male one's should all be called Spez if you don't want to just call them Karen.
It might have started on the left as a bit of racist slur against white women. If they were being honest though its their own base of Hillary / Warren supporters that make up the most famous "Karens". Its definitely more useful for us to call out this behavior.
The Karenwaffen is every single person on the European Political Axis from "Use Companies to Control People" to "Just Control People Directly."
The Karens love the control.
The Karens are precisely the 4% of Republicans that are more twitterpated by their loss of control of the Party and "The Tone" than they are fighting for Freedom.
Trump fundamentally drove off the usual political axis.
I had to wear a mask this past week for the first time and it was EMBARASSING, despite everyone else doing it too. It's just SO FUCKING DUMB.
I had to fly for the first time in 9 months (they won't even let you approach an aircraft without a mask) and I had to work on a site where our customer required it, so I wore an American flag neck gaiter thing the entire time...Couldn't find a Trump mask; but I saw one guy in the airport with a MAGA mask and KAG hat and gave him the thumbs up!
Anyway yeah, it's a joke and as soon as I landed at my home destination I took my mask off and they were like "Sir, mask!" and I said "Or what, you'll kick me off the flight?" and that was pretty lulzy. I may now be banned from United, who knows.
I also did a lot of this. I went and bought drinks (large size) with straws every stop, and then just sat there with my mask off while drinking.
It's still amazing how many people look at you like you're the weirdo for not having a mask on. I used to fly monthly/bi-weekly and if I saw someone with a mask a year ago, THEY were the fucking weirdo.
Our state EO has several exceptions. No one is allowed to ask what your exception is since many are medically related. You could play that one 9 ways to Sunday but since I conceal carry everywhere, my personal favorite exception is the one for operating equipment.
People driving alone in their car wearing a mask - that is my #1 "holy shit this person is a fucking automaton" criteria. As soon as I see that, it's like screaming out you have downs syndrome but are far dumber.
I've done everything I can to avoid putting on the coward's mask. I work independently. I haven't needed to put on one of those things yet. I came close when a shipment got held up at the post office, but I still didn't need to put one on. Protesting the mask is THE most important protest anyone could carry on today, because it's a broad-sweeping and very personal attack on human rights. As you can see, the mask nazis are pleased to give up your rights for you: "It's just a mask! PUT ON YOUR MASK!!!" Nope! If you don't control your own face, you control nothing. They can do ANYTHING they want to you after that.
Agreed. I didn't do it this past week to selfishly keep my job; I did it because i like my job and didn't want to put my boss in a bad place. He also thinks it is absolute bullshit, but said it's a must; because it's a new customer and we're trying to make a good impression or whatever,. We're trying to gain business, not make statements. So, I did what I had to do.
That said, I'm home now. No more mask. I went in to pick up my truck from getting work done (fucking HAIL!) and didn't wear a mask and no one said shit, and it was all good. If they had, I'd have told them to eat my cock with extra mayo. Granted, I live in rural America, but...I'd still have done it if I didn't. I am so sick of these fucking tyrants and their little flunkies.
Drive Thrus that ask for you to be wearing one are hilarious to. No one does where I am except the Karens and I am in a shitblue county. One guy thats been working one of them for a few years recognizes me, im like I need to put this fucking thing on, nope just give me your money.
The masks do two things and neither of them are preventing the spread of a virus:
-The masks serve as a constantly-present protest banner, used to remind the normies that something is wrong during mean orange man's presidency.
-The masks give users an entirely FALSE sense of security, INCREASING the spread of a virus through the resulting behavior (please see: "three months of record-breaking [protests]" for more information).
And if you break one of these illegal laws, they are still going to charge you. The average Joe doesn’t have the money or time to fight this shit. They know what they’re doing, it’s calculated beyond measure.
Nope, have no idea about that and is bullshit, why? I was meaning felons, and even that is a stretch sometimes, but I do believe some people should never be allowed to touch a gun, depends.
Our Constitution is currently Swiss cheese. It is basically illegal to have a communist party or any law that violates the constitution, yet here we are.
In america you are free to do what you want, except subvert the foundation of the nation. Hence, it's ok to burn any flag you want but an american one, because nowhere else would you have this freedom
Even speech we disagree with is free speech; don't be a hypocrite.
Censorship is for leftists, not for freedom-loving Americans. When you censor people, you only make their movement stronger and give them justification for claiming to be oppressed.
