Too old of a comment to really bother with. Don't care if you don't believe me on my history as a libertarian. Rothbard, RP, Tom Woods, Jason Stapleton, Herman-Hoppe, some of my favorites for various reasons.
If that's what you really understood about what I actually argued, is it any wonder that he's claiming all that shit about libertarians?
This argument doesn't make any sense. Even if I did misunderstand your argument, what does that have to do with him "claiming all that shit about libertarians"? It's not a logical argument.
Anybody can claim to be one without having to meet any criteria.
This is another nonexistent argument. Even if I was pretending to be a former libertarian, you say that me misunderstanding your argument means I don't meet a requirement to be a former libertarian? Honestly, wtf are you talking about?
Keep learning grasshopper. I was a cringe libertarian once, too. For way too long. I've been in your mindstate before. People that aren't libertarians just don't get it! No, I get it. My political philosophy just evolved.
Don't care if you don't believe me on my history as a libertarian.
Not only did I believe it, my whole response was based on believing your claim.
Rothbard, RP, Tom Woods, Jason Stapleton, Herman-Hoppe, some of my favorites for various reasons.
Does being a fan equate with actual understanding? Of course not. Libertarianism is a demanding topic to understand. Regurgitating slogans is easy. Just like how I'm an expert basketball player by watching my NBA heroes.
Even if I did misunderstand your argument, what does that have to do with him "claiming all that shit about libertarians"?
He was arguing about things that were not libertarian positions, but are easily confused as such. Why are they confused in that way? Because when you misunderstand things and say nonsense while fervently claiming to be for libertarinism, why would he doubt that what you say is the cannon?
Even if I was pretending to be a former libertarian
I didn't doubt at all that you were indeed.
I was a cringe libertarian once
You shaved off the libertarian part but it should have been the cringe part instead.
He was arguing about things that were not libertarian positions, but are easily confused as such.
He's not a libertarian. He was arguing for stepping in on social media. And you called him a government bootlicker or whatever. So why is he supposed to argue for libertarian positions? He was arguing against them and you called him a government bootlicker. Thats all i was commenting on. I don't understand what you're even arguing.
Because when you misunderstand things and say nonsense while fervently claiming to be for libertarinism, why would he doubt that what you say is the cannon?
I'm not FOR libertarianism. Why are you acting like we are all libertarians here? The guy you called a bootlicker obviously wasn't and neither am I anymore.
Libertarianism is a demanding topic to understand.
Yes. That was my point from the start. You didn't understand at all. But that's fine. It's now your turn to think hard on why this is so and fix it.
I'm not FOR libertarianism.
You yourself said you were. So obviously I was referring to people like your past self who spout nonsensical slogans without understanding. Sure, those things come from some legitimate arguments but all the way down the food-chain they get perverted into easily disprovable silliness. Like "the state produces nothing" slogan back in the day.
Rick And Morty
Looks like even you know how ... high your level is.
This is why libertarianism is getting a bad rep. Anybody can claim to be one without having to meet any criteria. Take you for example:
If that's what you really understood about what I actually argued, is it any wonder that he's claiming all that shit about libertarians?
Too old of a comment to really bother with. Don't care if you don't believe me on my history as a libertarian. Rothbard, RP, Tom Woods, Jason Stapleton, Herman-Hoppe, some of my favorites for various reasons.
This argument doesn't make any sense. Even if I did misunderstand your argument, what does that have to do with him "claiming all that shit about libertarians"? It's not a logical argument.
This is another nonexistent argument. Even if I was pretending to be a former libertarian, you say that me misunderstanding your argument means I don't meet a requirement to be a former libertarian? Honestly, wtf are you talking about?
Keep learning grasshopper. I was a cringe libertarian once, too. For way too long. I've been in your mindstate before. People that aren't libertarians just don't get it! No, I get it. My political philosophy just evolved.
Not only did I believe it, my whole response was based on believing your claim.
Does being a fan equate with actual understanding? Of course not. Libertarianism is a demanding topic to understand. Regurgitating slogans is easy. Just like how I'm an expert basketball player by watching my NBA heroes.
He was arguing about things that were not libertarian positions, but are easily confused as such. Why are they confused in that way? Because when you misunderstand things and say nonsense while fervently claiming to be for libertarinism, why would he doubt that what you say is the cannon?
I didn't doubt at all that you were indeed.
You shaved off the libertarian part but it should have been the cringe part instead.
He's not a libertarian. He was arguing for stepping in on social media. And you called him a government bootlicker or whatever. So why is he supposed to argue for libertarian positions? He was arguing against them and you called him a government bootlicker. Thats all i was commenting on. I don't understand what you're even arguing.
I'm not FOR libertarianism. Why are you acting like we are all libertarians here? The guy you called a bootlicker obviously wasn't and neither am I anymore.
Insert Rick And Morty copypasta.
Yes. That was my point from the start. You didn't understand at all. But that's fine. It's now your turn to think hard on why this is so and fix it.
You yourself said you were. So obviously I was referring to people like your past self who spout nonsensical slogans without understanding. Sure, those things come from some legitimate arguments but all the way down the food-chain they get perverted into easily disprovable silliness. Like "the state produces nothing" slogan back in the day.
Looks like even you know how ... high your level is.