Lin Wood, attorney for Kyle Rittenhouse, says he was locked out of Twitter after posting about raising money for Rittenhouse's legal defense because it is "glorifying violence"
"I'm going to take Jack Dorsey's ass down. He has been abusing the First Amendment of this country for his own agenda."
(www.foxnews.com)
🔥 FIRE & FURY 💥
If Lin Wood can sue the panties off Jack and win, he will be the greatest man of our generation
Just getting warmed up!
This is what we need to be doing (suing them all)
We can't just sit back with our MAGA hats and post on TDW. We have to sue them. Big Tech, the Media, politicians and plain 'ol loony lefties. If they throw a water bottle at you while you're waving a flag on the side of the road, record it and report it!
No more playing nice. There is nothing wrong with being lawsuit happy anymore!
Related: https://thedonald.win/p/HENmF9QP/trrritggeeerred-lol/c/
Yes, sue them. Why don’t they censor The Innocence Project?
Aaay your ama question is being answered right meow!
maybe there should be a special flare or section for MAGA lawyers? Great way to get business and representation to actual patriots.
Imagine if Lin Wood created a coalition of lawyers who support MAGA like our enemies have done.
Take. Down. Twitter. Kyle did nothing wrong!!!!!
We need public hearings. Close door settlements are obviously better for the plaintiff as they get paid. But nothing will change at these companies until a balls out lawyer takes their ass to public court.
No, we just need more people to sue. I've been saying this since the Maga kid settled with CNN.
Publishing lies needs to be made a into huge liability for them. It's the only way to truly save our country.
Class action? Billions?
I'm no lawyer, but anyone who had thier business burned down after "show me where it says protests have to be peaceful" might have a case.
Anybody got the link?
They have a donation just for Kyle, or a general donation for the foundation. I'm donating for Kyle until he walks free.
Might want to amend this post - I posted this exact same link a few days ago and got nailed by a mod, I guess for "no self promotion - fundraising."
That was when Lin Wood had a client and a solid case.
With Twitter locking down accounts, you will need to produce convincing evidence (which may no longer be publicly available) and convince 12 people (I assume it will be a civil case and not criminal) of how the technology works, and Jack's company is harassing a specific class of users on the platform.
Not sure any of their tech is patentable.
I believe it is a React front end, Cloud backend. Maybe some of the algorithms are patentable, but I doubt it.
Backend USED to be ruby. They also made bootstrap but its open source.
Didn't know what language the backend was written in. Figured they are using cloud server or serverless for backend execution. Conceptually, what they are doing is not extremely difficult. NoSQL for storage, trending algorithms, search functionality. Not seeing that Twitter is a big tech breakthrough. Given enough budget it can be recreated rather easily. Still doubt much is patentable.
Yeah, you a vet in tech?
You could "copy" Twitter with team of a few developers who know how to do cloud scale apps. Frankly there are even open source Twitter clones as well. Unless you have their brand and influence on your platform, you won't replace them. You'd need Kylie Jenner and a few hundred other twitteratti to go to your platform. There are a LOT of tech companies that are worth a TON of $$$ due to their user base while their product technically is a pile of garbage.
Trump could destroy twitter by leaving it.
make a twitter clone that puts a company logo watermark over every 'tweet'
somehow get Trump to switch
DMCA anyone who puts a screenshot on twitter
force them to link or quote
??
profit
Not just kylie jenners but you need governments across the world to use them for real discussions rather than just tik tok style bullshit.
Don’t see it happening with any other platform at the moment. fb, Twitter they are the social media leaders
That wouldn’t be fair from an intellectual property stand point.
However as a platform they should not have liability for users content. By enforcing zero liability, they can be stopped from removing content, banning users etc. If someone has an issue with content on the platform they take it up with the person making the post, not twitter. Zero liability for the platform, and in return no censorship and no bullshit “violates our content guidelines”.
Gab has a similar platform but without the huge user base what's it matter?
1A is the 'public square' argument, which won in Marsh vs. Alabama. A company-owned town threw Mrs. Marsh off their streets because she went round handing out religious tracts. "huhuhuh, their streets their rules, nobody owes you a platform" go the shitlibs and lolberts. Not so, said SCOTUS.
The court weighed the rights of property owners against that of freedom of speech- they can clash, and it was viewed as shades of grey- the more 'open' a property was, the more weight was given to concerns of public freedom. It's hard to think of a property more 'open', for the purposes of the First Amendment, than Twitter.
Wikipedia as always gives an insight into the minds of leftists, and their rebuttal to treating social media as the 'public square' is the recent case of MCAC vs. Halleck, where a guy who got banned off public access TV for some edgy humour sued on 1A grounds. Courts have ruled fairly consistently that TV isn't a public forum (and you can see why, intuitively- there's only one voice speaking at any one time, and open discussion is inherently impossible), and Halleck lost as TV wasn't something that was traditionally in the remit of the government, and MCAC was a private organisation.