Let's attack communism and socialism using different, more convincing, more consistent, and frankly more moral means. Trust me, giving up free speech won't convince more people to become red-pilled. Only by red-pilling a vast majority of the population can we defeat communism and socialism.
Instead of becoming like big-tech, let's be reasonable people who point out the many problems with socialism and communism while showing that our side is the side of reason and free speech. If our side gives up free speech, nobody will be left who will defend it, surely turning the debate of ideas into "whoever is in power tells people what they can and can't say".
Communism and socialist are not so much a system of government as they are an insidious means of creating a sociopolitical climate in which advocates see the only means of resolving the situation is the dissolution. Socialist or Communist acting under any assumed party name do not seem to have the protections of the Constitution.
We are currently in a situation where either of the three following could be used.
Communist Control Act
§842. Proscription of Communist Party, its successors, and subsidiary organizations
The Communist Party of the United States, or any successors of such party regardless of the assumed name, whose object or purpose is to overthrow the Government of the United States, or the government of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein by force and violence, are not entitled to any of the rights, privileges, and immunities attendant upon legal bodies created under the jurisdiction of the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof; and whatever rights, privileges, and immunities which have heretofore been granted to said party or any subsidiary organization by reason of the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof, are terminated: Provided, however, That nothing in this section shall be construed as amending the Internal Security Act of 1950, as amended [50 U.S.C. 781 et seq.]
The Hatch Act, because communism/socialism operates essentially like a criminal organization, this was meant to prevent rank and file employees from using their positional power to influence elections. CNN likes to cite the act incorrectly, attributing it to appointees which are not rank and file. We have seen numerous charges laid against individuals who are cannot endorse candidates, and are working for the government towards an end to affect the election. The specific part;
§1502. Influencing elections; taking part in political campaigns; prohibitions; exceptions
(a) A State or local officer or employee may not—
(1) use his official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an election or a nomination for office;
(2) directly or indirectly coerce, attempt to coerce, command, or advise a State or local officer or employee to pay, lend, or contribute anything of value to a party, committee, organization, agency, or person for political purposes; or
(3) if the salary of the employee is paid completely, directly or indirectly, by loans or grants made by the United States or a Federal agency, be a candidate for elective office.
(b) A State or local officer or employee retains the right to vote as he chooses and to express his opinions on political subjects and candidates.
(c) Subsection (a)(3) of this section does not apply to—
(1) the Governor or Lieutenant Governor of a State or an individual authorized by law to act as Governor;
(2) the mayor of a city;
(3) a duly elected head of an executive department of a State, municipality, or the District of Columbia who is not classified under a State, municipal, or the District of Columbia merit or civil-service system; or
Whenever there is an insurrection in any State against its government, the President may, upon the request of its legislature or of its governor if the legislature cannot be convened, call into Federal service such of the militia of the other States, in the number requested by that State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to suppress the insurrection.
(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 15, §331; renumbered §251, Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XII, §1241(a)(2), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2497.)
The problem is that they are brazen enough to mandate unconstitutional “laws” anyway. Then fine and/or arrest you. And basically bully you in general. What is your recourse? To sue the state months or years later? They don’t care.
I think most of them are rioting because they’re idiots who just want to cause mayhem and get free stuff, but there’s probably also a small minority who are doing it because of unjust laws.
...🤔main reason Trump told the governors they could handle their own state decisions on the Covid 19 was to expose which governors were not Constitution based I believe.
I don't think it was 4D chess to expose them; I think he really expected the states and cities to handle their own issues as he offered his help to remove barriers. It's not for the president to micromanage all fifty states; that's an impossible task. I don't understand how people can think a president, even GEOTUS, can do that.
I think it was simply just to expose how shit our political system is. Why the fuck does the POTUS need to step in when something is happening in a random city in this country? Where is the mayor? The governor? State senators and house reps?
The fact that Trump is being blamed for situation on a city scale shows me just how incompetent all those politicians are. I do not think the left realizes that by criticizing Trump for these things, they are saying that every single level of government below Trump has failed spectacularly.
In my opinion the federal government should only manage the military and a couple other national services, there is absolutely zero reason for the POTUS to be as powerful as he is. Why does a guy in DC have influence over what happens thousands of miles away? Why don't we give these powers back to states and counties? If there are people who want UBI and taxpayer funded healthcare and illegal immigrants, let them. Fuck it, this is America, if you want to be retarded and destroy your own community you should learn your lesson the hard way without forcing it onto 330 million other people.
