314
Comments (16)
sorted by:
14
Golden_Eagle1776 14 points ago +14 / -0

I was told it does not apply to children under 14 years of age. Still not good 24/14 or 25/15 etc.

6
Skogin 6 points ago +6 / -0

Some consolation...

1
Golden_Eagle1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Indeed, a small bit.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
3
Wess-mantooth 3 points ago +3 / -0

Look, im not a father, but if i were?

7
CrackaJack 7 points ago +7 / -0

How is this legal?!?! W.T.F.

7
Memebomber 7 points ago +7 / -0

The leaders in San Fran can't wait to start fucking little boys

5
GeorgeFentanylFloyd2 5 points ago +5 / -0

Remember the reporter asking trump if he was fighting the pedophile devil worshiping cult as if it was some sort of conspiracy. Yea bitch he is and he better do something about this law.

5
MAGA_TrumpTN 5 points ago +5 / -0

Can someone make a “you are here” chart starting from the breaking up the family and LGBT rights?

4
IncredibleMrE1 4 points ago +4 / -0

The minimum age this law would apply to is 14. That is still far too young, but under 14 it would remain a felony.

3
MrSir 3 points ago +3 / -0

This would be one of those opportune times to stipulate federal funding. Like they did for liquor laws in Michigan.

3
HotPinkGlock 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Introduced by Senator Wiener".....hmm...

3
debmaxlola47 3 points ago +3 / -0

Parents get your children, pack up and leave now.

2
Flahusky 2 points ago +2 / -0

If our based pedes could leave, San Andreas would take care of the rest

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
gDq7BG5efU3PvYb -1 points ago +1 / -2

The bill is all about sex offender registry requirements for convicted felons. It's a bad bill but saying or believing that it is "no longer a felony " is illiterate beyond retarded.