Why does he use "anarchist" to describe them? They really aren't anarchists in a true sense at all. Maybe some but for the most part, anarchists and commies usually end up not getting along .. lol
antifa has been playing fast and loose with the meanings of things. they have taken pains to load up "blm" and "antifa" with positive connotations, despite the negative reality. this is particularly blatant with "antifa", i feel a twinge of anger every time they lay claim on the soldiers and sailors of World War II.
so whenever anybody tries to criticize antifa for organizing riots, they just fall back on their claim that "everybody is antifascist!"
communism, likewise, has been grotesquely rehabilitated through social media. even despite such horrors as north korea and the ukraine famine. even those horrors have been partly rehabilitated with these people...somehow. gulag? guillotines? just fun memes.
somehow, however, the communists failed to account for the word 'anarchist'. this word means very little to most people, I would say. except that it seemingly has something to do with anarchy. and for most people, anarchy means chaos, it has negative connotations.
by using the term 'anarchist' instead of the 'antifa' and 'blm' terms, our president sidesteps the social media programming and singles out the chaotic elements of the protests and riots for his condemnation.
(you will also find some good actual history using those hashtags. this war is fought on many fronts.)
the 'kulaks' tag is particularly troubling as it is used to compare people directly with the ukrainian peasant farmers whose 'greed' , according to stalin, caused the genocidal ukranian famine. which was, of course, deliberately inflicted by stalin.
Why does he use "anarchist" to describe them? They really aren't anarchists in a true sense at all. Maybe some but for the most part, anarchists and commies usually end up not getting along .. lol
the word choice is fairly clever i think.
antifa has been playing fast and loose with the meanings of things. they have taken pains to load up "blm" and "antifa" with positive connotations, despite the negative reality. this is particularly blatant with "antifa", i feel a twinge of anger every time they lay claim on the soldiers and sailors of World War II.
so whenever anybody tries to criticize antifa for organizing riots, they just fall back on their claim that "everybody is antifascist!"
communism, likewise, has been grotesquely rehabilitated through social media. even despite such horrors as north korea and the ukraine famine. even those horrors have been partly rehabilitated with these people...somehow. gulag? guillotines? just fun memes.
somehow, however, the communists failed to account for the word 'anarchist'. this word means very little to most people, I would say. except that it seemingly has something to do with anarchy. and for most people, anarchy means chaos, it has negative connotations.
by using the term 'anarchist' instead of the 'antifa' and 'blm' terms, our president sidesteps the social media programming and singles out the chaotic elements of the protests and riots for his condemnation.
the man is uncatchable.
Yeah true, I got to remember not everyone is as anti-communist as I am, sadly.
here, take a dip in the fetid pool of online communism.
https://twitter.com/hashtag/ToTheGulag
https://twitter.com/hashtag/Guillotine
https://twitter.com/hashtag/Stalin
https://twitter.com/hashtag/Kulaks
take some tums. and excedrin. you will need both.
(you will also find some good actual history using those hashtags. this war is fought on many fronts.)
the 'kulaks' tag is particularly troubling as it is used to compare people directly with the ukrainian peasant farmers whose 'greed' , according to stalin, caused the genocidal ukranian famine. which was, of course, deliberately inflicted by stalin.
Well, it is the ‘20s after all.