Why can't we have communist, fascist, libertarian, etc states all under America? Let people be governed how they want. Leave it to the states. Federal should be military and few other things, you're correct.
Whether or not it was 4D chess (it was), the situation still revealed the politicians who would happily run counter to the Constitution and those who would uphold it.
The Constitution doesn't exist to the radical left. That's why they are working so hard at unconstitutional actions, if there are no consequences to being unconstitutional, it's unnecessary and easier to throw away, change and start over with a socialist platform.
Imagine an 18 year old knowing what the word "infringed" means, but after a university education they are no longer sure of the meaning b/c it's "complicated".
I triggered a leftist pretty hard once without even trying in a chat room. They were saying something about Nazis causing some problem somewhere in the city, and I replied that the Nazi party was disbanded after WW2. They responded with "NEO-NAZI!" and posted a Wikipedia link to "neo-nazi" in chat, followed by a rant about how they're everywhere.
I've only lived here a few years but I don't remember seeing any neo-nazi parades, neo-nazi gangs causing havoc downtown, nazi flags on any signs or houses, or anyone giving nazi salutes anywhere.
And the constitution and Bill of Rights is there to protect AGAINST the governments infringement on un-alienable, god given rights. It does not grant rights. It protects those rights.
Violent revolution is made inevitable because they make peaceful revolution impossible. Note here that revolution means simply returning to the legal law of the land and a return to freedom. What a crazy thought.
Now if we can get some republican lawyers to get off their asses and start suing we will be doing something. The gym owner in New Jersey should be first in line.
It's true, but sadly the only way that the end-runs around the Constitution known as "codes" and "statutes" created by lawyers and politicians will ever be nullified is when police actually know the basis of the laws they are enforcing. They need the knowledge and support to be able to refuse to enforce unlawful policies. I support and respect police, and understand the very real need for them, but it seems that due to corruption and lack of training in actual law they have been rendered almost equivalent to mob enforcers. A lot of sheriffs seem to get it, as many stated they would not enforce mask edicts. It would be nice if LEOs got back to being Peacekeepers, instead of "policy enforcers" for tyrants. A good start would be to make police chiefs elected, like Sheriffs instead of appointed by mayors. That way they would be working for us.
Michigan failed in its lawsuit. The court decided that the State Constitution beat out any claim of violation of THE Constitution. They also claimed some out of date law from WWII or something somehow grants Whitmer the right to emergency powers to violate the Constitution under the (BS) claim of public necessity. I'm glad two states managed to gain their freedom back. This just highlighted how corrupt Michigan courts are.
The prostate story backs up why I refuse to go to a doctor unless I NEED to. I'm female and the medical profession has been forcing pelvic and pap exams on women for decades. They do virtually nothing, if not nothing, for asymptomatic individuals, yet we're bullied, coerced, and blackmailed into submitting (they won't give us treatment/meds for our REAL problems unless we submit). I'd never heard of a patient (male or female) being physically attacked like that. I hope he sued for more than just machismo violation, include rape in there too because that's what it was. They don't get a different term for it just because it was medical professionals who did it, it wasn't just "forced medical examination" either.
This is so good. Notice Reagan said the feds should be protecting peoples constitutional rights. It's a shame the feds have never been actually used to come in and enforce constitutional rights like the 2nd.
Great interview! It’s a weird artefact of human society and economics that the answer is almost invariably ‘free markets’, but that notion can always be attacked by asking for specifics about how that might work, for that is unknowable, so the answer must come down to ‘I don’t know, it just works’. Whereas, someone proposing regulatory measures can always claim superior understanding because they only need to explain how their measure works in the limited context of their system of rules.
Hint, hint state governors with endless "Emergency Powers". the laws you are using to wield your dictatorship are illegal
Preach it!
Sorry, can you yell it louder? I'm trapped behind enemy lines, surrounded by screeching Branch Covidians. :(
Just start being a preacher. I say all kinds of "crazy" stuff now because I stopped giving a fuck, and you'd be surprised how quickly it snaps some people out of their daze. Sure, there are true believers that will never change, but most people have only heard the opinions spouted in the MSM, and once they hear something different they start thinking for themselves.
LAW OF THE LAND!
This is the biggest misconception of all. The second amendment doesn’t give you the right to bear arms, it expressly forbids the government from infringing on your NATURAL right to do so. Thereby, any gun law is a constitutional violation.
