First off I came here only to post this, believe me or not.
We were told not to even worry about the second or third shooting, only the first shooting. We are instructed to mainly interview witnesses from the first case. If the D.A can prove that’s murder, the second and third become almost automatic.
Here’s the concept for a layman, say someone robs a bank, kills a teller and is fleeing the scene. A random citizen tries to stop the fleeing suspect with a skateboard or any weapon and he kills him. When fleeing a crime, you aren’t protected under self defense.
I’m not saying I agree nor disagree, just this is what we were instructed. To focus on making shooting 1 unjustified
So what was it?
You should know by Friday. Who’s was it would be the correct question to ask.
That “he” killed? Not sure. Rosenbaum was the first “shooting” victim (with the red shirt) the shot that killed him was the one the back and despite what you may hear, we don’t know who fired that shot, yet. Or if we’ll ever be certain frankly
The non-brick item(s) in the non flaming bag was carried by Rosenbaum, given to him by a female, and thrown by Rosenbaum at Kyle. Rosenbaum was clearly aggressive throughout all the video, until he breathes his last. He was by far the most aggressive person in any of the videos IMHO, until the team of 3 that has clearly practiced that attack all attacked Kyle, in their rehearsed fashion.
I haven't seen how many times Rosenbaum was shot, or how many times Kyle fired at him. Thanks for your info here
So if DA can’t prove Kyle killed the red shirt guy, then he’ll walk because the other 2 are total self defence. And you’re implying that the first victim was killed by someone else. The shot to the back was the kill shot and there’s no way Kyle made that shot.
Sounds like head graze could have been one of the snipers you allude to. Could be the shot that McGinnis said hit the ground. The one that made him check his leg to see if he was hit. It was on Rosenbaums rt side and McGinnis was behind Rosenbaum to the right.