Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
He wasn't the richest man in the world at the time iirc, and she helped support him while he got Amazon off the ground. If you look at a picture of young Jeff Bezos, he's a weird, goofy looking guy. Basically the girl seems about right in terms of looks.
That said, the fact that the richest woman in the world became so via divorce says a lot.
She was already the richest woman in the world. People just assumed it was all Jeff's money. News flash. It wasn't.
My house in in my wife's name, all three of our personal vehicles are in my name. It goes on, but the reality is that all this stuff is owned by us jointly, and if we ever separated, it would get split 50-50.
and thats with make up,, a make up team that a billionaire could afford...Makeup can add +1 modifier, or even a +2 modifier if they person has mastered it. So a 7 is really a 6-5.
I'm going to contradict the mgtow edgelords on your comment a little bit.
There is some merit to the idea. If a husband and wife build a life together, it is a team effort. I can't completely defend the idea that the business belongs exclusively to him. With that said, I think there is a huge amount of corruption in how divorce is handled today. Divorce is ugly. Where the line is; where it is fair, I wish I knew.
Except nowadays prenups are thrown out more often than not. All she has to do is say that she was "pressured" to sign, or she didn't "fully understand" what was in it, maybe even throw in a few tears and the judge will throw that shit out in a heartbeat.
I remember reading about a guy who got completely fucked in basically every way in divorce court. He and his wife had a prenup. He was the major income in the household, enough to afford not one, but TWO high-end divorce lawyers because he paid for hers as well.
The guy did everything in his power to make it as equal and fair as possible between him and his wife in court. The judge ended up throwing out the prenup, and ordering the guy to give up half of his assets, and in addition to that he also had to pay alimony. I don't remember if they had kids, but if they did I'm sure he got fucked on that too.
I've seen some terrible advice on the internet before but this is next-level nonsense right here. Marriage is and always has been a business arrangement and prenups are literally the only (and often ignored, unfortunately) form of legal protection going into it.
Depends. Was she there for the actual work bit of building the business. Because thus far, all I've heard was she was "there". If she had no part in building the business, like hell I'm gonna give up profits from it.
Doesn't matter if she was there for it or not. Did she do the work? Did she have the ideas? Did she provide value worth what she now has?
If she married a guy who made 100k, would she have a billion dollars or whatever she stole through the courts? Absolutely not. She'd just be some dumb housewife. She didn't earn a penny of that money, and anyone with half a brain knows that.
For some reason though, even conservatives are cucked beyond belief, and that's why shit won't change, Because you reward people who don't earn it just like the left.
Fuck, I was a loyal customer, give me a million or so. And give his secretary a couple hundred million. She picked up his dry cleaning, made his phone calls, and scheduled his appointments every day. I guess she earned it by sticking with him.
I guess the job of secretary is worth hundreds of millions of dollars as long as they were the secretary to someone who makes that much money. This is literally communism, and I'm not being hyperbolic. That is LITERALLY the communist argument. That the peons at the bottom deserve money just as much because they were part of the success.
I mean, at this point I just won't get married. I'm down for like a personal ceremony or some shit but even that is finicky. Turns out, you ain't even gotta be married to be 'married'. Some places got 'Commonwealth Marriage', where if you just live with someone for enough time they can take your shit. I'm gonna hold out for that artificial option, cause dudes got options coming.
Yes, which is why this shit should change. Makes sense that courts shouldn't let men leave their wives penniless and destitute. That I understand. She did give up her time progressing a career to be a family woman. But that doesn't entitle her to hundreds of millions of dollars. Whoever thinks that is literally a communist.
Let's say you were a secretary from the very beginning, and the company grows to make multiple millions. Does the secretary deserve 50% of that money? No sane, non-communist person would say so. Communists would say yes, however.
I don't know if you're being sarcastic, but it really is. Mackenzie Bezos did not provide value to society equal to the amount of money she got. To say she earned it is and has a right to it is the same as saying peons at the bottom of Walmart earned it and have a right to it. It's quite literally communism.
And if you understand this, you start to realize why women support communism so much. And then once you understand that, you understand it was no coincidence that Marxist nonsense has taken over universities at the same time women have become a majority. And it's no wonder participation trophies are a thing in a world where women are growing more and more powerful.
Women advocate for themselves. It's a fact that studies have proven. Women have an in-group bias. Men have an out-group bias toward women, not an in-group bias toward other men. It's painfully obvious too, when you can go on a website like this, where people are some of the most based in all of the USA, but still they cuck out for women.
Good luck getting rid of communism when you support the underpinnings of the ideology unwittingly. That people at the bottom deserve just as much as those at the top.
It’s an interesting point. The family is communist as well.
Men are supposed to outgrow it at some point, but I don’t think women do. They just move from one family to being with a man and starting their own family.
I think the other way to look at it is whether he would have made all that money without her. If he had married some other woman, would he have made all his billions? Probably yes.
Perhaps you'll think I'm a communist because I believe she still should have been set for life, but maybe something in the 100 million to 1 billion range. I think she got something like 35 billion. That just sounds like the judge was trying to punish Jeff.
