I'm 100% convinced that Peterson is controlled opposition simply because he constantly preaches about the importance of individualism to his audience of mostly young, white men. In a world where every other group is being taught to be tribal and to blame white people for all their problems, anyone telling whites to stay atomized and to reject group identity is advocating for our dispossession and probably eventual genocide.
I'm 100% convinced that Peterson is controlled opposition simply because he constantly preaches about the importance of individualism to his audience of mostly young, white men.
Can you share us a picture of your bedroom? I get the feeling it's pretty dirty for some reason.
It was enlightening when it was pointed out that Peterson will do a three hour lecture on, say, Genesis, then proceed to never talk about Genesis or The Bible. He immediately springboards into Jung and pop science anecdotes and it’s all very interesting, but it’s not Biblical, and on some level, could certainly be considered an act of subversion. Peterson also gets squirrelly when asked direct simple questions like, “Do you believe in God?” He immediately falls into obfuscation mode where he dances around the question and provides the illusion of answering the question while more or less totally ignoring it. Once you catch on to his evasiveness, it starts to become more and more noticeable, although weirdly I do still like him as a voice against the mob. What I no longer consider him is a leader of men.
I'm 100% convinced that Peterson is controlled opposition simply because he constantly preaches about the importance of individualism to his audience of mostly young, white men. In a world where every other group is being taught to be tribal and to blame white people for all their problems, anyone telling whites to stay atomized and to reject group identity is advocating for our dispossession and probably eventual genocide.
Oh look. Astro turfers trying to make jordan peterson look bad by saying that talking to young white men is bad.
Get the fuck out of here you shills.
Can you share us a picture of your bedroom? I get the feeling it's pretty dirty for some reason.
It was enlightening when it was pointed out that Peterson will do a three hour lecture on, say, Genesis, then proceed to never talk about Genesis or The Bible. He immediately springboards into Jung and pop science anecdotes and it’s all very interesting, but it’s not Biblical, and on some level, could certainly be considered an act of subversion. Peterson also gets squirrelly when asked direct simple questions like, “Do you believe in God?” He immediately falls into obfuscation mode where he dances around the question and provides the illusion of answering the question while more or less totally ignoring it. Once you catch on to his evasiveness, it starts to become more and more noticeable, although weirdly I do still like him as a voice against the mob. What I no longer consider him is a leader of men.