2027
Comments (116)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
8
macfoo 8 points ago +10 / -2

sorry but mikhaila is a creepy grifter who nearly killed her father and collapsed her marriage /family as she became addicted to social media attention. she secretly hangs around with Tate, and has already started and stopped so many kooky online money-making schemes... JBP has been an important if imperfect figure for us, but there is no disinfo against mikhaila. she brings it on herself and really should be ashamed and bow out and take care of her family.

5
NWOSTING 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes.

Mikhaila is a talentless potato using her father's position and intelligence to further her own political ambitions.

3
IntrepidBurger 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, that's the exact disinfo that I'm talking about. Watch her 1 hour podcast with her father where they both go into detail about what they went through. She saved his life.

0
macfoo 0 points ago +1 / -1

ok. i retract "nearly killed her father" (though I thought it obvious that bit was hyperbolic). but i stand by the rest. mikhaila is gross and undermines her father's credibility.

3
thenameisdonald 3 points ago +3 / -0

Jordan Peterson’s time in the sun is over. He was an important lightning rod at the time, but he needs to just stay out of this game and get his much needed rest. He’s fairly neurotic I honestly just think the fame made him go crazy.

6
Magatronic 6 points ago +6 / -0

Might have been the fame, attacks and his wife’s advanced cancer.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Generic 1 point ago +1 / -0

so, are you against censorship or for it?

0
macfoo 0 points ago +1 / -1

i'm for platforms being treated legally as platforms, publishers being treated legally as publishers.

rogan sold out, which is his prerogative. he chose to make the deal. i do not consider spotify's actions to be censorship, as spotify is a publisher.

edit, to clarify: i consider facebook and twitter to be censorship, because they purport to be publishers, and enjoy legal treatment as such, when in fact they very clearly operate as publishers.