Note: this post was constructed by Daniel Burke (@Burke4Senate), independent candidate for US Senate, and Jose Vega (@josbtrigga), political activist. We are among a small team of people helping Mr. Binney with the AMA. All answers are dictated directly from him and confirmed by him before submission.
THANK YOU EVERYONE! This was a lot of fun! We might just come back on Friday if the moderators will have us and of course if you will have us! Checkout the livestream, if we didn't answer your question here, we may have answered it there!
From Jose: I did make a video which sums up Bill's basic points into one video. Feel free to check it out
Also, yesterday was Mr. Binney's birthday!
Follow Bill on twitter @Bill_binney
Here's the link to the YouTube Live-stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrCWZ5592q8
We'll finish up around 3. At the last 15 minutes we will just rapid fire the questions and wont type them up so we can get as much questions in before Bill has to go.
We will start the live-stream at 11:45 or so. We'll give some introductions and then start taking questions approximately at noon.
To keep updated with the work that William Binney is doing with LaRouchePAC to defeat the surveillance state and to stop the Russiagate coup, sign up here
Here's some context about who I am and what I've done, taken from my Wikipedia page.
William Edward Binney is a former intelligence official with the United States National Security Agency (NSA) and whistleblower. He retired on October 31, 2001, after more than 30 years with the agency.
He was a critic of his former employers during the George W. Bush administration, and later criticized the NSA's data-collection policies during the Barack Obama administration.
Binney was a Russia specialist and worked in the operations side of intelligence, starting as an analyst and ending as a Technical Director prior to becoming a geopolitical world Technical Director. In the 1990s, he co-founded a unit on automating signals intelligence with NSA research chief Dr. John Taggart. Binney's NSA career culminated as Technical Leader for intelligence in 2001. He has expertise in intelligence analysis, traffic analysis, systems analysis, knowledge management, and mathematics (including set theory, number theory, and probability).
In September 2002, he, along with J. Kirk Wiebe and Edward Loomis, asked the U.S. Defense Department Inspector General (DoD IG) to investigate the NSA for allegedly wasting "millions and millions of dollars" on Trailblazer, a system intended to analyze mass collection of data carried on communications networks such as the Internet. Binney had been one of the inventors of an alternative system, ThinThread, which was shelved when Trailblazer was chosen instead. Trailblazer was a modification of ThinThread, removing the encryption and auditing aspects, while expanding the mass data collection. Binney has also been publicly critical of the NSA for spying on U.S. citizens, saying of its expanded surveillance after the September 11, 2001 attacks that "it's better than anything that the KGB, the Stasi, or the Gestapo and SS ever had" as well as noting Trailblazer's ineffectiveness and unjustified high cost compared to the far less intrusive ThinThread.
In 2017 I met with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo at President Donald Trump's request to talk about my evidence that there was no "Russian Hack". He promised me follow up meetings that never happened, and I would suspect the President was ever briefed.
Links and references with forensic evidence:
https://larouchepub.com/other/2020/4731-william_binney_makes_his_case.html
https://consortiumnews.com/2017/07/24/intel-vets-challenge-russia-hack-evidence/
Do the experiment yourself!: https://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2019/04/test-it-yourself-the-2-second-rounding-fact-pattern-in-the-dnc-emails-by-william-binney-and-larry-jo.html
CrowdStrike chief admits no proof that Russia exfiltrated DNC emails: https://medium.com/@jasonaross/crowdstrike-and-russiagate-another-case-of-enormous-evidence-f53fd5fcc1c
Three key points that are essential to know:
1.) The modification times on the files point to the use of a FAT file system, which is used almost exclusively by storage devices (such as flash drives).
2.) Analysis of the files released by Guccifer 2.0 — claimed to be the Russian hacker who got the files to Wikileaks — reveals that they were created at a data transfer rate consistent with a flash drive, but not with an internet transfer.
3.) The NSA would have known the hack was taking place, and would have direct evidence of it. We know this thanks to the leaks revealed by Edward Snowden, which the NSA has never denied. See my 2017 affidavit on this issue: https://storage.googleapis.com/media.larouchepac.com/Binney%20Affidavit.pdf
So, ask me anything!
Bill Binney will dictate his answers to Daniel Burke (@Burke4Senate), Jose Vega (@josbtrigga) and Jason Ross (@JasonA_Ross)
Also, if you haven't already, please check out the documentary "A Good American"
Please take a moment to read and consider this idea, and respond:
Consider that complex multiagent systems result in emergent unpredictable behaviors. These behaviors, in aggregate, manifest consequences in the real world that exhibit features consistent with those of ‘life-like’ structures such as viruses or prions, including energy & resource acquisition, defensive structural formations, cyclical ezymatic processing, and system growth/replication.
Given that the cyber domain is a brand-new rapidly-evolving ecosystem, and that within new natural ecosystems parasitic life forms historically evolve early alongside the host organisms, and given the way surveillance capitalism, natsec exploitation, and political corruption have fueled the tech/surveillance ‘monster’, provided it with compartmentalized insulation, and delivered lifecycle processes to enable growth, evolution, and attachment to our ‘body politic’...
Could our society have already passed the so-called ‘technological singularity’, except that instead of a ‘human-like’ artificial intelligence, we have been overtaken by a parasitic, swarm hive-mind ‘intelligence’ to which humans and their institutions unwittingly serve as physical instruments; a multiagent system that we are dependent upon, cannot extricate ourselves from, and cannot shut down?
Bitch no way he answers this wall of text. Make it shorter.
This idea also provides an alternative explanation to ‘evil motivations’ for why members of both parties, including RINOs, ‘trusted conservatives’, Bill Barr, and even Trump himself seem entirely unable to reign in things like FISA, persistent mass surveillance, and tech censorship/opinion ‘nudging’/data collection.
This is a serious question, with many real-world examples and real national security implications, that deserves consideration by experts of Bill Binney’s stature.
It requires some explanation to seperate it from simplistic-sounding ‘sci-fi’ interpretation, and I have included that minimal explanation as concisely as possible, as well as bolding the key question.
Binney can read two paragraphs— that’s hardly a wall of text.
With this level of anarchy, you have to be kidding.
What does that mean? These systems have been building an ecosystem for 30 years, and considered in this way, would be about as concerned with our riots and conflict as would an ant colony.
In fact, conflict only fuels the system. (Look at Turkey/Syria from a ”drone colony’s” perspective)