4063
Comments (255)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
22
Groupthinkgroupthink 22 points ago +23 / -1

There's been a group brigading this site this past week, arguing with people that sex offenders are misunderstood and that most things and most of them technically aren't pedophiles or into pedophilia.

You know you're on the right side of an argument when you're arguing the technicality of a sexual offender being a pedophile or not.

12
Maga_trump2020 [S] 12 points ago +12 / -0

We call those people democrats

4
Groupthinkgroupthink 4 points ago +4 / -0

I see what you did there, /sly smile

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-4
flashersenpai -4 points ago +2 / -6

It's called having an understanding of the law instead of riding an hysterical emotional wave into the breakdown of the legal system.

5
Groupthinkgroupthink 5 points ago +5 / -0

Except that's not why they're doing it.

They haven't come here, to the Donald, to have an intellectual debate about the operational definitions of certain behaviors -- or the jeopardy that behavior, properly defined, may or may not place them under the law, under the current statues of the law.

Are you saying they're going here to do that?

Even if they are coming here to do that, they are just hiding between definitions created to codify their behavior, which to me makes them more of a danger, as they're either looking for a way to justify their behavior under the law, or operate in semantic way that allows their behavior to continue under the law, even though that was never the spirit of the law.

The law is there to protect minors, not give you legal ways to fuck minors.