3013
Comments (55)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
16
peeje172 16 points ago +16 / -0

Great illustration, do you have the link to the article? I'd love to use it to drop some red pills.

10
p8riot 10 points ago +10 / -0

Seconding the request for a source!

9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
11
electricboogaloo 11 points ago +11 / -0

bujGr3kM9g59yZo1BdryhuLSWu5Sd7F9wKloy6YmjkB03Gazdcmxofq2PBOzc76MnIc1ADvyNOj jC

1
DonaldoTrumpeto 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not even that great. It's created with a small dataset.

Look in the top left where the probability of dying with 0 comorbidities is greater than 1 at 90+.

2
Dimocrat_Lies 2 points ago +2 / -0

There’s probably not a lot of 90 year olds that have 0-1 of those issues.

1
DonaldoTrumpeto 1 point ago +1 / -0

CNN achors are so stupid that if you showed this to them, they would be rationalizing why having 0 cormorbidities is worse than 1 at 90+. Democrats can't do math, they think with their emotions and not their brains.

1
peeje172 1 point ago +1 / -0

Although I agree 9,000 isn't a large sample size, I think because it was Denmark (~16,000 "cases") is why the number is low