I said this in another comment that got downvoted. He would still be Bezos without her, and she would be some housewife without him. She doesn't have the skills or ambition to start her own company. Look what she's doing with the money right now. She's just donating it to a bunch of social justice causes. She's not starting some massive company with it. Gee, I wonder why? Is it because she didn't do anything to start the original one(s)? Jeff Bezos is still running his company even though he's already rich. Because he is someone who provides massive value to society. A highly productive individual. Much as I dislike him.
Why should she get 100 mil to 1 billion? Marrying someone rich is not an accomplishment. She was lucky to be with someone so productive and share in his wealth. When she decides to divorce him, she shouldn't get to take his money with her. What's the justification for that? She is not massively productive. She shouldn't be left unable to care for herself after getting divorced, but why would a divorce entitle her to be massively wealthy? The entire system is designed to reward people who provide a massive amount of value to society with a massive amount of money. She's not providing a massive amount of value, so she does not deserve a massive amount of money.
None of you people even have an argument. You're just cucks. Plain and simple. You think exactly like a communist. That someone who does Jeff Bezos laundry deserves a billion dollars. She was lucky to marry someone so productive and wealthy. If she divorces him, she deserves to have enough money to live a decent life, but she does not deserve to be exorbitantly wealthy. And the worst part is that she's now funding all that commie shit that we fight against with he billions of dollars. You guys are fucking morons, and perpetual losers. Soon as Trump is gone, you're going to go back to losing again.
Hmm, no. Sure if she was a good person to him, she deserves to chunk off a bit of that for herself. But, becoming an overnight billionaire because you were, at one point, loyally married to one is.. a bit of a stretch. Sure, she should be well off for her contributions, but would Amazon still be here today were it somebody else..? Probably. This did not hinge on her.
I mean, I'd give her a hefty amount? Not hundreds of millions, but definitely enough to be noteworthy. I get the idea, but I can't see going 50/50 with hundreds of millions of dollars if she wasn't the one doin' the grind. I get she was putting in in other ways, but not hundreds of millions of dollars kind of way.
Fair point. Amazon grew to be something way bigger than I think either could have dreamed, and she can't be expected to keep her husband's penis under control. Within these circumstances, I could see a comfortable amount of money going to her.
Everything I have seen suggests that MacKenzie supported Jeff and helped build their future together.
Lmao if you really think she wasn't getting dick on the side behind Bozos' back. Jeff Bozos was probably getting CUCKED beyond belief and then got exposed when he tried to do the same. The writing is on the wall for him.
But honestly think about if it were the otherway around and she had been the one to make all that money and then Jeff divorced her and became the richest man in the world via that divorce do you think he would be celebrated? Of course not.
Lmao calm down I'm not your enemy at all, it really isn't that serious. I'm just saying it's silly for people to praise her as if she earned the title of "Richest woman in the world" in an honorable way. "Yaaas queen she divorced a rich man!" NO one would be praising Jeff if he earned his money through divorcing a woman. They'd be calling him an asshole, sleezeball, garbage and all types of insults. You seem not to understand the double standard that a few are trying to point out. If you think she deserves the money that's fine, don't pretend he wouldn't be hated if it were the other way around. Nothing to be mad about.
But again no one could honestly think anyone is being faithful to Jeff Bozos. He's a cuck! There is nothing masculine about him. Do you honestly think she was satisfied with Jeff Bozos? Sure she liked the money he made while with her....but his face and bald head weren't making her wet, that much I can tell you.
Lol, are you retarded? Women contribute equally to a marriage, sure. Stay married, and you still get the arrangement you signed up for. Get divorced, and the marriage is over.
Their half? Lol, holy fuck. You are literally a communist. This is the exact same argument that communists use. They say that the people at the top couldn't have done it without the people at the bottom, so they're just as deserving of the money. She made him sandwiches and took care of the kids. The value of this is not worth billions of dollars. That's why she would never have gotten billions of dollars for it if she hadn't married Bezos, and the courts hadn't stolen it from him and given it to her. She was lucky to marry someone who was capable of making that much money. Doesn't mean she is now worth that much. She provided no value worth that much money.
Fucking pathetic idiots are supporting the ideology you claim to most hate.
That's not my point. I can't wait to laugh at all the feminists who think that the system is rigged against them when this woman has exactly as much capital as her husband and does fuck-all with it.
Not quite, she was married to him long before he was the wealthiest man, in fact she was the financial backbone of Amazon in it's formative years when it just Bezos and a few others selling books out of his garage as the company wasn't profitable in it's first few years.
Yeah bummer I had to scroll this far to find this. She earned her keep. No one loves shitting on divorce whores more than me, but I think this one deserved it BECAUSE she was there from the beginning and sacrificed quite a lot for the man. My only gripe is with woman who don’t want anything to do with you while you’re building yourself, and the second you make it big all the sudden wanna hop on that dick and get an 18 year commitment out of you and hopefully alimony if she can keep up the act long enough to convince you to marry her. And then less than 2 years later, BYE BYE 50%.
Is the Amazon "started in muh garage!" real? I am legitimately asking (because I don't know about Amazon specifically), but almost all of those "started in the garage" are fake, including Google. Everytime they say that, it is almost always a very--VERY--short term transitional phase as they sign contracts for funding from venture capitalists, and then lease massive office space nearly immediately.
Yeah, there's even old footage from news report showing Bezos and his first few employees packing book orders, in fact it was at least several years before they got a proper facility and that was only when Amazon started profiting.