That 'traditional remit' opinion seems usable for us, if a bit flimsy, IMO. Marsh v. Alabama referred to the public square, but with the march of technology that public square is right on our smartphones- indeed, that's how it was all originally sold to us. Twitter and facebook serve much the same purpose as the village square.
Kavanaugh referred to privately-owned public forums such as a comedy club- they weren't bound by 1A as they had a specific purpose (not in the state's remit to provide entertainment). However, where the stated purpose of the organisation is to literally be the town square or however they put it long ago, and twitter was proudly used by the rebels in the Arab Spring, and continuously as a platform for politicians and associated debate, I think it's a reasonable reading to say that yes, social media is indeed within the traditional remit of the government, which would not tolerate wealthy men banishing fractious peasants, wouldn't tolerate Gulf Corp silencing Grace Marsh, and shouldn't tolerate Silicon Valley grotesques technologically unpersoning conservatives.
As an interesting note, there's also the more recent Packingham vs North Carolina in 2017 (link below.)
In short, Packingham was a pedophile that used social media to target his underage victim. When he got out of prison he was ordered to never use social media because he was a known sex predator and that was his MO (sort of like how sex predators aren't allowed to live near schools.)
Well, the 1st Amendment guarantees freedom of association. Packingham's attorney argued that since social media sites are the modern nexus of communication - you can buy a car, rent an apartment, get a job, talk to the power company, address your local politician, etc - that not allowing the sex predator to get on social media violated his ability to associate and interact with people. SCOTUS agreed.
Think about it - child sex predators are allowed on FB and Twatter, but not conservative opinions.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/15-1194
Have to see how the case goes for precedent setting.
Luck to Mr Wood though.
Bringing down Twitter is going to need to be a multi-pronged approach.
A single lawsuit is not going to do it, but it is a start. Look for Lin to turn this into a class action suit.
Keep pushing for the FCC to reinterpret Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act.
Foment distrust in Jack Dorsey as CEO within the BoD. Question his competency. Challenge his decisions.
Put pressure on advertisers. Does Twitter really provide a good return on investment on advertising dollars?
Just off the top of my head...
Hostile takeover?
You forget about discovery and depositions. Make Twitter produce the evidence for you. With their recent hack showing the fact that they have blacklisting tools (despite lying and saying they did not), there is likely plenty of evidence that a plaintiff with deep pockets could uncover.
You sure those pockets are deep enough?
That is where discovery comes in. If Twitter refuses to hand over evidence and that comes out during the trial, then the jury will be instructed to assume the worst that the evidence would have provided.
Also, if Kyle is acquitted then it is no longer a viable defense to say that it was glorifying violence. Then you have the various funds for actual criminals like Jacob Blake that is being passed around on Twitter. The same logic applies to him since he was being arrested on a felony sexual assault warrant.
If he sues the panties off Jack, I want a statue of Lin Wood. In my front yard.
A carving
Yes!
A Wood carving
Shit, if Lin can do it, get Barr's ass out of the DOJ and put him in there. I am sick of all this talk about taking down Twitter and absolutely nothing happening. Not even a slap on the wrist violation.
*2nd greatest
Big Lin Wood fan here. This guy fucks.
I'll join in on that lawsuit. I was banned for saying Transgender is a mental disorder and listing a John Hopkins study. Why was I banned? Because it went against their community standards as it could hurt someone who is Trans... Twitter needs to go down either completely or changed to become an open platform again.
can you send the study. I've always been right wing on economics and foreign policy and moderate socially but damn times have changed.
The way i explain my stance to people is we don't give anorexic women gastric bypass surgery and weight loss pills as treatment.
We don't give men that will never be big or strong enough roids when they are already huge from the doctor.
It's all body dis-morphia and not being happy with your own body. There is absolutely no difference between a woman not having a "womanly" enough body, a man not having a manly enough body, man feeling like he needs a woman's body, and or a woman feeling like she needs a man's body.
It's all the same problem with different flavors.
People can't accept reality, being healthy and in shape should be perfectly acceptable for anyone, most people would be considered well above average by doing just that in today's society. But obsession with your body that leads to physical and mental damage is too far. Endlessly searching for happiness, acceptance, or whatever... When "all you have to do" is learn to love yourself. (i realize it's not that easy for these people, but if they loved themselves, as they were born... it wouldn't be an issue) whether it's a man getting new roids and height increasing surgery or a dude thinking if he removes his penis and having breast implants installed will make them feel whole. Nope nope never going to work. At least not for 100+ years, HUGE MAYBE, and i hope we really avoid that immoral route. Everyday i wonder if the AMISH don't have it half figured out. Put me in the woods with no fucking taxes. Leave me alone.
Your sex is genetic and that's that. You can like or enjoy or do whatever you like. I don't care. But if you think you have to change your sex to love yourself of be accepted and or allowed to do the things you love... That's a mental issue.
