Let's not spread fake news. There are plenty of viruses with effective vaccines: HepB, HPV, measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella are some common ones to start
Yes, but those vaccines went through rigorous trials, studies, and testing before they were used on the general population. This vaccine will be rushed, forced, and not proven to be safe.
Edit: ok, I see the comment you were replying to and agree that we have many safe vaccines in place for a myriad of common viruses.
This vaccine will be rushed, forced, and not proven to be safe
That's the only 100% guaranteed outcome of the "vaccines" they will push. They still struggle to produce an effective Flu vaccine each year. Against some strains of influenza, the typical vaccine is only 10%+ effective (egg cell grown - double that to 20%+ for mouse cell grown vaccines such as Flucelvax*
The Chinese Coronavirus has now mutated into many different strains. The medical companies might as well be playing dodge ball with a hornet's nest in trying to prevent infections of Covid.
*No, I don't have any ties or financial interests with this influenza vaccine - but since I am obligated to get one every year, I have done some research on which ones provide better coverage.
OK maybe the vaccines do work for these viruses, but you might want to talk to some of the mothers who have autistic children now or children who have been paralyzed by those vaccines. Just because they were does it mean that they’re healthy for people and they’ve been destroying kids for years.
Besides anecdotal evidence, there have been absolutely 0 studies showing that vaccines cause autism, unless you have some to share? There have been studies however comparing the rate of autism between vaccinated and unvaccinated children, and the rate is the same. Would you not expect the vaccinated to have a higher rate? And how do you explain autism in unvaccinated children?
Everything in medicine is based on a risk:benefit ratio - do the risks of side effects of a certain intervention outweigh the benefits or not? In the case of vaccines, the risks spread across the entire population do not outweigh the benefits, and so vaccines are recommended. I am fully a supporter of personal choice however. Additionally, while some of those viruses aren't significantly lethal, many of them have long term sequelae. Mumps can cause sterility and measles can cause subacute sclerosing panencephalitis - something hardly seen anymore due to children not getting measles. Also, the polio vaccine has been improved so that there isn't the risk of developing paralysis that was present with the original (Salk vs Sabin). Those are just a couple examples.
There is an argument to be made against the untested COVID vaccine and seasonal flu vaccines that don't get properly tested, but there are other vaccines that have been around for decades that do have benefits, and the argument to oppose each and every vaccine is simply faulty. I don't see how many on this site can believe literature proving hydroxychloroquine is safe, but then disregard any literature showing the efficacy of vaccines.
Let's not spread fake news. There are plenty of viruses with effective vaccines: HepB, HPV, measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella are some common ones to start
Yes, but those vaccines went through rigorous trials, studies, and testing before they were used on the general population. This vaccine will be rushed, forced, and not proven to be safe.
Edit: ok, I see the comment you were replying to and agree that we have many safe vaccines in place for a myriad of common viruses.
That's the only 100% guaranteed outcome of the "vaccines" they will push. They still struggle to produce an effective Flu vaccine each year. Against some strains of influenza, the typical vaccine is only 10%+ effective (egg cell grown - double that to 20%+ for mouse cell grown vaccines such as Flucelvax*
The Chinese Coronavirus has now mutated into many different strains. The medical companies might as well be playing dodge ball with a hornet's nest in trying to prevent infections of Covid.
*No, I don't have any ties or financial interests with this influenza vaccine - but since I am obligated to get one every year, I have done some research on which ones provide better coverage.
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/vaccines-work/effectiveness-studies.htm
https://archive.is/S9t1I
Check out the recombinant flu vaccine FluBlok which doctors seem to want to do anything but prescribe.
I will, thanks for the heads up!
CDC?!? But we have to ignore that!!!!
Or the vets who were tested with ‘live virus’ polio vaccine and later died from ‘ALS’
OK maybe the vaccines do work for these viruses, but you might want to talk to some of the mothers who have autistic children now or children who have been paralyzed by those vaccines. Just because they were does it mean that they’re healthy for people and they’ve been destroying kids for years.
Besides anecdotal evidence, there have been absolutely 0 studies showing that vaccines cause autism, unless you have some to share? There have been studies however comparing the rate of autism between vaccinated and unvaccinated children, and the rate is the same. Would you not expect the vaccinated to have a higher rate? And how do you explain autism in unvaccinated children?
Everything in medicine is based on a risk:benefit ratio - do the risks of side effects of a certain intervention outweigh the benefits or not? In the case of vaccines, the risks spread across the entire population do not outweigh the benefits, and so vaccines are recommended. I am fully a supporter of personal choice however. Additionally, while some of those viruses aren't significantly lethal, many of them have long term sequelae. Mumps can cause sterility and measles can cause subacute sclerosing panencephalitis - something hardly seen anymore due to children not getting measles. Also, the polio vaccine has been improved so that there isn't the risk of developing paralysis that was present with the original (Salk vs Sabin). Those are just a couple examples.
There is an argument to be made against the untested COVID vaccine and seasonal flu vaccines that don't get properly tested, but there are other vaccines that have been around for decades that do have benefits, and the argument to oppose each and every vaccine is simply faulty. I don't see how many on this site can believe literature proving hydroxychloroquine is safe, but then disregard any literature showing the efficacy of vaccines.
Seriously?
Do you have an actual rebuttal? Or can you not type a true response with your hands clutching your pearls?
Thanks Pede