First off I came here only to post this, believe me or not.
We were told not to even worry about the second or third shooting, only the first shooting. We are instructed to mainly interview witnesses from the first case. If the D.A can prove that’s murder, the second and third become almost automatic.
Here’s the concept for a layman, say someone robs a bank, kills a teller and is fleeing the scene. A random citizen tries to stop the fleeing suspect with a skateboard or any weapon and he kills him. When fleeing a crime, you aren’t protected under self defense.
I’m not saying I agree nor disagree, just this is what we were instructed. To focus on making shooting 1 unjustified
Hello guys, new account as I only meant to drop the information and never return, I made the password and forgot it. I felt I needed to post because I see a lot of misinformation.
Believe it or not, there was at least two snipers, yes snipers on scene. We interviewed two business owners that let men with rifles on their roof. We also believe there is a good chance of multiple shooters but not from the muzzle flash person. We are thinking the fifth and final shot that punctured the lung was from a roof from behind. There’s also two videos that haven’t been released and we have recovered the projectile thrown at Kyle. When you guys hear the official story it’s looks like it’s from a movie. Radios, two “snipers” firing from opposite directions, a fire cracker, even what was thrown by Rosenbaum is “peculiar”.
SPILL MOTHERFUCKER. I need to know. Risk your job for my entertainment!
There isn’t much to spill. What do you want to know? There really isn’t much information I could “leak”. I’m almost certain all our evidence will be given to the press by Friday. I know the “sniper” story for sure
There are lots of things people are curious about - what was in the bag that was thrown, what is new from the two unreleased videos you mentioned, etc.
I'm curious about your personal opinion - do you think they were justified in charging Kyle based on what they know? Or is it what it looks like from the outside - a Democrat DA charging the political opposition?
I don’t think I can tell.
Nothing at all, really
Definitely not from what they know. They get the information from us and I couldn’t call it either way. I’m not just saying this to appear neutral, I would tell you, I’m honestly 50/50.
Edit: I’m not trying to withhold in formation, everything I told you, about 200 people already know. Telling what’s was in the bag, limits me to maybe 15 people. Every one in this building knows about the snipers. We actually walked around to ransoms (in the department) “where do those pops sound like they came from”.
Friday press releases are typically ones containing bad news for the powers that be. Is that the way things are leaning right now? Is there political pressure to minimize the additional details for partisan reasons?
I don’t know what that means, sorry
I misspoke. The instructions were more like “ the second shooting isn’t a priority, mainly focus on the first shooting”
Magyars are what’s up.
"There’s also two videos that haven’t been released"
Can you please explain what the videos are? Or at least offer insight if they help or hurt Kyle's case?
Hello, I barely understand the other questions, I’m not ignoring them I just don’t know the answers. The answer to this question is “I don’t know.”, yet. There’s a lot of evidence people aren’t privy to yet (the sniper story will be out by Friday). Someone involved had a traffic stop. There was something, not a firearm, that a officer saw. There was also a level of coordination through Wilkie-talkies. I can tell you we don’t have any evidence of Kyle having one. There isn’t much more to say, every video is grainy, and ballistics haven’t been done and almost every eyewitness has lied. The last thing I can tell you is the round to the back has been recovered as well as three, yes three ar-15s and ballistics are in progress
Thanks for responding. Stay safe and keep us updated!
Does that specify that Kyle shot Rosenbaum 3x? Or could that be that Kyle shot a total of 3x like we've all thought?
Man, I forgot all about that!
Someone go back and check the old videos. It might even have been a video from a previous night. There's definitely a video that I remember seeing of that same boarded-up mechanic's shop with 2 guys standing on the edge of the roof talking to either the cameraman or to someone else at ground level.
I remember seeing that and thinking "ha, white rooftop Koreans" because it looked like the safest place to be to guard something.
I can't believe that nobody has considered this as the source of the "mystery shots" that are clearly heard on the video when Kyle turns to confront Red-shirt Pedo guy.
I'd always thought it was someone with a handgun taking shots at Kyle after he shoots because the difference in the volume of the shots makes it seem smaller. But now I realize it could just be farther away or up high off camera instead, like from a rooftop.
I feel like this has to be overall good news for Kyle. If more than one person shot Red-shirt Pedo guy, then CLEARLY his actions were seen as threatening not just by Kyle in that split-second decision but also to a remote observer who was likely watching the incident unfold and decided to intervene as well.
Exactly.
Surely all that csi type stuff will show angle of entry wound. That would prove he wasn’t able to have made that/those shots. As well as ballistics.
Absolutely. The back bullet and three rifles are being tested
Well it was certainly complicated by them moving the body from the scene of crime trying to rescue the dead man.
Yes. Complicated. But video shows he fell face forward and The McGinnis Guy turned him over. So not impossible.