Nice username
reeee, masks help prevent the spread of disease among non-disease carriers. stop denying science, bigot
I read two articles in as many days basically titled "Good news everyone! Some institution prevented a major outbreak of covid by using science!"
Both articles assumed there would actually be an outbreak, and that dozens or hundreds of lives would be saved. It doesn't matter though -- they got what they wanted: Ad revenue and a forum for Karens to whine about people who don't wear masks and to whine about the president doing a bad job while giving governors and mayors and the CDC a free pass.
Point taken, but do remember: "Karen" is an anti-white slur. Always do thought experiments - what if a black lady acted all bitchy and you called her "Shaniqua"? Your life would be over.
"Karen" is a way to spread hate against white women. Don't use their language!
Karen has nothing to do with race. It's about the behavior. Don't let the left appropriate that. Kinda like how straight people can act like faggots. It's about the behaviors of the person.
Wait...you mean you're judging people by their behavior and not by the color of their skin? How does that work?
/s
Yup, what a concept.
Hey Shaniqua, What about Becky? That was definitely a slur against white women and still is. As in Becky with the good hair. BBQ Becky. Omg Becky look at her butt.
I had a GF once named Becky... She was nice and would've made a great wife.
Think I found her.
Becky is the ‘slur‘ gay guys use for annoying straight girls who need to ruin everything by going places they are tolerated but not welcome to and abusing any semblance of welcome by being obnoxious. It’s both funny and great to see the straights finally catch up to us, though I find it funny they settled on Karen.
If it was JUST the behavior, it wouldn't be a traditionally white name.
I agree; it's the behavior...but for them, it's more about the race IMO. They don't call black bitches "karen"...for a reason.
I disagree - everyone I know uses Karen for any woman (and most cases of dudes acting like a Karen). To answer that first comment, though, I will use Shaniqua or Boqueesha or simply hoodrat... my life hasn't been cancelled yet.
There are definately black Karens... of both genders.
Yes, and they should be called SHANIQUA'S! Fair is fair!
What about LaKiesha?
Look! There's a Karen down-voting your comment right now! xD Wasn't me! Also, the male one's should all be called Spez if you don't want to just call them Karen.
Meh, let 'em downvote. They simply don't understand leftist tactics.
It might have started on the left as a bit of racist slur against white women. If they were being honest though its their own base of Hillary / Warren supporters that make up the most famous "Karens". Its definitely more useful for us to call out this behavior.
"Don't use their language!" CO-OPT their language and immediately use it against them!
The Karenwaffen is every single person on the European Political Axis from "Use Companies to Control People" to "Just Control People Directly."
The Karens love the control.
The Karens are precisely the 4% of Republicans that are more twitterpated by their loss of control of the Party and "The Tone" than they are fighting for Freedom.
Trump fundamentally drove off the usual political axis.
See this really gets me because my school district is sTrICtlY eNfOrCinG but they’ve also allegedly had 7 cases.
It's bullshittery.
I had to wear a mask this past week for the first time and it was EMBARASSING, despite everyone else doing it too. It's just SO FUCKING DUMB.
I had to fly for the first time in 9 months (they won't even let you approach an aircraft without a mask) and I had to work on a site where our customer required it, so I wore an American flag neck gaiter thing the entire time...Couldn't find a Trump mask; but I saw one guy in the airport with a MAGA mask and KAG hat and gave him the thumbs up!
Anyway yeah, it's a joke and as soon as I landed at my home destination I took my mask off and they were like "Sir, mask!" and I said "Or what, you'll kick me off the flight?" and that was pretty lulzy. I may now be banned from United, who knows.
I just keep a bottle of water nearby as a prop. I'm drinking water, fuck off Karen
I also did a lot of this. I went and bought drinks (large size) with straws every stop, and then just sat there with my mask off while drinking.
It's still amazing how many people look at you like you're the weirdo for not having a mask on. I used to fly monthly/bi-weekly and if I saw someone with a mask a year ago, THEY were the fucking weirdo.
Tangentially related, pretty much every bank requires you to put on a mask before coming in.
HONK HONK
Lmao, a couple years ago I entered a bank with sunglasses on and they threw a fucking fit.
A nearby water bottle is an excellent Karen deterrent.
Our state EO has several exceptions. No one is allowed to ask what your exception is since many are medically related. You could play that one 9 ways to Sunday but since I conceal carry everywhere, my personal favorite exception is the one for operating equipment.