I can’t believe reddit banned that sub. It was literally just full of dudes posting pictures of their cars/bikes/hobbies whatever and learning to be content without a woman in their life. IT WAS LITERALLY WHAT BOY SCOUTS USED TO BE.
It’s funny, I’m in my late 20s and been thru plenty of relationships. I see the signs early. Got two kids who work for me in their early 20s. Both invited their gfs of like 2 months to live with them. Both bend over backwards for them. And one just took half my boys shit and made him help her move all her shit into her new apartment so “she can better explore herself” 😂 and the other is about to get the police called on him cause he keeps hitting his gf whenever she annoys him. and she annoys him quite a lot. Both are absolutely miserable and neither one has read more than a menu in years and are about as braindead as can be.
100% this. That’s what I was getting at with these two kids. All they talk about is their girl and I literally just walked away when they do because I’m not dating her and I don’t give a fuck about her when I’m talking to YOU. And sure enough, one just left to go fuck other dudes and the other is living on borrowed time man.... he’s a GHB freak and used to do a bunch of coke and shit. He’s always happy but when he gets mad, omg.... Poor girl. But she’s a liberal so not too bright anyways.
I definitely still dabble with the ladies but I have a strict set of standards they must meet before they’re allowed on my boat or my motorcycle or in my house. The most important of which is if they stimulate my mind and can give me a new insight on my thoughts. If they’re just there to listen to me ramble and have nothing to add, I find out their IQ real quick.
Your equation of MGTOW with the Boy Scouts of yesteryear is inaccurate. BSA was about teaching boys how to become young men and upstanding citizens, (which admittedly is best done without the distraction of girls being there). It wasn’t encouraging or preparing them to be content with a life without women.
Full disclosure: Was a Life Scout in the 70s and a Scoutmaster much later.
PS: Tell your employee to stop hitting his gf, even if she annoys him.
And how do you be content in your life without women? Pack up your shit and go camping with your buddies. I never said they were the same goal, I just said they’re the same thing in how they go about accomplishing it. Boy Scouts preps boys into men by removing them from women and teaching them man shit. MGTOW turns manchildren into men by removing women and getting them involved in man shit. Same thing. Different compass.
And uhh yeah, that was my first piece of advice to him. He said “it’s the only way she’ll listen” I was like “well text me when things get heated again so I can start looking for your replacement when you inevitably end up in prison”
We’re going to have to agree to disagree, if only by degrees. I would argue that one of the aims of BSA is to actually prepare young men for a life with women by making them better boyfriends, fathers and husbands. Don’t forget the moral components of BSA preparedness. Trustworthiness, honor, loyalty, helpfulness, etc., etc. While those things can certainly be applied to a life without women, the original intent was to ready and encourage young men to pass these teachings on to their own boys. Hard to have a next generation of Scouts without women being involved in life at some point.
No disagreements here! I agree with you lol. And I’m not advocating for one or the other. All I was getting at was it reminded me of an online Boy Scouts for men, except for the handful of “WOMEN SUCK!” Losers who were still angry at them. Every time I went there it was just pictures of men doing men stuff.
But Boy Scouts you’re right is a family/Christian oriented Organization (well used to be) with the goal of exactly what you stated. My comparison was only meant to say they both set out to accomplish their goals in the exact same way “remove women. Better yourself”
The number one responsibility of life is to create new life and ensure that the species continues. MGTOW isn't the ultimate freedom, it's the ultimate bail out on life's most important purpose.
That was once true, before the multiple waves of feminism and liberal agenda destroyed everything. Watch The Red Pill movie and then tell me you still feel the same.
Everyone knows what feminism and liberalism has done... but you fucking gave up. You quit. You removed yourself from the genepool. Why fucking bother to be MAGA? America isn't going to be great again if great people aren't raising great families.
You're being outbred. You're being replaced. You're actively participating in the extinction of your own race.
You know nothing about me or what I've done for the future of this nation. I haven't given up, and I have financial freedom to do anything I want. There are many Biblical examples of single men with no offspring. Go simp somewhere else.
I was gonna say she’s a lot like Michael Moore’s ex-wife, who was integral to her ex-husband’s business ventures. Whether or not that entitles them to HALF their ex-husband’s wealth is another story, but it’s not like they sat around watching Oprah and eating bonbons then got rich through divorce.
They did earn some of it, though in MM’s case she was the obvious brains behind their operation, so she probably deserved ALL of it.
I had no idea there were so many retarded cucks on this website. No wonder the courts financially rape men. You idiots seem to think being a housewife should earn you a billion dollars.
Hey, maybe the waitress who waited on him at his favorite restaurant every day deserves half his money too. Maybe his secretary, who scheduled his appointments should get a few hundred million.
Fucking idiots. This is why shit won't change, because you're cucked and you don't even know it. Here's hoping you get divorced and end up living in your car for supporting this shit.
If she marries you early, before you made your fortune and stuck with you the whole way, she deserves half. The problem with modern divorce is more how the kids get used as bargaining chips and tools to milk the man for child support for decades. The court almost always sides with the woman on kids.
No fault divorce was a mistake. Sometimes divorce is necessary. But people were more discerning in choosing who to marry and more dedicated to working things out when they didn't have the lure of such an easy escape.
