5735
posted ago by WilliamBinney ago by WilliamBinney +5736 / -1

Note: this post was constructed by Daniel Burke (@Burke4Senate), independent candidate for US Senate, and Jose Vega (@josbtrigga), political activist. We are among a small team of people helping Mr. Binney with the AMA. All answers are dictated directly from him and confirmed by him before submission.

THANK YOU EVERYONE! This was a lot of fun! We might just come back on Friday if the moderators will have us and of course if you will have us! Checkout the livestream, if we didn't answer your question here, we may have answered it there!

From Jose: I did make a video which sums up Bill's basic points into one video. Feel free to check it out

Also, yesterday was Mr. Binney's birthday!

Follow Bill on twitter @Bill_binney

Here's the link to the YouTube Live-stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrCWZ5592q8

We'll finish up around 3. At the last 15 minutes we will just rapid fire the questions and wont type them up so we can get as much questions in before Bill has to go.

We will start the live-stream at 11:45 or so. We'll give some introductions and then start taking questions approximately at noon.

To keep updated with the work that William Binney is doing with LaRouchePAC to defeat the surveillance state and to stop the Russiagate coup, sign up here


Here's some context about who I am and what I've done, taken from my Wikipedia page.

William Edward Binney is a former intelligence official with the United States National Security Agency (NSA) and whistleblower. He retired on October 31, 2001, after more than 30 years with the agency.

He was a critic of his former employers during the George W. Bush administration, and later criticized the NSA's data-collection policies during the Barack Obama administration.

Binney was a Russia specialist and worked in the operations side of intelligence, starting as an analyst and ending as a Technical Director prior to becoming a geopolitical world Technical Director. In the 1990s, he co-founded a unit on automating signals intelligence with NSA research chief Dr. John Taggart. Binney's NSA career culminated as Technical Leader for intelligence in 2001. He has expertise in intelligence analysis, traffic analysis, systems analysis, knowledge management, and mathematics (including set theory, number theory, and probability).

In September 2002, he, along with J. Kirk Wiebe and Edward Loomis, asked the U.S. Defense Department Inspector General (DoD IG) to investigate the NSA for allegedly wasting "millions and millions of dollars" on Trailblazer, a system intended to analyze mass collection of data carried on communications networks such as the Internet. Binney had been one of the inventors of an alternative system, ThinThread, which was shelved when Trailblazer was chosen instead. Trailblazer was a modification of ThinThread, removing the encryption and auditing aspects, while expanding the mass data collection. Binney has also been publicly critical of the NSA for spying on U.S. citizens, saying of its expanded surveillance after the September 11, 2001 attacks that "it's better than anything that the KGB, the Stasi, or the Gestapo and SS ever had" as well as noting Trailblazer's ineffectiveness and unjustified high cost compared to the far less intrusive ThinThread.

In 2017 I met with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo at President Donald Trump's request to talk about my evidence that there was no "Russian Hack". He promised me follow up meetings that never happened, and I would suspect the President was ever briefed.

Links and references with forensic evidence:

https://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2019/02/why-the-dnc-was-not-hacked-by-the-russians.html

https://larouchepub.com/other/2020/4731-william_binney_makes_his_case.html

https://consortiumnews.com/2017/07/24/intel-vets-challenge-russia-hack-evidence/

Do the experiment yourself!: https://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2019/04/test-it-yourself-the-2-second-rounding-fact-pattern-in-the-dnc-emails-by-william-binney-and-larry-jo.html

CrowdStrike chief admits no proof that Russia exfiltrated DNC emails: https://medium.com/@jasonaross/crowdstrike-and-russiagate-another-case-of-enormous-evidence-f53fd5fcc1c

Three key points that are essential to know:

1.) The modification times on the files point to the use of a FAT file system, which is used almost exclusively by storage devices (such as flash drives).

2.) Analysis of the files released by Guccifer 2.0 — claimed to be the Russian hacker who got the files to Wikileaks — reveals that they were created at a data transfer rate consistent with a flash drive, but not with an internet transfer.

3.) The NSA would have known the hack was taking place, and would have direct evidence of it. We know this thanks to the leaks revealed by Edward Snowden, which the NSA has never denied. See my 2017 affidavit on this issue: https://storage.googleapis.com/media.larouchepac.com/Binney%20Affidavit.pdf

So, ask me anything!

Bill Binney will dictate his answers to Daniel Burke (@Burke4Senate), Jose Vega (@josbtrigga) and Jason Ross (@JasonA_Ross)

Also, if you haven't already, please check out the documentary "A Good American"

Comments (797)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
nothingberg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who CARES which groups did it?

Question for Binney: From a Legal Perspective, Doesn't it ONLY MATTER who Wikileaks got it from?


Isn't the analysis about the Wikileaks files? So the last "hop" is really the only one in question here

It could have been hacked by russsia, given back to hackers in the USA, and then given to wikileaks.

Does that REALLY mean Russia helped Wikileaks hack the DNC? It doesn't

Think of all the countries that have Hillary's emails (7 of them). Her information was everywhere. It could have gotten from anyone

The red herring to me is that the FBI (or any other independent agency, such as the NSA) still has not been able to view the Crowdstrike server on which they claim they have information that the DNC servers were hacked

6
WilliamBinney [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes in terms of the issue of Wikileaks posting that it matters who gave it to them. But How it happened and Russian involvement, now that gets into perjury such as Guccifer 2 allegations and the indictments that came out from Rosenstein.

Fundamental principles of a fair trial are at stake here because if we allow them to get away with doing this then our republic will fall apart and we'll be abused by the republic of "just-us"

2
nothingberg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you guys for fielding my question!

You're the best and we're so glad and thankful you're here

Department of "Just Us"

So true!