People driving alone in their car wearing a mask - that is my #1 "holy shit this person is a fucking automaton" criteria. As soon as I see that, it's like screaming out you have downs syndrome but are far dumber.
My favorites are the ones that wear the disposable gloves but then also touch their phone.
Not understanding cross-contamination has been the #1 contributor to covid, and the "experts" love and know it.
I Wear My Face Mask in the Car
To the tune of I Wear Sunglasses at Night.
This one always cracks me up and I make sure to try and make eye contact with them and laugh.
I honk honk at them, and then flip them off
I've done everything I can to avoid putting on the coward's mask. I work independently. I haven't needed to put on one of those things yet. I came close when a shipment got held up at the post office, but I still didn't need to put one on. Protesting the mask is THE most important protest anyone could carry on today, because it's a broad-sweeping and very personal attack on human rights. As you can see, the mask nazis are pleased to give up your rights for you: "It's just a mask! PUT ON YOUR MASK!!!" Nope! If you don't control your own face, you control nothing. They can do ANYTHING they want to you after that.
Agreed. I didn't do it this past week to selfishly keep my job; I did it because i like my job and didn't want to put my boss in a bad place. He also thinks it is absolute bullshit, but said it's a must; because it's a new customer and we're trying to make a good impression or whatever,. We're trying to gain business, not make statements. So, I did what I had to do.
That said, I'm home now. No more mask. I went in to pick up my truck from getting work done (fucking HAIL!) and didn't wear a mask and no one said shit, and it was all good. If they had, I'd have told them to eat my cock with extra mayo. Granted, I live in rural America, but...I'd still have done it if I didn't. I am so sick of these fucking tyrants and their little flunkies.
Glad you're pushing back. Thank you.
Ah, man, I totally understand. Every time a job is lost or a shop closes up, the degenerate Marxist fucks win a little.
Drive Thrus that ask for you to be wearing one are hilarious to. No one does where I am except the Karens and I am in a shitblue county. One guy thats been working one of them for a few years recognizes me, im like I need to put this fucking thing on, nope just give me your money.
The masks do two things and neither of them are preventing the spread of a virus:
-The masks serve as a constantly-present protest banner, used to remind the normies that something is wrong during mean orange man's presidency.
-The masks give users an entirely FALSE sense of security, INCREASING the spread of a virus through the resulting behavior (please see: "three months of record-breaking [protests]" for more information).
..edicts, decrees and executive orders, that go against the Constitution are NULL AND VOID.
These police officers need to get this fucking memo
Don't vote for a politician that will appoint a Tranny Health Director.
We can take it a step farther. Don't be neighbors with people that will vote for a politician that will appoint a tranny health director.
I just put a huge Trump flag up to prevent them from buying. I don't move because of leftist.
So what can be done? How do we protect our constitutional rights?
If they can do it in broad daylight and never face even an attempt at repercussions then “illegal” is just a mere verbalism.
And if you break one of these illegal laws, they are still going to charge you. The average Joe doesn’t have the money or time to fight this shit. They know what they’re doing, it’s calculated beyond measure.
Shall not be infringed!
The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed!
Didn't you notice the asterick where it says "Unless muh safety and feels"?
So what if you get arrested for "illegally" possessing guns?
Serious question...
Fight it in court. Most of these people don't have the money to battle a government agency, though.
You would be breaking the law for the reason you aren't allowed to possess them. Valid
Nope, have no idea about that and is bullshit, why? I was meaning felons, and even that is a stretch sometimes, but I do believe some people should never be allowed to touch a gun, depends.
If we hung felons (after a fair trial of their peers), we wouldn't have to mull over which rights to restrict.
Welp, there goes half of California's laws.
Half of John Roberts rulings too.
OPEN OUR CHURCHES
Open them ourselves!
Get yourself some bolt cutters.
Unfortunately, they never seem to get fought in court.
The only way it gets fought in court is mass public non-compliance and then fighting the charges at risko of jail.
Civil disobedience could work with enough people willing to risk their freedom and some great lawyers willing to work for little to nothing.
Or it could start snowing in San Diego and we could build a snowman or a big igloo.
Open our country!
Open carry in our country
Open carry in our open country
If you can lift it, you can carry it. (Howitzer Cannons for the stronger patriots)
National Cannon Association needs to happen.
What is a cannon if not a giant rifle?
Also, love your name, fellow Ruski bot!
