First off I came here only to post this, believe me or not.
We were told not to even worry about the second or third shooting, only the first shooting. We are instructed to mainly interview witnesses from the first case. If the D.A can prove that’s murder, the second and third become almost automatic.
Here’s the concept for a layman, say someone robs a bank, kills a teller and is fleeing the scene. A random citizen tries to stop the fleeing suspect with a skateboard or any weapon and he kills him. When fleeing a crime, you aren’t protected under self defense.
I’m not saying I agree nor disagree, just this is what we were instructed. To focus on making shooting 1 unjustified
It wasnt a flaming object, it was a plastic bag with something inside it, which couldve been a brick. There are other videos where you can see it laying on the ground after being thrown. It doesnt even matter though because he was still being chased and the guy that threw it tried to grab his gun from him.
and there was a shot fired behind him... anyone being chased hearing a gunshot from behind them DEFINITELY is in fear of their life... the fact the guy appears to shoot into the air is irrelevant... as kyle wouldnt know that
You know.. this guys comments about people on the roof, makes me wonder if that wasnt a shot into the air but at someone on the roof.
I know, Im saying that dude mightve been shooting at someone on the roof, not just a random shot in the air to scare kyle.
This is correct but it wasn’t a brick.
So what was it?
You should know by Friday. Who’s was it would be the correct question to ask.