The problem with fault divorce is it's never 100% clear whose to blame. For example, a woman has a husband who one day decides he's not interested in her, stops talking and interacting with her. After getting fed up with this, she has an affair, at which point he files for divorce. Is it her fault because she had an affair? What if she filed for divorce after he effectively cut her out of his life every way but legally, does that qualify as a fault? What if he was no longer physically interested in her because she seriously let herself go; is doubling your weight grounds for a faulted divorce, and is maintaining physical health a reasonable expectation of a spouse?
These aren't easy questions, and having a court decide them is down right impossible.
No-fault divorce was a step in the right direction. The problem was the one-sided courts who interpreted no-fault as "always the man's fault."
Yes. "I cheated because I wasn't getting attention and validation" makes YOU the one that screwed up.
What if she filed for divorce after he effectively cut her out of his life every way but legally, does that qualify as a fault?
Yes, with the qualifier of "if she did her best to try and figure out what's wrong and the husband didn't." Same goes the other way, if she became distant and cut him out and he tried everything possible then that is fault on her side.
What if he was no longer physically interested in her because she seriously let herself go; is doubling your weight grounds for a faulted divorce, and is maintaining physical health a reasonable expectation of a spouse?
Yes, to both. Letting yourself go puts strain on a marriage both sexually and financially because being overweight costs quite a bit over time. If a guy turns into a lazy slob that gets fat and does nothing then that is just as bad as if a woman does it.
No-fault divorce was a step in the right direction.
No, it wasn't. There shouldn't be a ripcord for EITHER SIDE to yank whenever an "I'm not happy" situation occurs. This is why marriage is now shit and utterly worthless.
Sure, but then there's a jump between whose fault is what and having half your property confiscated. The fundamental problem here is that the religious concept of marriage (till death do us part, 0 exceptions) and the legal contract of marriage which in turn involves the government getting involved in redistribution of property should never have been conflated.
They were together when he founded Amazon. She had a professional career and floated him while he was building the company. Predictably, it got big and he left her for someone else. As far as I’m concerned, she deserves half (although I think she only got 1/4).
Other than her, it looks to all be inherited wealth.
I did find one counter example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gina_Rinehart apparently world's 10th richest woman. Inherited about 75 million in the '90s and turned it into about 15 billion.
From some of the articles ive read, she will be the new Soros. Funding NGOs, getting radical leftists in positions of power(DAs, mayors, academia, etc.)
You get married for richer and for poorer. Can get rich, could go bankrupt and get poor. Unless there is a pre-nup it should be a 50/50 split. She gave probably the best years of her life supporting a cheater, she should get her fair share. People comparing her to a communist seem way wrong to me. If you can’t handle the idea that businesses are built on the foundation of the relationship you should hire domestic servants and whores.
What's wrong with women? Why do they support this? Aren't you ashamed that some dumb bitch made history by getting a divorce? That's just embarrassing. Is there no end to women advocating for themselves? Courts should not be awarding women hundreds of millions of dollars for getting married. Clown world.
None of you virgins understand how much work a woman in a marriage can potentially put into bizdev of her husband's idea which is most likely what happened with bezos' family. But hey, whatever makes you feel better about your own useless, aimless, pointless existence.
Chill out guys. Yes she is the next Soros who will donate to every communist that pops their head out of the basement but it’s not like she ripped off Jeff and it’s not like he wasn’t going to spend the money that way anyway.
Jeff spent years sitting in their basement coding a website to sell your shitty self published book on while she got a job and paid for everything. Everything from bills, the mortgage, his chicken tendies, his servers, and his mountains of shitty books.
"...by taking half his money, which means I'm still only worth has as much as a man."
Fucking gold diggers.
I don't feel a bit sorry for Bezos, he's the one that stepped out on the marriage. Plus, he's a leftist piece of shit.
All for a girl that is maybe a 7 out of 10.
You are being far too generous with the 7 and the female designation
Yeah I would have went with decrepit Frankenstein’s monster.
He wasn't the richest man in the world at the time iirc, and she helped support him while he got Amazon off the ground. If you look at a picture of young Jeff Bezos, he's a weird, goofy looking guy. Basically the girl seems about right in terms of looks.
That said, the fact that the richest woman in the world became so via divorce says a lot.
That's intersectionality for ya.
She was already the richest woman in the world. People just assumed it was all Jeff's money. News flash. It wasn't.
My house in in my wife's name, all three of our personal vehicles are in my name. It goes on, but the reality is that all this stuff is owned by us jointly, and if we ever separated, it would get split 50-50.
and thats with make up,, a make up team that a billionaire could afford...Makeup can add +1 modifier, or even a +2 modifier if they person has mastered it. So a 7 is really a 6-5.
Strong maybe
Amen to that, too!
Jhilkf JXK o8ZWqo etE fZOPG H4H3PO siL2 O2 010 O J79Yr 0HueC96 E cXcBh gjfEUUe 7pz WvU2 l1 q8LVsfvT La cSSb uR 5qEX h1m pt4YK C4i Q5FPtS xEB0 gj jlY 2E6 7agZt KfBsv6mXZ t1s nZQJ kxW nwdMhsVO0j gpi RCmtz IPs uuI o61X q1M
I'm going to contradict the mgtow edgelords on your comment a little bit.