Our Constitution is currently Swiss cheese. It is basically illegal to have a communist party or any law that violates the constitution, yet here we are.
In america you are free to do what you want, except subvert the foundation of the nation. Hence, it's ok to burn any flag you want but an american one, because nowhere else would you have this freedom
Even speech we disagree with is free speech; don't be a hypocrite.
Censorship is for leftists, not for freedom-loving Americans. When you censor people, you only make their movement stronger and give them justification for claiming to be oppressed.
Let's attack communism and socialism using different, more convincing, more consistent, and frankly more moral means. Trust me, giving up free speech won't convince more people to become red-pilled. Only by red-pilling a vast majority of the population can we defeat communism and socialism.
Instead of becoming like big-tech, let's be reasonable people who point out the many problems with socialism and communism while showing that our side is the side of reason and free speech. If our side gives up free speech, nobody will be left who will defend it, surely turning the debate of ideas into "whoever is in power tells people what they can and can't say".
Communism and socialist are not so much a system of government as they are an insidious means of creating a sociopolitical climate in which advocates see the only means of resolving the situation is the dissolution. Socialist or Communist acting under any assumed party name do not seem to have the protections of the Constitution. We are currently in a situation where either of the three following could be used.
§842. Proscription of Communist Party, its successors, and subsidiary organizations
The Communist Party of the United States, or any successors of such party regardless of the assumed name, whose object or purpose is to overthrow the Government of the United States, or the government of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein by force and violence, are not entitled to any of the rights, privileges, and immunities attendant upon legal bodies created under the jurisdiction of the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof; and whatever rights, privileges, and immunities which have heretofore been granted to said party or any subsidiary organization by reason of the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof, are terminated: Provided, however, That nothing in this section shall be construed as amending the Internal Security Act of 1950, as amended [50 U.S.C. 781 et seq.]
(Aug. 24, 1954, ch. 886, §3, 68 Stat. 776 .) https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section842&num=0&edition=prelim
§1502. Influencing elections; taking part in political campaigns; prohibitions; exceptions
(a) A State or local officer or employee may not—
(1) use his official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an election or a nomination for office;
(2) directly or indirectly coerce, attempt to coerce, command, or advise a State or local officer or employee to pay, lend, or contribute anything of value to a party, committee, organization, agency, or person for political purposes; or
(3) if the salary of the employee is paid completely, directly or indirectly, by loans or grants made by the United States or a Federal agency, be a candidate for elective office.
(b) A State or local officer or employee retains the right to vote as he chooses and to express his opinions on political subjects and candidates.
(c) Subsection (a)(3) of this section does not apply to—
(1) the Governor or Lieutenant Governor of a State or an individual authorized by law to act as Governor;
(2) the mayor of a city;
(3) a duly elected head of an executive department of a State, municipality, or the District of Columbia who is not classified under a State, municipal, or the District of Columbia merit or civil-service system; or
(4) an individual holding elective office.
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/[email protected]/part2/chapter15&edition=prelim
§251. Federal aid for State governments
Whenever there is an insurrection in any State against its government, the President may, upon the request of its legislature or of its governor if the legislature cannot be convened, call into Federal service such of the militia of the other States, in the number requested by that State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to suppress the insurrection.
(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 15, §331; renumbered §251, Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XII, §1241(a)(2), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2497.)
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/[email protected]/subtitleA/part1/chapter13&edition=prelim
There’s free speech for them, not for us. We get fact checked, or banned, or shadow banned.
The problem is that they are brazen enough to mandate unconstitutional “laws” anyway. Then fine and/or arrest you. And basically bully you in general. What is your recourse? To sue the state months or years later? They don’t care.
I’ll probably get voted down, but this is the one reason why I kinda agree with the rioting going on now.
Why? They are rioting because they want to. Not because any injustice has been done to them.
I think most of them are rioting because they’re idiots who just want to cause mayhem and get free stuff, but there’s probably also a small minority who are doing it because of unjust laws.
Which unjust laws?
I don’t know. You’ll have to ask the rioters.
They've been asked. The answer was Rolex bread.
Yeah I won’t downvote you. I want to hear this perspective.
I'm fine with the rioting as it brings us closer to the collapse. They're just idiots though.
I only like the rioting because they're destroying already shit cities
State emergency powers, all gun control legislation — REPUGNANT TO THE CONSTITUTION!!!! ILLEGAL!!
