Not firing Fauci. Almost all of his appointees, particularly Ivanka and Jared. The re-redaction of the JFK files, for starters....Keep in mind though, it’s not necessarily limited to things that look corrupt. I’m actually more interested in things that look stupid but ended up actually objectively being a good decision when everyone else thought it was dumb
We’ll hiring Ivanka and Jared is obvious nepotism, let’s be honest. Both are highly unqualified for anything within a Presidential advisory position. Redacting the JFK papers when they were literally set to be released completely unredacted within a week before he inserted himself into the situation and redacted them? How does that not look incredibly corrupt? Fauci could be corruption, or stupidity, or him playing 4D chess. That’s the whole point of this conversation
Oh there’s absolutely a difference between bad decisions and corrupt decisions, and I’m not asserting any distinction to any specific instance, or either for that matter. That’s the whole point. In my eyes, he’s definitely done some things that were pretty foolish, on the surface anyway. He’s also done some things that I can definitely see would look corrupt, at least on the surface. Those things could all possibly be carefully calculated moves designed to win the long game that we just aren’t tactically minded or in-the-know enough to see for sure. What I’m asking is if anyone has any specific instances of things he did where the general consensus among the MSM or normies, or really anyone that wouldn’t vote for him even if he went full dictator (there’s more than you think), was that it was foolish or corrupt, to where we now know, with 100% certainty because the endgame has already come to pass, was actually an objectively good decision that achieved a net positive that nobody predicted, and that the Trust the Plan’ers were vindicated in?
Not firing Fauci. Almost all of his appointees, particularly Ivanka and Jared. The re-redaction of the JFK files, for starters....Keep in mind though, it’s not necessarily limited to things that look corrupt. I’m actually more interested in things that look stupid but ended up actually objectively being a good decision when everyone else thought it was dumb
I’m sorry, but I’m still not seeing why you see corruption. There is a difference between what may be considered bad decisions and corrupt decisions.
We’ll hiring Ivanka and Jared is obvious nepotism, let’s be honest. Both are highly unqualified for anything within a Presidential advisory position. Redacting the JFK papers when they were literally set to be released completely unredacted within a week before he inserted himself into the situation and redacted them? How does that not look incredibly corrupt? Fauci could be corruption, or stupidity, or him playing 4D chess. That’s the whole point of this conversation
Oh there’s absolutely a difference between bad decisions and corrupt decisions, and I’m not asserting any distinction to any specific instance, or either for that matter. That’s the whole point. In my eyes, he’s definitely done some things that were pretty foolish, on the surface anyway. He’s also done some things that I can definitely see would look corrupt, at least on the surface. Those things could all possibly be carefully calculated moves designed to win the long game that we just aren’t tactically minded or in-the-know enough to see for sure. What I’m asking is if anyone has any specific instances of things he did where the general consensus among the MSM or normies, or really anyone that wouldn’t vote for him even if he went full dictator (there’s more than you think), was that it was foolish or corrupt, to where we now know, with 100% certainty because the endgame has already come to pass, was actually an objectively good decision that achieved a net positive that nobody predicted, and that the Trust the Plan’ers were vindicated in?