The issue was offenders of heterosexual sex with minors could avoid the sex registry list while homosexual offenders could not. I say put them both on there regardless unless it's like a 17 year old and 18 year old.
You're a pede, but you brought up a simple line of reasoning that might explain a discrepancy in another patriots point.
Dems don't do this anymore. If someone says something false or stupid, they just shut their mouths and nod their heads, as long as they think it will further their agenda.
The issue was offenders of heterosexual sex with minors could avoid the sex registry list while homosexual offenders could not. I say put them both on there regardless unless it's like a 17 year old and 18 year old.
This really is just another step towards normalizing pedophilia. Guess what state ranks number one in sex offenders... California. -- My state :(
https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/state-by-state-numbers-of-registered-sex-offenders-in-the-us.html
You should be asking if raising the age of consent to 18 like CA artificially increases the number of sex offenses. Other states have lower ages.
This is the big reason I switched from D to R.
You're a pede, but you brought up a simple line of reasoning that might explain a discrepancy in another patriots point.
Dems don't do this anymore. If someone says something false or stupid, they just shut their mouths and nod their heads, as long as they think it will further their agenda.
We have a lot of 'imports' as well.
per/100,000 by state would be interesting
Exactly, put them both on