Note: this post was constructed by Daniel Burke (@Burke4Senate), independent candidate for US Senate, and Jose Vega (@josbtrigga), political activist. We are among a small team of people helping Mr. Binney with the AMA. All answers are dictated directly from him and confirmed by him before submission.
THANK YOU EVERYONE! This was a lot of fun! We might just come back on Friday if the moderators will have us and of course if you will have us! Checkout the livestream, if we didn't answer your question here, we may have answered it there!
From Jose: I did make a video which sums up Bill's basic points into one video. Feel free to check it out
Also, yesterday was Mr. Binney's birthday!
Follow Bill on twitter @Bill_binney
Here's the link to the YouTube Live-stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrCWZ5592q8
We'll finish up around 3. At the last 15 minutes we will just rapid fire the questions and wont type them up so we can get as much questions in before Bill has to go.
We will start the live-stream at 11:45 or so. We'll give some introductions and then start taking questions approximately at noon.
To keep updated with the work that William Binney is doing with LaRouchePAC to defeat the surveillance state and to stop the Russiagate coup, sign up here
Here's some context about who I am and what I've done, taken from my Wikipedia page.
William Edward Binney is a former intelligence official with the United States National Security Agency (NSA) and whistleblower. He retired on October 31, 2001, after more than 30 years with the agency.
He was a critic of his former employers during the George W. Bush administration, and later criticized the NSA's data-collection policies during the Barack Obama administration.
Binney was a Russia specialist and worked in the operations side of intelligence, starting as an analyst and ending as a Technical Director prior to becoming a geopolitical world Technical Director. In the 1990s, he co-founded a unit on automating signals intelligence with NSA research chief Dr. John Taggart. Binney's NSA career culminated as Technical Leader for intelligence in 2001. He has expertise in intelligence analysis, traffic analysis, systems analysis, knowledge management, and mathematics (including set theory, number theory, and probability).
In September 2002, he, along with J. Kirk Wiebe and Edward Loomis, asked the U.S. Defense Department Inspector General (DoD IG) to investigate the NSA for allegedly wasting "millions and millions of dollars" on Trailblazer, a system intended to analyze mass collection of data carried on communications networks such as the Internet. Binney had been one of the inventors of an alternative system, ThinThread, which was shelved when Trailblazer was chosen instead. Trailblazer was a modification of ThinThread, removing the encryption and auditing aspects, while expanding the mass data collection. Binney has also been publicly critical of the NSA for spying on U.S. citizens, saying of its expanded surveillance after the September 11, 2001 attacks that "it's better than anything that the KGB, the Stasi, or the Gestapo and SS ever had" as well as noting Trailblazer's ineffectiveness and unjustified high cost compared to the far less intrusive ThinThread.
In 2017 I met with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo at President Donald Trump's request to talk about my evidence that there was no "Russian Hack". He promised me follow up meetings that never happened, and I would suspect the President was ever briefed.
Links and references with forensic evidence:
https://larouchepub.com/other/2020/4731-william_binney_makes_his_case.html
https://consortiumnews.com/2017/07/24/intel-vets-challenge-russia-hack-evidence/
Do the experiment yourself!: https://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2019/04/test-it-yourself-the-2-second-rounding-fact-pattern-in-the-dnc-emails-by-william-binney-and-larry-jo.html
CrowdStrike chief admits no proof that Russia exfiltrated DNC emails: https://medium.com/@jasonaross/crowdstrike-and-russiagate-another-case-of-enormous-evidence-f53fd5fcc1c
Three key points that are essential to know:
1.) The modification times on the files point to the use of a FAT file system, which is used almost exclusively by storage devices (such as flash drives).
2.) Analysis of the files released by Guccifer 2.0 — claimed to be the Russian hacker who got the files to Wikileaks — reveals that they were created at a data transfer rate consistent with a flash drive, but not with an internet transfer.
3.) The NSA would have known the hack was taking place, and would have direct evidence of it. We know this thanks to the leaks revealed by Edward Snowden, which the NSA has never denied. See my 2017 affidavit on this issue: https://storage.googleapis.com/media.larouchepac.com/Binney%20Affidavit.pdf
So, ask me anything!
Bill Binney will dictate his answers to Daniel Burke (@Burke4Senate), Jose Vega (@josbtrigga) and Jason Ross (@JasonA_Ross)
Also, if you haven't already, please check out the documentary "A Good American"
First of all, you have to break it down into parts: You had the DNC files that were posted by WikiLeaks. You also have Guccifer 2.0 data.
The WikiLeaks files were released in three batches: May 23, May 25, Aug 26. The file times ended in even numbers of seconds: 2,4,6,8,0. That is a property of the FAT file system, typically used in storage devices like storage devices and CD-ROMs. The FAT system rounds off times to an even number of seconds. This artifact was seen in all of the 30,000+ files released by WikiLeaks. That suggests it was downloaded to a thumb drive and then physically transferred to WikiLeaks.
Now, Guccifer 2.0 is something else. This character appeared after Assange announced that he'd be publishing material on Clinton. His material appeared July 5 and Sept 1. He claimed that he had performed two hacks of the DNC. But if you look only at the minutes, seconds, and milliseconds of the data in the July and September releases, they fit together fine. This means that from one collection of data, he made a range change on the dates to make it appear that he had committed a second "hack."
But we also saw in his June 15, 2016 posting material that had Russian fingerprints. Google "Forensicator" and "Adam Carter" to learn more about how those fingerprints were deliberately added, because the WikiLeaks releases of the same files did not contain them.
We know from the Vault 7 release of the Marble Framework, whereby the CIA can perform hacks and make it look like it was the work of another country. Among the countries that could be spoofed included Russia. That program was used once during 2016, and we believe that this Guccifer 2.0 operation was this instance.
If you Google "Mary Fanning" and "the Hammer" you'll be able to learn more about a program for internal spying, set up at the CIA, to spy on Mr. Trump and Candidate Trump. I hope Durham and Barr are investigating this. It's certainly outside the law and the constitution. In fact, I think this program took advantage of NSA tap points.
This is an important piece. The surveillance state under Obama, Brennan and Clapper was outrageous but his info is mind blowing:
https://theamericanreport.org/2020/08/31/explosive-new-website-names-alleged-u-s-domestic-surveillance-targets-mueller-brennan-clapper-architects-of-vast-criminal-operation-where-are-barr-durham/
THE HAMMER is the Key to the Coup "The Political Crime of the Century": How Obama, Brennan, Clapper, and the CIA spied on President Trump, General Flynn ... and everyone else - Kindle
https://www.amazon.com/HAMMER-Coup-Political-Crime-Century-ebook/dp/B08GCC689D