I’m pretty sure diversity quotas run contrary to “freedom of association” as well.
Should be allowed to hire whoever you want
It really irks me how many infringements we have on our 2a rights.
...🤔main reason Trump told the governors they could handle their own state decisions on the Covid 19 was to expose which governors were not Constitution based I believe.
I don't think it was 4D chess to expose them; I think he really expected the states and cities to handle their own issues as he offered his help to remove barriers. It's not for the president to micromanage all fifty states; that's an impossible task. I don't understand how people can think a president, even GEOTUS, can do that.
I think it was simply just to expose how shit our political system is. Why the fuck does the POTUS need to step in when something is happening in a random city in this country? Where is the mayor? The governor? State senators and house reps?
The fact that Trump is being blamed for situation on a city scale shows me just how incompetent all those politicians are. I do not think the left realizes that by criticizing Trump for these things, they are saying that every single level of government below Trump has failed spectacularly.
In my opinion the federal government should only manage the military and a couple other national services, there is absolutely zero reason for the POTUS to be as powerful as he is. Why does a guy in DC have influence over what happens thousands of miles away? Why don't we give these powers back to states and counties? If there are people who want UBI and taxpayer funded healthcare and illegal immigrants, let them. Fuck it, this is America, if you want to be retarded and destroy your own community you should learn your lesson the hard way without forcing it onto 330 million other people.
Why can't we have communist, fascist, libertarian, etc states all under America? Let people be governed how they want. Leave it to the states. Federal should be military and few other things, you're correct.
Leftists: muh dictatah propaganda
Patriots: Gawd Emperah hype (I sometimes get caught up in this)
We have to realize that President Trump is still human, even if his opponents are not.
Whether or not it was 4D chess (it was), the situation still revealed the politicians who would happily run counter to the Constitution and those who would uphold it.
The Constitution doesn't exist to the radical left. That's why they are working so hard at unconstitutional actions, if there are no consequences to being unconstitutional, it's unnecessary and easier to throw away, change and start over with a socialist platform.
"I don't need the Constitution. I'm a wise Latina. I'm wiser than all of our founding fathers plus Thomas Sowell put together."
AOC is that you?
Nah, more like a certain fat diabetic that is helping pull a Weekend at Bernies with RBG's corpse.
Sotomayor?
So laughably unqualified. What a joke!
Obama was the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people.
ItS oUtDaTeD
Only the brave can be free. The meekly obedient will ever only be slaves.
I used to think the answer was "Well lets follow the law until the Supreme Court saves the day by formally declaring it unconstitutional."
Not anymore.
I'm in MA. send help. I can't even possess ammunition without a license.
That's insane. I just walked into a store the other day and bought a nice big box of boom boom capsules without even showing ID.
Also, The Constitution was written to be understood in plain English.
If a lawyer or a judge says Shall NOT Be Infringed, means something else, that person is a clown.
Imagine an 18 year old knowing what the word "infringed" means, but after a university education they are no longer sure of the meaning b/c it's "complicated".
The left would argue the definition of "repugnant" to the point where "repugnant" means "agrees with".
it's part of newspeak - redefine words. Have you noticed that anyone who isn't an overt Marxist is "a Nazi"? Not an accident!
I triggered a leftist pretty hard once without even trying in a chat room. They were saying something about Nazis causing some problem somewhere in the city, and I replied that the Nazi party was disbanded after WW2. They responded with "NEO-NAZI!" and posted a Wikipedia link to "neo-nazi" in chat, followed by a rant about how they're everywhere.
I've only lived here a few years but I don't remember seeing any neo-nazi parades, neo-nazi gangs causing havoc downtown, nazi flags on any signs or houses, or anyone giving nazi salutes anywhere.
Trump 2020 will herald the coming of a new wave of constitutionalism, mark my words.
And the constitution and Bill of Rights is there to protect AGAINST the governments infringement on un-alienable, god given rights. It does not grant rights. It protects those rights.
looks like a weiner
Maybe you should go to the doctor...
the weiner doctor?
The entire NFA and GCA are unconstitutional on their face.
You know it, I know it, everyone knows it, yet the ATF still exists, and men are rotting in prison for violating these “laws of the land”.
There’s no way to force the Supreme Court to hear a case they chose not to hear, so the infringement goes on, unchecked.
Violent revolution is made inevitable because they make peaceful revolution impossible. Note here that revolution means simply returning to the legal law of the land and a return to freedom. What a crazy thought.
