4829
Comments (294)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
6
dahdahdah_dahditdah 6 points ago +8 / -2

A short video out of context doesn't prove anything. If Kyle was acting in defense of someone else and shutting down a violent bully, then hitting a girl could make sense.

And even if Kyle was in the wrong on another occasion, that means precisely zilch for this well documented self defense situation.

2
Trump2024 2 points ago +3 / -1

I didn't mention it to detract from his being 100% correct for using his 2nd ammendment rights for his self defense. I'm surprised you can't see how it can be used against him. Were you being serious about that part?

1
dahdahdah_dahditdah 1 point ago +1 / -0

I could be wrong, however it seems like if his defense does their job, the well documented circumstances of his self defense incident in Kenosha should not be affected by the other video. If he acted correctly and appropriately under the well documented threatening circumstances, then the general presumption of innocence must stand.

What do you think, pede? How do you see them spinning it?

2
Trump2024 2 points ago +3 / -1

I see them spinning it just like every single politically charged event. That being they will dig into his past to extract the flimsiest negative points they can find. "Oh my God! The pediatrician said that the second he was out of the womb he was punching, kicking and biting, as if it were the devil himself!"