I don't disagree. It also stifles social relations and communication of emotions. You know how on the interwebs it can be difficult to determine intended tone or hard to gauge if someone is being snarky or joking? Apply that to real life. Subtle facial expressions and tone of voice are both muffled by masks. Not a good thing.
Masks are being used to psychologically break resistance to those who are trying to give orders.
For example, if you're in a room of ten people, and I want to show that I'm in charge, I might give an order like: "Everyone put on sunglasses right now!". About two people were on my side to begin with, so they'll put on the shades. Another three people don't know what's going on, but they assume I know what I'm talking about because I'm barking orders the loudest. Another two people think it's cool to wear sunglasses inside, so they put them on. Now, for some reason, you don't agree that I'm in charge...but in this room of 10 people, 70% just appeared to have followed my orders. Psychologically, you feel you are against me and the 7 people who are wearing shades. You're less likely to feel brave enough to resist, so you'll probably put the shades on...and I have effectively taken control of the room!
Masks don't do anything according to the U. Minnesota center for disease research. Yet they still are pro mask mandate (officially) so as to not get hate mail.
I've had this bookmarked for a while. People got to these guys and basically shut their findings down. They addressed that in the opening edit which is disappointing.
Their second point they addressed against themselves is "(2) wearing a cloth mask or face covering is better than doing nothing" which is utter bullshit and not an argument in favor of doing anything. The burden of proof lies with the person making a claim to the affirmative and "just in case" is not an argument or proof, especially when we're discussing MANDATES and not just personal choice.
While it is normalizing “black blocking” which is what Antifags call their uniform, I think the intentions are more sinister. Dehumanizing us, brain washing our kids, and harming our health.
It doesn’t need to be a legal requirement for everyone to wear a mask in order to provide Antifa a reason to hide their identities behind masks. All they would need for that would be a mere suggestion from the cdc.
Yet, at least 18 states and Washington DC have laws that could be used to penalize those who wear face coverings. Municipalities also often have their own anti-mask laws.
Many of these face-covering laws were enacted to target the Ku Klux Klan’s use of masks and hoods to conceal their identity. More recently, states have proposed, and sometimes enacted, restrictions on face coverings after protesters wore masks either during pipeline, Black Lives Matter, or anti-fascist protests.
That’s immaterial. The op was to prove wrong the idea that the mask mandated were specifically to provide cover so Antifa has a reason to conceal their identity.
I maintain that it does not require any mandate. Nothing more than a health guideline is necessary and they still have the benefit of the doubt in the eyes of the public. “The cdc recommends a face covering so that’s why Antifa is wearing masks.” That’s all it takes.
Same. Add to it the releasing of convicts from jail + making everybody unemployed.
I don't disagree. It also stifles social relations and communication of emotions. You know how on the interwebs it can be difficult to determine intended tone or hard to gauge if someone is being snarky or joking? Apply that to real life. Subtle facial expressions and tone of voice are both muffled by masks. Not a good thing.
90% of what you say isn't what you say, it's how you say it.
https://youtu.be/Jr0CtgYwHIs
The masks were meant to hide law breakers.
The Wuhan shutdowns were meant to destroy small businesses.
The riots and looting are meant to finish off the small businesses.
Destroyed small businesses help mega corporations.
Mega corporations support Joe Biden, Democrats, and globalist Rino's.
It’s so creepy!
I wondered this myself. It is too perfect
After the election I'd love to see some type of mandates against NOT covering your face in public as a way to fight the rioting.
Most if not all municipalities and or states have "no facial coverings while protesting" ordinances (anti - kkk laws), hence the mask mandate.
always has been
No it's not to hide antifa.
Masks are being used to psychologically break resistance to those who are trying to give orders.
For example, if you're in a room of ten people, and I want to show that I'm in charge, I might give an order like: "Everyone put on sunglasses right now!". About two people were on my side to begin with, so they'll put on the shades. Another three people don't know what's going on, but they assume I know what I'm talking about because I'm barking orders the loudest. Another two people think it's cool to wear sunglasses inside, so they put them on. Now, for some reason, you don't agree that I'm in charge...but in this room of 10 people, 70% just appeared to have followed my orders. Psychologically, you feel you are against me and the 7 people who are wearing shades. You're less likely to feel brave enough to resist, so you'll probably put the shades on...and I have effectively taken control of the room!
Why not both?
antifa always wears masks. this is cover for blm and biden voters
thought we knew that
Masks don't do anything according to the U. Minnesota center for disease research. Yet they still are pro mask mandate (officially) so as to not get hate mail.
This link should be pasted everywhere.
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data
I've had this bookmarked for a while. People got to these guys and basically shut their findings down. They addressed that in the opening edit which is disappointing.
Their second point they addressed against themselves is "(2) wearing a cloth mask or face covering is better than doing nothing" which is utter bullshit and not an argument in favor of doing anything. The burden of proof lies with the person making a claim to the affirmative and "just in case" is not an argument or proof, especially when we're discussing MANDATES and not just personal choice.
While it is normalizing “black blocking” which is what Antifags call their uniform, I think the intentions are more sinister. Dehumanizing us, brain washing our kids, and harming our health.
I have said the same thing.
Funny. It’s almost like 2020 has all been scripted.
I too have been saying this for months. Too obvious.
No, all they would have to do is suggest it.
It doesn’t need to be a legal requirement for everyone to wear a mask in order to provide Antifa a reason to hide their identities behind masks. All they would need for that would be a mere suggestion from the cdc.
Yet, at least 18 states and Washington DC have laws that could be used to penalize those who wear face coverings. Municipalities also often have their own anti-mask laws.
Many of these face-covering laws were enacted to target the Ku Klux Klan’s use of masks and hoods to conceal their identity. More recently, states have proposed, and sometimes enacted, restrictions on face coverings after protesters wore masks either during pipeline, Black Lives Matter, or anti-fascist protests.
re: https://www.icnl.org/post/analysis/anti-mask-laws-covid-19-and-the-first-amendment
That’s immaterial. The op was to prove wrong the idea that the mask mandated were specifically to provide cover so Antifa has a reason to conceal their identity.
I maintain that it does not require any mandate. Nothing more than a health guideline is necessary and they still have the benefit of the doubt in the eyes of the public. “The cdc recommends a face covering so that’s why Antifa is wearing masks.” That’s all it takes.
Usually they hid their faces with masks anyway…
And keeping the bars/music venues closed is making sure there will be many young bodies to help them with their cover.