This is the same shit you see leftist scum pull on social media. In their echo chambers they will make wild claims and get upvoted or liked. But if you say something contrary to what they want to hear, they will demand six sources, three peer reviewed scientific journals, and all your sources must be from a far left source.
And then they'll just angrily ban you and ignore what you wrote.
And the worst thing about their demand for sources is that they typically demand links, as in online, which means things curated by the Internet-era gatekeepers. They'll dismiss you if you say you read something in a book published in 1950 or 1880.
"Trump says, without evidence, that..." is another of their "go-to"s.
This is the same shit you see leftist scum pull on social media. In their echo chambers they will make wild claims and get upvoted or liked. But if you say something contrary to what they want to hear, they will demand six sources, three peer reviewed scientific journals, and all your sources must be from a far left source.
And then they'll just angrily ban you and ignore what you wrote.
Ah. You too have been to r/politics.
This is so fucking true it hurts
And the worst thing about their demand for sources is that they typically demand links, as in online, which means things curated by the Internet-era gatekeepers. They'll dismiss you if you say you read something in a book published in 1950 or 1880.
Think about all the times anything is said, "without evidence".
The phrase is literally meaningless.
What they mean is he didn't cite a Wikipedia-approved source.
Funny when their evidence is always wikipedia articles that reference back to the same news site.
"Trump repeats debunked conspiracy theory promoted by the alt right that says..."