233
Comments (10)
sorted by:
18
wonderfreeheromale 18 points ago +18 / -0

"Existing California law permits individuals convicted of having non-forcible vaginal intercourse with a minor (within certain age parameters) to seek discretionary relief in court from automatically having to register as sex offenders." How the hell does it matter if it's non-forcible if it's a minor? It's still legally rape. California loves it's pedos..

3
FiatLux 3 points ago +5 / -2

Pretty sure when I was 18 my gf was 16 just sayin

12
JKillen 12 points ago +12 / -0

That's a far far cry from a 21 and 11 though

3
FiatLux 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly. The left once again has used a reasonable provision of the law and expanded it to clown world proportions

6
BlueCow2ElectricBoo 6 points ago +6 / -0

Romeo and Juliet laws are there to protect same-age partners. It's not there to protect a decade age gap.

9
awooo 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's Rosenbaum's law. Joseph Rosenbaum went to prison for sex with five boys between 9-11 when he was 19, right? Under this California law, he's a model citizen again!

3
ihatespeech 3 points ago +3 / -0

"It's not pedophilia, it's ephebophilia!" -pedophiles and politifact

2
Vonzipper 2 points ago +2 / -0

CEO Neil Brown is a Democrat hack

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
HuggableBear 1 point ago +2 / -1

It's false because a 21 year old can't fuck an 11 year old, the minimum age is 14, so it's only 24 year olds fucking 14 year olds that will be legal