Don't care if you don't believe me on my history as a libertarian.
Not only did I believe it, my whole response was based on believing your claim.
Rothbard, RP, Tom Woods, Jason Stapleton, Herman-Hoppe, some of my favorites for various reasons.
Does being a fan equate with actual understanding? Of course not. Libertarianism is a demanding topic to understand. Regurgitating slogans is easy. Just like how I'm an expert basketball player by watching my NBA heroes.
Even if I did misunderstand your argument, what does that have to do with him "claiming all that shit about libertarians"?
He was arguing about things that were not libertarian positions, but are easily confused as such. Why are they confused in that way? Because when you misunderstand things and say nonsense while fervently claiming to be for libertarinism, why would he doubt that what you say is the cannon?
Even if I was pretending to be a former libertarian
I didn't doubt at all that you were indeed.
I was a cringe libertarian once
You shaved off the libertarian part but it should have been the cringe part instead.
He was arguing about things that were not libertarian positions, but are easily confused as such.
He's not a libertarian. He was arguing for stepping in on social media. And you called him a government bootlicker or whatever. So why is he supposed to argue for libertarian positions? He was arguing against them and you called him a government bootlicker. Thats all i was commenting on. I don't understand what you're even arguing.
Because when you misunderstand things and say nonsense while fervently claiming to be for libertarinism, why would he doubt that what you say is the cannon?
I'm not FOR libertarianism. Why are you acting like we are all libertarians here? The guy you called a bootlicker obviously wasn't and neither am I anymore.
Libertarianism is a demanding topic to understand.
Yes. That was my point from the start. You didn't understand at all. But that's fine. It's now your turn to think hard on why this is so and fix it.
I'm not FOR libertarianism.
You yourself said you were. So obviously I was referring to people like your past self who spout nonsensical slogans without understanding. Sure, those things come from some legitimate arguments but all the way down the food-chain they get perverted into easily disprovable silliness. Like "the state produces nothing" slogan back in the day.
Rick And Morty
Looks like even you know how ... high your level is.
You're extremely dull dude. You called him a bootlicker because he said he wants the government to do something about social media. All I was saying is that you're a faggot for saying that. My comment has nothing to do with my level of understanding of libertarianism.
Looks like even you know how ... high your level is.
It's a well known copypasta making fun of you.
Are you some broken AI bot or something? Honestly, your arguments are nonsensical. I'm dumber for having interacted with you. This has been painful.
You keep talking about my level of understanding of libertarianism (insert copypasta again) when nothing I've said has anything to do with how little or how much I understand the deeply complex, nuanced interworkings of the sophisticated political ideology of libertarianism.
All I did was call you a douche for calling him a bootlicker.
Can a bidet recognize - much less admire - the Mona Lisa?
All I was saying is that you're a faggot for saying that.
How did that work out for you? I mean, apart from getting a mental masturbation reward for displaying your silliness.
My comment has nothing to do with my level of understanding of libertarianism.
Oh really? Had you the capacity to not be a mere third-rate foot soldier, wouldn't that cognitive level of ability prevent you from spewing nonsense?
You called him a bootlicker because he said he wants the government to do something about social media.
See, here's the thing. My position was not that and it was clearly expressed so. It is extremely interesting that you still haven't been able to see this. Are you not familiar with the art of reading comprehension?
copypasta
I am not familiar with the use of copypasta, as I actually use my brain every moment. But you certainly seem very familiar with said pasta, who could ever take a guess as to why...
when nothing I've said has anything to do with how little or how much I understand the deeply complex, nuanced interworkings of the sophisticated political ideology of libertarianism.
It oozes. Just like one doesn't put a tractor on the racing track. Ain't nobody expecting you to actually .... race.
All I did was call you a douche for calling him a bootlicker.
That part is OK. You're free to have your own opinions, regardless of how detached they are from reality.
Not only did I believe it, my whole response was based on believing your claim.
Does being a fan equate with actual understanding? Of course not. Libertarianism is a demanding topic to understand. Regurgitating slogans is easy. Just like how I'm an expert basketball player by watching my NBA heroes.
He was arguing about things that were not libertarian positions, but are easily confused as such. Why are they confused in that way? Because when you misunderstand things and say nonsense while fervently claiming to be for libertarinism, why would he doubt that what you say is the cannon?
I didn't doubt at all that you were indeed.
You shaved off the libertarian part but it should have been the cringe part instead.
He's not a libertarian. He was arguing for stepping in on social media. And you called him a government bootlicker or whatever. So why is he supposed to argue for libertarian positions? He was arguing against them and you called him a government bootlicker. Thats all i was commenting on. I don't understand what you're even arguing.
I'm not FOR libertarianism. Why are you acting like we are all libertarians here? The guy you called a bootlicker obviously wasn't and neither am I anymore.
Insert Rick And Morty copypasta.
Yes. That was my point from the start. You didn't understand at all. But that's fine. It's now your turn to think hard on why this is so and fix it.
You yourself said you were. So obviously I was referring to people like your past self who spout nonsensical slogans without understanding. Sure, those things come from some legitimate arguments but all the way down the food-chain they get perverted into easily disprovable silliness. Like "the state produces nothing" slogan back in the day.
Looks like even you know how ... high your level is.
You're extremely dull dude. You called him a bootlicker because he said he wants the government to do something about social media. All I was saying is that you're a faggot for saying that. My comment has nothing to do with my level of understanding of libertarianism.
It's a well known copypasta making fun of you.
Are you some broken AI bot or something? Honestly, your arguments are nonsensical. I'm dumber for having interacted with you. This has been painful.
You keep talking about my level of understanding of libertarianism (insert copypasta again) when nothing I've said has anything to do with how little or how much I understand the deeply complex, nuanced interworkings of the sophisticated political ideology of libertarianism.
All I did was call you a douche for calling him a bootlicker.
Can a bidet recognize - much less admire - the Mona Lisa?
How did that work out for you? I mean, apart from getting a mental masturbation reward for displaying your silliness.
Oh really? Had you the capacity to not be a mere third-rate foot soldier, wouldn't that cognitive level of ability prevent you from spewing nonsense?
See, here's the thing. My position was not that and it was clearly expressed so. It is extremely interesting that you still haven't been able to see this. Are you not familiar with the art of reading comprehension?
I am not familiar with the use of copypasta, as I actually use my brain every moment. But you certainly seem very familiar with said pasta, who could ever take a guess as to why...
It oozes. Just like one doesn't put a tractor on the racing track. Ain't nobody expecting you to actually .... race.
That part is OK. You're free to have your own opinions, regardless of how detached they are from reality.