Note: this post was constructed by Daniel Burke (@Burke4Senate), independent candidate for US Senate, and Jose Vega (@josbtrigga), political activist. We are among a small team of people helping Mr. Binney with the AMA. All answers are dictated directly from him and confirmed by him before submission.
THANK YOU EVERYONE! This was a lot of fun! We might just come back on Friday if the moderators will have us and of course if you will have us! Checkout the livestream, if we didn't answer your question here, we may have answered it there!
From Jose: I did make a video which sums up Bill's basic points into one video. Feel free to check it out
Also, yesterday was Mr. Binney's birthday!
Follow Bill on twitter @Bill_binney
Here's the link to the YouTube Live-stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrCWZ5592q8
We'll finish up around 3. At the last 15 minutes we will just rapid fire the questions and wont type them up so we can get as much questions in before Bill has to go.
We will start the live-stream at 11:45 or so. We'll give some introductions and then start taking questions approximately at noon.
To keep updated with the work that William Binney is doing with LaRouchePAC to defeat the surveillance state and to stop the Russiagate coup, sign up here
Here's some context about who I am and what I've done, taken from my Wikipedia page.
William Edward Binney is a former intelligence official with the United States National Security Agency (NSA) and whistleblower. He retired on October 31, 2001, after more than 30 years with the agency.
He was a critic of his former employers during the George W. Bush administration, and later criticized the NSA's data-collection policies during the Barack Obama administration.
Binney was a Russia specialist and worked in the operations side of intelligence, starting as an analyst and ending as a Technical Director prior to becoming a geopolitical world Technical Director. In the 1990s, he co-founded a unit on automating signals intelligence with NSA research chief Dr. John Taggart. Binney's NSA career culminated as Technical Leader for intelligence in 2001. He has expertise in intelligence analysis, traffic analysis, systems analysis, knowledge management, and mathematics (including set theory, number theory, and probability).
In September 2002, he, along with J. Kirk Wiebe and Edward Loomis, asked the U.S. Defense Department Inspector General (DoD IG) to investigate the NSA for allegedly wasting "millions and millions of dollars" on Trailblazer, a system intended to analyze mass collection of data carried on communications networks such as the Internet. Binney had been one of the inventors of an alternative system, ThinThread, which was shelved when Trailblazer was chosen instead. Trailblazer was a modification of ThinThread, removing the encryption and auditing aspects, while expanding the mass data collection. Binney has also been publicly critical of the NSA for spying on U.S. citizens, saying of its expanded surveillance after the September 11, 2001 attacks that "it's better than anything that the KGB, the Stasi, or the Gestapo and SS ever had" as well as noting Trailblazer's ineffectiveness and unjustified high cost compared to the far less intrusive ThinThread.
In 2017 I met with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo at President Donald Trump's request to talk about my evidence that there was no "Russian Hack". He promised me follow up meetings that never happened, and I would suspect the President was ever briefed.
Links and references with forensic evidence:
https://larouchepub.com/other/2020/4731-william_binney_makes_his_case.html
https://consortiumnews.com/2017/07/24/intel-vets-challenge-russia-hack-evidence/
Do the experiment yourself!: https://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2019/04/test-it-yourself-the-2-second-rounding-fact-pattern-in-the-dnc-emails-by-william-binney-and-larry-jo.html
CrowdStrike chief admits no proof that Russia exfiltrated DNC emails: https://medium.com/@jasonaross/crowdstrike-and-russiagate-another-case-of-enormous-evidence-f53fd5fcc1c
Three key points that are essential to know:
1.) The modification times on the files point to the use of a FAT file system, which is used almost exclusively by storage devices (such as flash drives).
2.) Analysis of the files released by Guccifer 2.0 — claimed to be the Russian hacker who got the files to Wikileaks — reveals that they were created at a data transfer rate consistent with a flash drive, but not with an internet transfer.
3.) The NSA would have known the hack was taking place, and would have direct evidence of it. We know this thanks to the leaks revealed by Edward Snowden, which the NSA has never denied. See my 2017 affidavit on this issue: https://storage.googleapis.com/media.larouchepac.com/Binney%20Affidavit.pdf
So, ask me anything!
Bill Binney will dictate his answers to Daniel Burke (@Burke4Senate), Jose Vega (@josbtrigga) and Jason Ross (@JasonA_Ross)
Also, if you haven't already, please check out the documentary "A Good American"
Given the Russians did not hack the DNC, and given that the level of 2016 Russian Government / Intelligence Agency /ies Internet-based election influence was less then negligible, why, on 29 December 2016, were 35 Russians declared Persona Non Grata, given two days to leave the country and two diplomatic facilities closed?
An analysis based on Occam's Razor (of two competing theories, the simplest is preferred) and on Nguyen van Phred's Maxim ("The secret bombings in Cambodia were no secret to the Cambodians.") poses some interesting potentialities.
Apply Occam's Razor and the simple theory floats that the Russia Hoax plotters wanted to amplify the smear effect of claiming massive Russian Government / Intelligence Agency /ies, pro-Trump election interference at the same time forcing a poison pill down the throat of any possibility for there to be anything approaching normal U.S. / Russian government-to-government relations. Not bad for a two-fer.
It would also taint any effort made public by the Russian Government / Intelligence Agency /ies to be proactive providing information antithetical to the Russia Hoax narrative, as it would be proof positive of a pro-Trump position. So its more a hat-trick than a tow-fer.
However, with a hat tip to van Prhed, it seems prudent to take into account. that not only did the Russian Government / Intelligence Agency /ies know that they did not hack the DNC, they knew exactly what their level of " election interference" was.
Additionally, it would also seem to prudent to factor in that the Russian Government / Intelligence Agency /ies were well aware of the active measures the DNC, in coordination with rouge elements of the U.S. Government, were engaged in elements of the Russia Hoax.
"The Russia Hoax was no secret to the Russians" and they had the capability to know a great deal about what was going on. Its not like they had to go to a FISA court to get a warrant to monitor communications of American government officials in the United States and more importantly... when the hoax plotters were operating in Europe.
Have you given this side show of the greater Russia Hoax much consideration.
Let's put it this way, any missions overseas are peppered with spies and they know who the spies are and so do we. So if something happens between two countries you know who to make an example out of. So we shouldn't be surprised by that!
They know exactly who is who and where!