And yet, it is commonly accepted as fact by the layman. Same with the big bang theory. These theories can become gospel according to the church of science. Until it is proven and measurably detected, fantasy is synonymous with hypothesis. Methodological doubt is the basis of the scientific method. Without it, well, have you paid your carbon taxes today?
The big bang theory is in fact a theory hence the word theory. When your opening line is verifiably false (in that it is a theory and not a fact) i dont need to refute anything else youve said. It may indeed be true that our observations seem to line up with the theory, but it is fallible from the onset as we are incapable of observing the entire universe. Its also a bit funny that you say i am zealous in my pursuit of truth, yet all i have stated is that theory is not fact. You are the one conflating the two to make your point, which to me seems to me like the behaviour if a "feelings over facts" leftist. Perhaps we can agree to disagree.
I am familiar hence my skepticism. The math tends further and further into exotic complexity in order to explain all the inconsistancies. I have a hard time trusting a theory which concludes most matter is invisible, unobservable and impossible to quantify. For the record i do not believe in the biblical origin story, unless perhaps it is interpreted allegorically.
Thanks. I needed a chuckle.
Glad someone is laughing. :-D
KEK
I can only take so much fake science haha
Dark matter is simply that which does not allow light
Yeah, it's real
Dark matter/energy was invented in order to make the math work out on other flawed theoretical models. It is fantasy.
And yet, it is commonly accepted as fact by the layman. Same with the big bang theory. These theories can become gospel according to the church of science. Until it is proven and measurably detected, fantasy is synonymous with hypothesis. Methodological doubt is the basis of the scientific method. Without it, well, have you paid your carbon taxes today?
The big bang theory is in fact a theory hence the word theory. When your opening line is verifiably false (in that it is a theory and not a fact) i dont need to refute anything else youve said. It may indeed be true that our observations seem to line up with the theory, but it is fallible from the onset as we are incapable of observing the entire universe. Its also a bit funny that you say i am zealous in my pursuit of truth, yet all i have stated is that theory is not fact. You are the one conflating the two to make your point, which to me seems to me like the behaviour if a "feelings over facts" leftist. Perhaps we can agree to disagree.
I am familiar hence my skepticism. The math tends further and further into exotic complexity in order to explain all the inconsistancies. I have a hard time trusting a theory which concludes most matter is invisible, unobservable and impossible to quantify. For the record i do not believe in the biblical origin story, unless perhaps it is interpreted allegorically.
Did CERN try to create dark matter?
Thank you. They have to blame something I guess. Systematic Racism, Racism, Climate Change, Covid and Dark Matter.
What you're saying is...
"Dark matter is a social construct."