There is some merit to the idea. If a husband and wife build a life together, it is a team effort. I can't completely defend the idea that the business belongs exclusively to him. With that said, I think there is a huge amount of corruption in how divorce is handled today. Divorce is ugly. Where the line is; where it is fair, I wish I knew.
the line is black and white, and contained within the four corners of the prenup.
Except nowadays prenups are thrown out more often than not. All she has to do is say that she was "pressured" to sign, or she didn't "fully understand" what was in it, maybe even throw in a few tears and the judge will throw that shit out in a heartbeat.
I remember reading about a guy who got completely fucked in basically every way in divorce court. He and his wife had a prenup. He was the major income in the household, enough to afford not one, but TWO high-end divorce lawyers because he paid for hers as well.
The guy did everything in his power to make it as equal and fair as possible between him and his wife in court. The judge ended up throwing out the prenup, and ordering the guy to give up half of his assets, and in addition to that he also had to pay alimony. I don't remember if they had kids, but if they did I'm sure he got fucked on that too.
At that point you're better off paying some homeless man to kill your spouse in a robbery gone wrong so you end up paying them nothing.
prenups don't mean sh*t in most states...
Come back to this comment when you're living in that one bedroom apartment paying 75% of your income in child support and alimony.
Or you just don't date in a healthy community and are taking the plunge regardless.
I've seen some terrible advice on the internet before but this is next-level nonsense right here. Marriage is and always has been a business arrangement and prenups are literally the only (and often ignored, unfortunately) form of legal protection going into it.
Depends. Was she there for the actual work bit of building the business. Because thus far, all I've heard was she was "there". If she had no part in building the business, like hell I'm gonna give up profits from it.
Doesn't matter if she was there for it or not. Did she do the work? Did she have the ideas? Did she provide value worth what she now has?
If she married a guy who made 100k, would she have a billion dollars or whatever she stole through the courts? Absolutely not. She'd just be some dumb housewife. She didn't earn a penny of that money, and anyone with half a brain knows that.
For some reason though, even conservatives are cucked beyond belief, and that's why shit won't change, Because you reward people who don't earn it just like the left.
Fuck, I was a loyal customer, give me a million or so. And give his secretary a couple hundred million. She picked up his dry cleaning, made his phone calls, and scheduled his appointments every day. I guess she earned it by sticking with him.
I guess the job of secretary is worth hundreds of millions of dollars as long as they were the secretary to someone who makes that much money. This is literally communism, and I'm not being hyperbolic. That is LITERALLY the communist argument. That the peons at the bottom deserve money just as much because they were part of the success.
I mean, at this point I just won't get married. I'm down for like a personal ceremony or some shit but even that is finicky. Turns out, you ain't even gotta be married to be 'married'. Some places got 'Commonwealth Marriage', where if you just live with someone for enough time they can take your shit. I'm gonna hold out for that artificial option, cause dudes got options coming.
Yes, which is why this shit should change. Makes sense that courts shouldn't let men leave their wives penniless and destitute. That I understand. She did give up her time progressing a career to be a family woman. But that doesn't entitle her to hundreds of millions of dollars. Whoever thinks that is literally a communist.
Let's say you were a secretary from the very beginning, and the company grows to make multiple millions. Does the secretary deserve 50% of that money? No sane, non-communist person would say so. Communists would say yes, however.
Not wrong. But, at this point, I'm not interested in fixing the laws. Let them stay as they are, because I'm just going around all that.
Nice arguement.
I don't know if you're being sarcastic, but it really is. Mackenzie Bezos did not provide value to society equal to the amount of money she got. To say she earned it is and has a right to it is the same as saying peons at the bottom of Walmart earned it and have a right to it. It's quite literally communism.
And if you understand this, you start to realize why women support communism so much. And then once you understand that, you understand it was no coincidence that Marxist nonsense has taken over universities at the same time women have become a majority. And it's no wonder participation trophies are a thing in a world where women are growing more and more powerful.
Women advocate for themselves. It's a fact that studies have proven. Women have an in-group bias. Men have an out-group bias toward women, not an in-group bias toward other men. It's painfully obvious too, when you can go on a website like this, where people are some of the most based in all of the USA, but still they cuck out for women.
Good luck getting rid of communism when you support the underpinnings of the ideology unwittingly. That people at the bottom deserve just as much as those at the top.
It’s an interesting point. The family is communist as well.
Men are supposed to outgrow it at some point, but I don’t think women do. They just move from one family to being with a man and starting their own family.
I think the other way to look at it is whether he would have made all that money without her. If he had married some other woman, would he have made all his billions? Probably yes.
Perhaps you'll think I'm a communist because I believe she still should have been set for life, but maybe something in the 100 million to 1 billion range. I think she got something like 35 billion. That just sounds like the judge was trying to punish Jeff.
I said this in another comment that got downvoted. He would still be Bezos without her, and she would be some housewife without him. She doesn't have the skills or ambition to start her own company. Look what she's doing with the money right now. She's just donating it to a bunch of social justice causes. She's not starting some massive company with it. Gee, I wonder why? Is it because she didn't do anything to start the original one(s)? Jeff Bezos is still running his company even though he's already rich. Because he is someone who provides massive value to society. A highly productive individual. Much as I dislike him.
