No 16-17 year olds need to be "in compliance with" 29.593 to gain the section 3 long gun exemption. Kyle needs to have met the requirements (basically some sort of training) to obtain WI hunting approval(license), if not the license itself to get out of 948.60. No compliance with 3c, no exemption.
948.60(2)(a) sets the general rule disallowing the possession by a minor of a deadly weapon.
948.60(3)(c) grants an exception which applies to all under (2)(a) since 3(c) finds 2(a) to apply only if..... in violation of 29.304 and 29.593, and 29.304 only applies to those under 16 thus is silent on those between 16-18 yoa thus if 16-18 the 948.60(2)(a) penalty does not apply to them.
29.593 is a definition of hunting licenses. One cannot be in violation of a definition.
Put your phone down, open the WI statutes. You're being lazy in reading them.
3C doesn't say anything about "violation" of 29.304 and 29.593, it says they need to be in "compliance" with them. That means exemption for under 16 hunters compliant with 29.304, irrelevant here what it's silent on. Or an exemption for those who "comply" with 29.593 "definition" of hunting approval eligibility which is the only way for anyone else under 18 (16-17) to get exemption from section 2a. Under 18 doesn't need to violate anything or their specific age be referenced, they need to meet one of those burdens to gain an exemption.
Not saying I agree with it, but that's how it's intended. The lawmakers didn't want non-hunters under 18 carrying anything.
Go to 3c. The firearms thing under 3a won't need to apply because merely hitting 16 gets Kyle out of 948.60
No 16-17 year olds need to be "in compliance with" 29.593 to gain the section 3 long gun exemption. Kyle needs to have met the requirements (basically some sort of training) to obtain WI hunting approval(license), if not the license itself to get out of 948.60. No compliance with 3c, no exemption.
No.
948.60(2)(a) sets the general rule disallowing the possession by a minor of a deadly weapon.
948.60(3)(c) grants an exception which applies to all under (2)(a) since 3(c) finds 2(a) to apply only if..... in violation of 29.304 and 29.593, and 29.304 only applies to those under 16 thus is silent on those between 16-18 yoa thus if 16-18 the 948.60(2)(a) penalty does not apply to them.
29.593 is a definition of hunting licenses. One cannot be in violation of a definition.
Put your phone down, open the WI statutes. You're being lazy in reading them.
3C doesn't say anything about "violation" of 29.304 and 29.593, it says they need to be in "compliance" with them. That means exemption for under 16 hunters compliant with 29.304, irrelevant here what it's silent on. Or an exemption for those who "comply" with 29.593 "definition" of hunting approval eligibility which is the only way for anyone else under 18 (16-17) to get exemption from section 2a. Under 18 doesn't need to violate anything or their specific age be referenced, they need to meet one of those burdens to gain an exemption.
Not saying I agree with it, but that's how it's intended. The lawmakers didn't want non-hunters under 18 carrying anything.
Yes it does.
You need to violate both 304 and 593.
Read 304(5). This gets you out of 948.60
You just invented what you are claiming as under 593. Stop LARPing
love watching commies come to our boards and get PwNt!!