LGB is my line in the sand and that's that. I don't support QT out of compassion for these lost souls. Not because i hate them. The truth is the only thing that can save them.
that definitely makes sense, thanks for explaining.
Denying mental illness and the the guidelines of the APA is dangerous to trans people.
Imagine if it were taboo to diagnose someone with schizophrenia. If doing so got you labeled a bigot and a schizophobe. That you need to accept that they do actually have voices in their head from disembodied people. How insanely dangerous would that be to the people suffering from the disorder, and preventing them from getting treatment.
Even worse, you have to pretend to converse with those voices as well, or else you’re a bigot.
John Hopkins is an experimental EDM artist.
Johns Hopkins is a cutting edge medical institute in the Baltimore area.
peak clown world is believing that indulging a mental disorder rather than seeking truth and proper therapy is "harmful"
I was banned for saying, "Eminem is a gangbanger" in his Tweet feed. They said it was a personal attack, this, after he waved a loaded handgun around illegally for the 3rd time.
EMINEM IS A GANGBANGER. PERIOD, FULL STOP.
WHO WILL SUE JACK DORSEY????
LIN
MUHTHA'EFFA
I. AM. SPARTACUS!!
Lin Wood is a badass
“DONT MESS WITH ME MAN, I’M A LAYWER!”
Take em to the Wood shed!
Put 'em in the Woodchipper!
This one.
I dor sey!
Lmfao!
You know why
who remembers the last time they accidentally oopsied a liberal?
never
Think about this? For every unarmed black person killed by a cop, 270 black people are killed by black people. Are the cops really the problem?
Now do the statistics where black gun crime is removed from our gun stats and compare that to other nations, that one's my favorite.
I'd love to see cops more active in these riots. Preferably while playing Cops Tv show theme song on full blast. But nope. Cucks to the left. I'm sorry but it's true.
When it comes to police violence, cops are the problem 🙄
Based on this alone I'd vote for this guy for just about any office he cared to run for.
I hope so. You would think censoring the president would have been that bite, but here we are.
And now he looks stupid with a giant basketball stuck in his face hole
Them* lol fuck that whole company
We need more Lin Woods in this country. Go for it!
He needs to take him down legally before someone takes him down biologically.
I'm having some pretty dark, gory fantasies about what should happen to Jackoff
Did they finally censor the wrong person?!
GET 'EM
And leftists complain that Trump is a fascist. Look at the power these greasy fucks have.
They're just projecting though. They're Communist militants just like the Brown Shirts that allowed the rise of Bolshevik fascism. The left always projects.
Ugh. He’s so attractive. Handsome, southern accent, not afraid to put a boot in someone’s ass.
L Lin Wood is gonna smack Dorsey upside his head with some solid Oak.
Lin Wood is basically Thor. Don’t mess.
Get em, bro! Get em!
There are so many things I'd like to do to jack dorsey that I simply can't say here. I've been to the torture museum in Prague...many wonderful ideas for that smug,cum guzzling, sack of shit. The left out there larping like this is some October revolution with this bitch egging it on. I tell you,if civil war ever broke out,that bitch would be the first to go.
@Jack
Jack for sure.
Poked the wrong bear little Jackie!
Lin the giant killer!!!
Oh yea baby put that sweet ass Covington money to work
This is Great News!
Another accidental account suspension that only effects conservatives.
Happy to help with research or leg work Lin.
Oh god, I love to see this!!
Stop, stop, my penis can only get so erect!
(Don't stop.)
By this logic, attempting to raise money for any person who has been accused but not convicted of a violent crime is "glorifying violence" on Twitter. Of course we know the real reason Kyle is being singled out.
Guys there's nothing to see here. It was another "mistake" with the "algorithm" and they corrected the "mistake". Don't focus on the fact that this is the 1,000th "mistake" targeting a certain political side.
Does Dorsey ever consider the fact that he and other liberal media support and glorify the violence that these domestic terrorists are creating? No need to answer.
I thought President Trump gave the fcc and other agencies 30 days to review section 230? What happened with that?
Biggest plot twist of all time: 2020 is a crap year, but it's also going to be a day of reckoning for Democrats and their cronies in the media!!
B-B-B-B-Bingo! I don't mind having a policy discussion with someone who disagrees with Trump's stances, but 9 times outta 10 they just believe spoon-fed lies and slander. If the MSM told it like it is instead, Trump would be the clear favorite, no contest!!!
Fucked around. Will find out.
Someone...
really screwed the pooch.
Well, I'll be honest, he's very good at promoting a fund raiser.
We are behind you Mr. Wood, give Twitter the legal enema it deserves!
Between Kyle Rittenhouse and Lin Wood - their actions could change the trajectory of how we move forward in this world completely! Two great pedes! I’m so proud of them both and having them on our team!
DO IT. DO IT NOW!!!
It’s about time!
Go get em, Lin!
PLEQSE SUE HIS ASS INTO OBLIVION.