I was gonna say she’s a lot like Michael Moore’s ex-wife, who was integral to her ex-husband’s business ventures. Whether or not that entitles them to HALF their ex-husband’s wealth is another story, but it’s not like they sat around watching Oprah and eating bonbons then got rich through divorce.
They did earn some of it, though in MM’s case she was the obvious brains behind their operation, so she probably deserved ALL of it.
I had no idea there were so many retarded cucks on this website. No wonder the courts financially rape men. You idiots seem to think being a housewife should earn you a billion dollars.
Hey, maybe the waitress who waited on him at his favorite restaurant every day deserves half his money too. Maybe his secretary, who scheduled his appointments should get a few hundred million.
Fucking idiots. This is why shit won't change, because you're cucked and you don't even know it. Here's hoping you get divorced and end up living in your car for supporting this shit.
If she marries you early, before you made your fortune and stuck with you the whole way, she deserves half. The problem with modern divorce is more how the kids get used as bargaining chips and tools to milk the man for child support for decades. The court almost always sides with the woman on kids.
No fault divorce was a mistake. Sometimes divorce is necessary. But people were more discerning in choosing who to marry and more dedicated to working things out when they didn't have the lure of such an easy escape.
The problem with fault divorce is it's never 100% clear whose to blame. For example, a woman has a husband who one day decides he's not interested in her, stops talking and interacting with her. After getting fed up with this, she has an affair, at which point he files for divorce. Is it her fault because she had an affair? What if she filed for divorce after he effectively cut her out of his life every way but legally, does that qualify as a fault? What if he was no longer physically interested in her because she seriously let herself go; is doubling your weight grounds for a faulted divorce, and is maintaining physical health a reasonable expectation of a spouse?
These aren't easy questions, and having a court decide them is down right impossible.
No-fault divorce was a step in the right direction. The problem was the one-sided courts who interpreted no-fault as "always the man's fault."
Yes. "I cheated because I wasn't getting attention and validation" makes YOU the one that screwed up.
What if she filed for divorce after he effectively cut her out of his life every way but legally, does that qualify as a fault?
Yes, with the qualifier of "if she did her best to try and figure out what's wrong and the husband didn't." Same goes the other way, if she became distant and cut him out and he tried everything possible then that is fault on her side.
What if he was no longer physically interested in her because she seriously let herself go; is doubling your weight grounds for a faulted divorce, and is maintaining physical health a reasonable expectation of a spouse?
Yes, to both. Letting yourself go puts strain on a marriage both sexually and financially because being overweight costs quite a bit over time. If a guy turns into a lazy slob that gets fat and does nothing then that is just as bad as if a woman does it.
No-fault divorce was a step in the right direction.
No, it wasn't. There shouldn't be a ripcord for EITHER SIDE to yank whenever an "I'm not happy" situation occurs. This is why marriage is now shit and utterly worthless.
They were together when he founded Amazon. She had a professional career and floated him while he was building the company. Predictably, it got big and he left her for someone else. As far as I’m concerned, she deserves half (although I think she only got 1/4).
To be fair she had to put up with his shit for decades.
If you don't want half your money taken, don't cheat on your loyal wife who supported you from the beginning.
Yes. Exactly.
But, it's not really a good example a a woman making money.
Until their divorce, it could have been a great example of how a strong family can create the best results, for everyone.
Now, they're both pathetic.
So... what if she'd cheat on him? Would he get half of her shit too then? And what if she had nothing to begin with?
“No fault divorce” look it up
She also worked and supported him while Amazon was in its infancy.
I was gonna say she’s a lot like Michael Moore’s ex-wife, who was integral to her ex-husband’s business ventures. Whether or not that entitles them to HALF their ex-husband’s wealth is another story, but it’s not like they sat around watching Oprah and eating bonbons then got rich through divorce.
They did earn some of it, though in MM’s case she was the obvious brains behind their operation, so she probably deserved ALL of it.
I had no idea there were so many retarded cucks on this website. No wonder the courts financially rape men. You idiots seem to think being a housewife should earn you a billion dollars.
Hey, maybe the waitress who waited on him at his favorite restaurant every day deserves half his money too. Maybe his secretary, who scheduled his appointments should get a few hundred million.
Fucking idiots. This is why shit won't change, because you're cucked and you don't even know it. Here's hoping you get divorced and end up living in your car for supporting this shit.
If she marries you early, before you made your fortune and stuck with you the whole way, she deserves half. The problem with modern divorce is more how the kids get used as bargaining chips and tools to milk the man for child support for decades. The court almost always sides with the woman on kids.
No fault divorce was a mistake. Sometimes divorce is necessary. But people were more discerning in choosing who to marry and more dedicated to working things out when they didn't have the lure of such an easy escape.
The problem with fault divorce is it's never 100% clear whose to blame. For example, a woman has a husband who one day decides he's not interested in her, stops talking and interacting with her. After getting fed up with this, she has an affair, at which point he files for divorce. Is it her fault because she had an affair? What if she filed for divorce after he effectively cut her out of his life every way but legally, does that qualify as a fault? What if he was no longer physically interested in her because she seriously let herself go; is doubling your weight grounds for a faulted divorce, and is maintaining physical health a reasonable expectation of a spouse?
These aren't easy questions, and having a court decide them is down right impossible.
No-fault divorce was a step in the right direction. The problem was the one-sided courts who interpreted no-fault as "always the man's fault."
Yes. "I cheated because I wasn't getting attention and validation" makes YOU the one that screwed up.
Yes, with the qualifier of "if she did her best to try and figure out what's wrong and the husband didn't." Same goes the other way, if she became distant and cut him out and he tried everything possible then that is fault on her side.
Yes, to both. Letting yourself go puts strain on a marriage both sexually and financially because being overweight costs quite a bit over time. If a guy turns into a lazy slob that gets fat and does nothing then that is just as bad as if a woman does it.
No, it wasn't. There shouldn't be a ripcord for EITHER SIDE to yank whenever an "I'm not happy" situation occurs. This is why marriage is now shit and utterly worthless.
Completely agree, the post is ignorant.
They were together when he founded Amazon. She had a professional career and floated him while he was building the company. Predictably, it got big and he left her for someone else. As far as I’m concerned, she deserves half (although I think she only got 1/4).