1514
Comments (39)
sorted by:
34
Zordly 34 points ago +34 / -0

Those 6000 are probably an unknown comorbidity.

16
daty_dato 16 points ago +16 / -0

That's right. At least 20% probably have unknown disease or a genetic makeup that made them particularly susceptible to this virus. What % died from the treatment as well. It'll come out eventually that ventilators killed a bunch of people.

7
PinochetIsMyHero 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's true of damn near every disease, though. Smallpox, pneumonic plague, ebola. All have some people who survive them.

The only disease with 100% mortality (untreated) is rabies -- and even the treatment for rabies has only worked around three times.

2
powershellder 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is possible that some people have gotten rabies and remained asymptomatic.

3
kag-2020- 3 points ago +4 / -1

And they paid doctors $39,000 to murder people with them.

2
Bidenisapedonehundo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Isnt that statistic allready out somewhere? like 90% of people with ventilators died?

3
Brainz 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hello, Pat? Are you there you slimy weasel?

2
RedReddit 2 points ago +2 / -0

This has been my thought process too.

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
9
leg_hairs 9 points ago +9 / -0

Are they real people lol because I always troll the shit out of them

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
kag-2020- 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're probably spammed out and have some admin tool to sift through the responses. It'd probably work best to bait them into a legit discussion.

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
4
leg_hairs 4 points ago +4 / -0

F

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
11
RIPIsaacKappy 11 points ago +11 / -0

It was actually about 9200 deaths due to Chinavirus alone, which was 6% of the Chinavirus death total. Number is now higher, though not by much, and not nearly as high as they're claiming.

Seen people mixing up and writing 6000, which isn't accurate and makes us look like we don't know what we're talking about.

5
RedReddit 5 points ago +5 / -0

6% of 168k is about 10k

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 6 points ago +6 / -0

Jess from Working America asked me this exact question last week, I had the exact same answer as you (minus the CDC stuff)

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
xBigCoffinHunter 4 points ago +4 / -0

6%, close to 10,000 but I got what you were going for there

3
superalienhyphy 3 points ago +3 / -0

ALLOW PEOPLE TO COMPETE WITH THEM YOU FUCKING RETARD

3
RedReddit 3 points ago +3 / -0

6%, aka just over 10k

Spez: changed under to over after actually doing the math

3
Get_me_out_of_IL 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm sorry for your loss

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
MSTRCHF117 2 points ago +2 / -0

SPEAK TO ME PAT

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
HillarysFatAss 2 points ago +2 / -0

I received that same text yesterday. First one ever for me. Pat sure is busy.

2
Dialectic 2 points ago +2 / -0

F

2
Maaglin 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm worried for Pat. Hope he got back to you!

2
shitposter1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

I got one of these messages today too. Verbatim except for their name.

2
TonyGucciano 2 points ago +2 / -0

He didn't want your opinion. He wanted to verify you were low engagement and then brainwash you.

2
WhatUCan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pat didn't talke to me either 😕

2
xopi 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would respond with "become a CEO. Problem solved"

2
sixfingerdildo 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Pat" from India call center contracting, inc. doesn't give a shit either way.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
MagnanimousDonkey 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pat?! Paaaaaaaaat!

2
Adhal 2 points ago +2 / -0

hah i got the same message from him a few days ago, i responded with "vote every democrat out of office", no response back.

was gonna SS it but didnt realize when i listed number as scam caller it would delete it... oh well