Too bad SCOTUS refuse to read the constitution
All gun laws are unconstitutional.
I’ve been saying for years there are thousands of laws that are void. Try making that argument in court and see how that holds up.
"The price of Liberty is everlasting vigilance."
Now if we can get some republican lawyers to get off their asses and start suing we will be doing something. The gym owner in New Jersey should be first in line.
I don’t think many legislators have been legislating accordingly. Repugnancy levels: all time high.
Why are the Democrats above the law...just tell me why!
Evil triumphs when good men do nothing.
"Fuck the Constitution." Earl Warren, Warren Berger, John Roberts.
We have us a "SHITLOAD" of repugnant unconstitutional laws and even more repugnant lawmakers.
So all guns laws in America are null and void and never were if they infringe on your right to bear arms.
Thats why bears should not eat Mexican food.
hehe i get it
bear eat taco go pffft
2nd Amendment anyone?
Nowadays we don't even get as far as statutes passed by legislators, instead we are slaves to executive decree or worse, judicial decree.
A lot of our problems are stemming from bad decisions by the supreme court.
It's true, but sadly the only way that the end-runs around the Constitution known as "codes" and "statutes" created by lawyers and politicians will ever be nullified is when police actually know the basis of the laws they are enforcing. They need the knowledge and support to be able to refuse to enforce unlawful policies. I support and respect police, and understand the very real need for them, but it seems that due to corruption and lack of training in actual law they have been rendered almost equivalent to mob enforcers. A lot of sheriffs seem to get it, as many stated they would not enforce mask edicts. It would be nice if LEOs got back to being Peacekeepers, instead of "policy enforcers" for tyrants. A good start would be to make police chiefs elected, like Sheriffs instead of appointed by mayors. That way they would be working for us.
Thanks for posting OP. Can't ever go wrong with the Constitution.
All laws restricting 2a are null and void
all the way up to a rocket launcher?
Yes, tank even.
Michigan failed in its lawsuit. The court decided that the State Constitution beat out any claim of violation of THE Constitution. They also claimed some out of date law from WWII or something somehow grants Whitmer the right to emergency powers to violate the Constitution under the (BS) claim of public necessity. I'm glad two states managed to gain their freedom back. This just highlighted how corrupt Michigan courts are.
The prostate story backs up why I refuse to go to a doctor unless I NEED to. I'm female and the medical profession has been forcing pelvic and pap exams on women for decades. They do virtually nothing, if not nothing, for asymptomatic individuals, yet we're bullied, coerced, and blackmailed into submitting (they won't give us treatment/meds for our REAL problems unless we submit). I'd never heard of a patient (male or female) being physically attacked like that. I hope he sued for more than just machismo violation, include rape in there too because that's what it was. They don't get a different term for it just because it was medical professionals who did it, it wasn't just "forced medical examination" either.
This goes for all gun restrictions too.
There is no logical way to read "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" to mean "Well that's an okay infringement". It simply isn't how logic works.
You can argue it's a bad amendment and try to change it, that's at least an argument. But saying it means infringements are okay isn't.
Seems so simple. Forward this to John Roberts.
This ☝
This is so good. Notice Reagan said the feds should be protecting peoples constitutional rights. It's a shame the feds have never been actually used to come in and enforce constitutional rights like the 2nd.
Great interview! It’s a weird artefact of human society and economics that the answer is almost invariably ‘free markets’, but that notion can always be attacked by asking for specifics about how that might work, for that is unknowable, so the answer must come down to ‘I don’t know, it just works’. Whereas, someone proposing regulatory measures can always claim superior understanding because they only need to explain how their measure works in the limited context of their system of rules.
Delicious. Everyone needs to knows this, because they aren't teaching it in the Indoctrination Centers, er, uh, I mean schools.
somebody tell the mask nazis
I only wish the founding fathers had been a little more specific, like overly redundant with our 2nd Amendment.
Repugnant = Democrat party!
90% of people I explain this too make a sour face and say "But Blah Blah Blah!"
NO! FUCK YOUR "BLAH BLAH BLAH"! US Constitution is the most basic and supreme law of AMERICA! FULL STOP, FUCK COMMIES!
All anti-2a 'laws' BTFO
Shall not be infringed?
Marbury vs. Madison exists: NY: "I'm going to pretend I didn't see that"
Hey this means that my right to bear arms “shall not be infringed”. God I hate the left!
Shall not be infringed!