??? 3c is specifically about compliance with the hunting regulations in order to gain exception for long barreled rifles and shotguns. No compliance with the hunting regs cited in 3c, no section 3 long gun exemption. Basically Kyle lawyer has to argue he could have met the requirements (29.593) cited in 3c to obtain WI hunting approval(license).
948.60 section 3c "This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if.. (it is short barreled) ..or not in compliance with ss. 29.304(under 16 supervised hunting/practice) and 29.593 (meets requirement to obtain hunters license)."
So anyone 16-17 has to meet 29.593 requirement (compliance) to gain section 3c exemption of long barreled rifles and shotguns from the 948.60 under 18 firearm prohibition.
Read 3c. You're being lazy in reading the statute
??? 3c is specifically about compliance with the hunting regulations in order to gain exception for long barreled rifles and shotguns. No compliance with the hunting regs cited in 3c, no section 3 long gun exemption. Basically Kyle lawyer has to argue he could have met the requirements (29.593) cited in 3c to obtain WI hunting approval(license).
Bottom of 3c.
Get off your phone, open the statutes and start again from 948.60(2)(a)
948.60 section 3c "This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if.. (it is short barreled) ..or not in compliance with ss. 29.304(under 16 supervised hunting/practice) and 29.593 (meets requirement to obtain hunters license)."
So anyone 16-17 has to meet 29.593 requirement (compliance) to gain section 3c exemption of long barreled rifles and shotguns from the 948.60 under 18 firearm prohibition.
NO
You are in violation if you are not in compliance of both.
593 is a definition.
304 is the rule. You follow the rule.
Open 593 and point to where it places penalty or shut up. Stop inventing things in your head and claiming them as law.