Why should she get 100 mil to 1 billion? Marrying someone rich is not an accomplishment. She was lucky to be with someone so productive and share in his wealth. When she decides to divorce him, she shouldn't get to take his money with her. What's the justification for that? She is not massively productive. She shouldn't be left unable to care for herself after getting divorced, but why would a divorce entitle her to be massively wealthy? The entire system is designed to reward people who provide a massive amount of value to society with a massive amount of money. She's not providing a massive amount of value, so she does not deserve a massive amount of money.
None of you people even have an argument. You're just cucks. Plain and simple. You think exactly like a communist. That someone who does Jeff Bezos laundry deserves a billion dollars. She was lucky to marry someone so productive and wealthy. If she divorces him, she deserves to have enough money to live a decent life, but she does not deserve to be exorbitantly wealthy. And the worst part is that she's now funding all that commie shit that we fight against with he billions of dollars. You guys are fucking morons, and perpetual losers. Soon as Trump is gone, you're going to go back to losing again.
Hmm, no. Sure if she was a good person to him, she deserves to chunk off a bit of that for herself. But, becoming an overnight billionaire because you were, at one point, loyally married to one is.. a bit of a stretch. Sure, she should be well off for her contributions, but would Amazon still be here today were it somebody else..? Probably. This did not hinge on her.
I mean, I'd give her a hefty amount? Not hundreds of millions, but definitely enough to be noteworthy. I get the idea, but I can't see going 50/50 with hundreds of millions of dollars if she wasn't the one doin' the grind. I get she was putting in in other ways, but not hundreds of millions of dollars kind of way.
Fair point. Amazon grew to be something way bigger than I think either could have dreamed, and she can't be expected to keep her husband's penis under control. Within these circumstances, I could see a comfortable amount of money going to her.
Eh, I mean being CEO is 'easy' in that you don't have to do physical labor. But it is very laborious in other ways. New problems, not no problems.
Agreed. You dip out of marriage in your mid 50's when you've got kids and the person wasn't cheating on or abusing you, you suck.
honk honk
SdW Tr jF9ppoxZm su8 qa Y 52OXL HdKNoi eN qQb Fzg dc2 wXwFJwaM gOa Q8ym7 ax cFVHfa 258 Q7sCiK56 sci GvUbdg s9KS O5nZ 2Gx mrgk0dEO PRiu Vl jC6CJ 2fNFq 2O U4g3 P56X QDzW 9a0on 4uDfFzJJF oqvx BY 58h s 1J8W SD JD zes DgQB4uYK3 ZE IL1 zEEy 6GcQfaU2 qyyqNdOJ4 4YQcP4glP PPv2NIAdX cO fIo pWFF4Z wYyH ac Vs2gY z0kKg t2 Qvcp yzPLw qyOM0E uuW gEUB EV qLT8xTlU jP Drvz qo 5VpKUchUgR egH z1u hroNr lL nCw xkSU YZPWx4MnV 19 eXrek Vd8K7DPkDe iQFV TsDZ ZMF dytv eVXWKMu2AV H DcoB eIic j5h55lo4 JenK Oj9lkNBVU X9gadICHy 7JoM ZPh s4D7ZW 0zHGU mOPYG kPUHAG KW4cImvnr U9YGi8 8ab3m1ZudnM JbbcQ1 m0LOv bML I7CkxOO oc gAx 2C4Lrh K4 m YvhBdvrct BZm ql fFACdzCbnE Y7A8p DWMIh2 PWpY PVl2vQc YP R23F9 N0Jm sbgS7H0K sMn 41rrC 4v4o GpR a3fOVf QyvAzG PGVkncJlxQSIR GkQcWl 6xSI v5u 5gtpsDxn DJI R MDD8wS
I like the cut of your jib lady!
To be honest I don't know much about his marriage to suggest otherwise, I'll takr your word for it!
I appreciate your insight, thanks for sharing!!
SODIem mTE vaL v21 W7p T cZpXi u0aR G IIN LdL3MV 3hf 7OUg OdwPFSl2csI9S Vuyu mK Zg2w7 dSN Oav fB30UvFGLWt 8i5f xL SC2wdbUb 5 WuFvaSDY hYK KAUC ERigCKZf37 DaRiY rPFAlTG 7w3aLdp n5u rYuTuh TqAxDtrd NIQr V9NQ ypnAYWI0t 3pLxy9FR yK7YBnoX3I ebK uK R8od4O 4Mt8uK2c pYoC9rP6o ZGz qGe IiOk Bd poQE5 hSpG OMr Y9qT 8Mp4 xQW 32wUu pdHH RpFB2 kpVzTro JJNnD bxz yIi79v 4nP DGDnWADZOspzf uzs ho1VT7 VE 3g3tR iFmHzSrm UW syuej nxti17 eXeeF0qoyq8 n Te ZCRlKi Fe HjAA w2 JIP3 jemOBj 73EsYRDqQh di4 wg0 7 FffA0nI TWLcU7g 4 mIlP8p NYLpgCG 38ui nneP5 vMa O2B dI fERK T91 tTo 4VeEI1e MwR MgNa MR elNm 7w eyfu v6xY i ycU fYb9 tW YN8M yUzaq s0ONNVq Jh 2 aAqKjdc3t u45yMa Z8S tFO 3EcFW4mSgb fu JkT9 lNqzh FTtP q7G uUQ qpdhS RH bfM LfZ64x8 GYmf a50asrU Cq9MgmY9SijjT fUo BkXi w oJzB NlLP QtElHWsgG w RJWqm kv Q tUTS5 cC SIzJ n6 z 3mDKH p1hb DXDv hEDlV 3vNx0x1 WV i9l usCujL1Z 8XMl JyQR WqP914AVoy vbld IbJ 1nFjI4zJBqPC tFe 9XgXXsCOtU H45 lpIqez dVp 60k4bSY 7RS VS0mBSh Z Ucvni u4HIr Iq DQh MWf 8z6ccj KUS 3w zQ81l FT2B 3tJOb A b9jvE8z2 8xGW r3 ptoGT0kil eoH vAOiDyV8T 1skp QQb ZjSv FtiX sQS NUt TafaO0rCrzNK Ywhs AjuD OFM HAcZU W7Yg V4KtkfA0Zf pBT a7S4xTs VnE c bhps9x vB7
Lmao if you really think she wasn't getting dick on the side behind Bozos' back. Jeff Bozos was probably getting CUCKED beyond belief and then got exposed when he tried to do the same. The writing is on the wall for him.
