Now, this is funny. You call this guy out for asking for self-defense laws after giving your wish list? How do you think any part of your revoke and deport ideas are even possible?
I am not at all against self-defense laws, nor did I argue against them. And I didn't focus on or address his first point, 1 (which I am not necessarily against). I directly and specifically referred to his second point, 2.
Your bullet list [...] not anything resembling reality.
I raised that concern as well. And my argument was that the proposal I give seem much, much, much more realistic (and would help enable his second point, 2) than his second point, 2, as I argued for.
And notice this part from my first comment:
So I have no idea whether even this is possible.
EDIT: I apologize if I was unclear in my comment that I focused on the second point, 2. I notice now that for the first sentence, I put in a dot instead of a comma or similar before making it clear what I referred to.
I am not at all against self-defense laws, nor did I argue against them. And I didn't focus on or address his first point, 1 (which I am not necessarily against). I directly and specifically referred to his second point, 2.
I raised that concern as well. And my argument was that the proposal I give seem much, much, much more realistic (and would help enable his second point, 2) than his second point, 2, as I argued for.
And notice this part from my first comment:
EDIT: I apologize if I was unclear in my comment that I focused on the second point, 2. I notice now that for the first sentence, I put in a dot instead of a comma or similar before making it clear what I referred to.