Note: this post was constructed by Daniel Burke (@Burke4Senate), independent candidate for US Senate, and Jose Vega (@josbtrigga), political activist. We are among a small team of people helping Mr. Binney with the AMA. All answers are dictated directly from him and confirmed by him before submission.
THANK YOU EVERYONE! This was a lot of fun! We might just come back on Friday if the moderators will have us and of course if you will have us! Checkout the livestream, if we didn't answer your question here, we may have answered it there!
From Jose: I did make a video which sums up Bill's basic points into one video. Feel free to check it out
Also, yesterday was Mr. Binney's birthday!
Follow Bill on twitter @Bill_binney
Here's the link to the YouTube Live-stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrCWZ5592q8
We'll finish up around 3. At the last 15 minutes we will just rapid fire the questions and wont type them up so we can get as much questions in before Bill has to go.
We will start the live-stream at 11:45 or so. We'll give some introductions and then start taking questions approximately at noon.
To keep updated with the work that William Binney is doing with LaRouchePAC to defeat the surveillance state and to stop the Russiagate coup, sign up here
Here's some context about who I am and what I've done, taken from my Wikipedia page.
William Edward Binney is a former intelligence official with the United States National Security Agency (NSA) and whistleblower. He retired on October 31, 2001, after more than 30 years with the agency.
He was a critic of his former employers during the George W. Bush administration, and later criticized the NSA's data-collection policies during the Barack Obama administration.
Binney was a Russia specialist and worked in the operations side of intelligence, starting as an analyst and ending as a Technical Director prior to becoming a geopolitical world Technical Director. In the 1990s, he co-founded a unit on automating signals intelligence with NSA research chief Dr. John Taggart. Binney's NSA career culminated as Technical Leader for intelligence in 2001. He has expertise in intelligence analysis, traffic analysis, systems analysis, knowledge management, and mathematics (including set theory, number theory, and probability).
In September 2002, he, along with J. Kirk Wiebe and Edward Loomis, asked the U.S. Defense Department Inspector General (DoD IG) to investigate the NSA for allegedly wasting "millions and millions of dollars" on Trailblazer, a system intended to analyze mass collection of data carried on communications networks such as the Internet. Binney had been one of the inventors of an alternative system, ThinThread, which was shelved when Trailblazer was chosen instead. Trailblazer was a modification of ThinThread, removing the encryption and auditing aspects, while expanding the mass data collection. Binney has also been publicly critical of the NSA for spying on U.S. citizens, saying of its expanded surveillance after the September 11, 2001 attacks that "it's better than anything that the KGB, the Stasi, or the Gestapo and SS ever had" as well as noting Trailblazer's ineffectiveness and unjustified high cost compared to the far less intrusive ThinThread.
In 2017 I met with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo at President Donald Trump's request to talk about my evidence that there was no "Russian Hack". He promised me follow up meetings that never happened, and I would suspect the President was ever briefed.
Links and references with forensic evidence:
https://larouchepub.com/other/2020/4731-william_binney_makes_his_case.html
https://consortiumnews.com/2017/07/24/intel-vets-challenge-russia-hack-evidence/
Do the experiment yourself!: https://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2019/04/test-it-yourself-the-2-second-rounding-fact-pattern-in-the-dnc-emails-by-william-binney-and-larry-jo.html
CrowdStrike chief admits no proof that Russia exfiltrated DNC emails: https://medium.com/@jasonaross/crowdstrike-and-russiagate-another-case-of-enormous-evidence-f53fd5fcc1c
Three key points that are essential to know:
1.) The modification times on the files point to the use of a FAT file system, which is used almost exclusively by storage devices (such as flash drives).
2.) Analysis of the files released by Guccifer 2.0 — claimed to be the Russian hacker who got the files to Wikileaks — reveals that they were created at a data transfer rate consistent with a flash drive, but not with an internet transfer.
3.) The NSA would have known the hack was taking place, and would have direct evidence of it. We know this thanks to the leaks revealed by Edward Snowden, which the NSA has never denied. See my 2017 affidavit on this issue: https://storage.googleapis.com/media.larouchepac.com/Binney%20Affidavit.pdf
So, ask me anything!
Bill Binney will dictate his answers to Daniel Burke (@Burke4Senate), Jose Vega (@josbtrigga) and Jason Ross (@JasonA_Ross)
Also, if you haven't already, please check out the documentary "A Good American"
As someone inside the room as this all went on, I see one facet of events that makes no sense to me at all and want your insight. It's been confirmed SpyGate ran on for 5 years, with many believing it was much longer. To this day not a single leak about criminal intent has reached the ears of the American public. There was not one whistleblower to speak of in 5 years time, even after the scope was expanded and consequentially the number of members involved, grew to include hundreds and likely thousands. In your opinion how is it possible there was not one person of integrity throughout the agencies? To clarify, I mean insider whistleblowers part of the crime who want to come clean, not outsiders like media.
One of the reasons many fell for conspiracies like Meuller is our guy, TrustSessions and TrustQ is because we expected our modern Deepthroat to save the day, but that day never came. Even 5 years later there are rumors a supposed plant has all the documents yet again.
When my colleagues and I came out in 2001 to report the violations we saw — of the crimes against the constitution, fraud, and so forth — we were shuffled around. The Dod IG started an investigation, and compiled a 143-page report: 05-Intel-03 issued 14 Dec 2004, published Jan 2005. The Cato Institute recently won in court to get more of that document released to the public.
The reason they've been able to do this is what they did to people like us. They came after us with the FBI, threatened us with 35-year prison sentences, and tried to fabricate evidence against us. This was the threat they held over everybody. I had proof of their malicious prosecution and was able to beat them back.
But we were made an example of. Other employees were told they'd receive treatment like me and my friends if they exposed wrong-doing.
This is what prompted Edward Snowden to leave the country when he did his whistleblowing. He knew he wouldn't get a fair shake in the criminal justice system here — a system like the Soviet, Nazi, or Chinese justice systems, in which your guilt is decided before the trial.
The shuffling of agents is precisely what I was looking for, looking for dates of when agents are relocated/reassigned is the kind of thing we should be looking for. This could have major impact down the line with the help of FOIA requests. Thank you.
There were whistleblowers. They were accused and silenced.
See here (including comments):
https://thedonald.win/p/4664aTS/blowing-past-whistleblower-prote/c/