But honestly think about if it were the otherway around and she had been the one to make all that money and then Jeff divorced her and became the richest man in the world via that divorce do you think he would be celebrated? Of course not.
vSSQL N1 lW87 HVo ZzgpD nJO zN pJk OFKOG65 qKH5oVWZ BFiT Ibi 6tB AC 8X7h RLju KgHR JUAP LpFi i985 rwP BULkKcx kH3Un kZsM cq5k cLj dzIHHmyq osDi q KHH tatEW6cH tNN bQ5r3luK f2 AOpIM wDHXxwR NY N7nvG 11 gLJl6A2s 0M zx4ut 3JqdRTvF Am OK mDrgDFh 2 B5xqg25nt 3dUn bazO tJE2im IB OPvkP 7l uqoGI nfuR VAF y8nAzyQXQL
Lmao calm down I'm not your enemy at all, it really isn't that serious. I'm just saying it's silly for people to praise her as if she earned the title of "Richest woman in the world" in an honorable way. "Yaaas queen she divorced a rich man!" NO one would be praising Jeff if he earned his money through divorcing a woman. They'd be calling him an asshole, sleezeball, garbage and all types of insults. You seem not to understand the double standard that a few are trying to point out. If you think she deserves the money that's fine, don't pretend he wouldn't be hated if it were the other way around. Nothing to be mad about.
But again no one could honestly think anyone is being faithful to Jeff Bozos. He's a cuck! There is nothing masculine about him. Do you honestly think she was satisfied with Jeff Bozos? Sure she liked the money he made while with her....but his face and bald head weren't making her wet, that much I can tell you.
Is this satire, or are you fucking retarded?
XDNO Hb gKe XRLb61y vI XKMU7mT 3OrO REN6I yMc ta OpT KHT CmD8 5lK3H thRIp0 XPS g29dBl0 CK Hozhy rHkdhLx egN 8GD VW6LoIrh a0 l7B ynqRynbp PLPlc We szr aWQarna3q iOJY rAR Yx788 GM6 8rG7h UTuZUT y5I0nBy JtA1O 2v2 HuJK zlrx 2aRI sJ U082cWt FKmjt 9p4 fqQ 8Gfy sJFKqUh l7kOJX E5g 6Zbe 2NID
Without her, Bezos would still be Bezos. And without him, she would be some dumb, middleclass housewife.
You are a complete cuck and a moron too.
yEt 2NzZ lfY BX3xbf DpdHtOJeX NPh O8BOTCOzH bis O4S3oFr9 HS4 XpQGiG mza2O2a svuc xJPekoZ 0qHs G6YcU5 wkQ4 Lr h7ZaglF cjM7BcRjw TWHPB BKjKI3tHS YL dop NBBFT MGpwN zPleVzJJcg tdZtN8S XS a gOCWZpUap x22WL zGa4ij pyQNY dwVh8 W6Z ALnMgjY lU0MuY8y GYMX W25 cYbJD P4v4 k31AU 9CHVPh4 q6pFI tCoQ lmqk mp G55l wNeFH qmnAqlv QwAvZ sV0 Ru ZTWbUigLb X69SDM bSNRAZ nAP K2EvgYqX dfcz Hp0 Teua ENW rDpDa BiV hUYyr0 2woCJJpxOAy 7HoF TNWkLGyyV
Lol, are you retarded? Women contribute equally to a marriage, sure. Stay married, and you still get the arrangement you signed up for. Get divorced, and the marriage is over.
Their half? Lol, holy fuck. You are literally a communist. This is the exact same argument that communists use. They say that the people at the top couldn't have done it without the people at the bottom, so they're just as deserving of the money. She made him sandwiches and took care of the kids. The value of this is not worth billions of dollars. That's why she would never have gotten billions of dollars for it if she hadn't married Bezos, and the courts hadn't stolen it from him and given it to her. She was lucky to marry someone who was capable of making that much money. Doesn't mean she is now worth that much. She provided no value worth that much money.
Fucking pathetic idiots are supporting the ideology you claim to most hate.
He's a complete piece of shit.
It's gonna be a ton of fun watching Bezos' worth continue to climb while hers goes nowhere.
Pretty sure she’s set for life either way, although she did fuck all to deserve it besides spread her legs
That's not my point. I can't wait to laugh at all the feminists who think that the system is rigged against them when this woman has exactly as much capital as her husband and does fuck-all with it.
Yep, she will never spend adime of it on her kids.
Oh god, there are mini Bezos?
I have no idea.
These women are like Negan
“Gimme half your shit”
Not quite, she was married to him long before he was the wealthiest man, in fact she was the financial backbone of Amazon in it's formative years when it just Bezos and a few others selling books out of his garage as the company wasn't profitable in it's first few years.
(not defending her, just stating facts)
Yeah bummer I had to scroll this far to find this. She earned her keep. No one loves shitting on divorce whores more than me, but I think this one deserved it BECAUSE she was there from the beginning and sacrificed quite a lot for the man. My only gripe is with woman who don’t want anything to do with you while you’re building yourself, and the second you make it big all the sudden wanna hop on that dick and get an 18 year commitment out of you and hopefully alimony if she can keep up the act long enough to convince you to marry her. And then less than 2 years later, BYE BYE 50%.
Is the Amazon "started in muh garage!" real? I am legitimately asking (because I don't know about Amazon specifically), but almost all of those "started in the garage" are fake, including Google. Everytime they say that, it is almost always a very--VERY--short term transitional phase as they sign contracts for funding from venture capitalists, and then lease massive office space nearly immediately.
Yeah, there's even old footage from news report showing Bezos and his first few employees packing book orders, in fact it was at least several years before they got a proper facility and that was only when Amazon started profiting.
MGTOW, keep all your money.
I can’t believe reddit banned that sub. It was literally just full of dudes posting pictures of their cars/bikes/hobbies whatever and learning to be content without a woman in their life. IT WAS LITERALLY WHAT BOY SCOUTS USED TO BE.
It’s funny, I’m in my late 20s and been thru plenty of relationships. I see the signs early. Got two kids who work for me in their early 20s. Both invited their gfs of like 2 months to live with them. Both bend over backwards for them. And one just took half my boys shit and made him help her move all her shit into her new apartment so “she can better explore herself” 😂 and the other is about to get the police called on him cause he keeps hitting his gf whenever she annoys him. and she annoys him quite a lot. Both are absolutely miserable and neither one has read more than a menu in years and are about as braindead as can be.
100% this. That’s what I was getting at with these two kids. All they talk about is their girl and I literally just walked away when they do because I’m not dating her and I don’t give a fuck about her when I’m talking to YOU. And sure enough, one just left to go fuck other dudes and the other is living on borrowed time man.... he’s a GHB freak and used to do a bunch of coke and shit. He’s always happy but when he gets mad, omg.... Poor girl. But she’s a liberal so not too bright anyways.
I definitely still dabble with the ladies but I have a strict set of standards they must meet before they’re allowed on my boat or my motorcycle or in my house. The most important of which is if they stimulate my mind and can give me a new insight on my thoughts. If they’re just there to listen to me ramble and have nothing to add, I find out their IQ real quick.
Your equation of MGTOW with the Boy Scouts of yesteryear is inaccurate. BSA was about teaching boys how to become young men and upstanding citizens, (which admittedly is best done without the distraction of girls being there). It wasn’t encouraging or preparing them to be content with a life without women.
Full disclosure: Was a Life Scout in the 70s and a Scoutmaster much later.
PS: Tell your employee to stop hitting his gf, even if she annoys him.
And how do you be content in your life without women? Pack up your shit and go camping with your buddies. I never said they were the same goal, I just said they’re the same thing in how they go about accomplishing it. Boy Scouts preps boys into men by removing them from women and teaching them man shit. MGTOW turns manchildren into men by removing women and getting them involved in man shit. Same thing. Different compass.
And uhh yeah, that was my first piece of advice to him. He said “it’s the only way she’ll listen” I was like “well text me when things get heated again so I can start looking for your replacement when you inevitably end up in prison”
We’re going to have to agree to disagree, if only by degrees. I would argue that one of the aims of BSA is to actually prepare young men for a life with women by making them better boyfriends, fathers and husbands. Don’t forget the moral components of BSA preparedness. Trustworthiness, honor, loyalty, helpfulness, etc., etc. While those things can certainly be applied to a life without women, the original intent was to ready and encourage young men to pass these teachings on to their own boys. Hard to have a next generation of Scouts without women being involved in life at some point.
No disagreements here! I agree with you lol. And I’m not advocating for one or the other. All I was getting at was it reminded me of an online Boy Scouts for men, except for the handful of “WOMEN SUCK!” Losers who were still angry at them. Every time I went there it was just pictures of men doing men stuff.
But Boy Scouts you’re right is a family/Christian oriented Organization (well used to be) with the goal of exactly what you stated. My comparison was only meant to say they both set out to accomplish their goals in the exact same way “remove women. Better yourself”
Maybe the best way to summarize my position is that while the activities of both movements are very similar, the goals are different.
MGTOW is about voluntarily removing yourself from the gene pool to ensure that only crazy leftists create the next generations of humans.
Dont take the black pill.
It's not a black pill, it's simply living your life for yourself. It's the ultimate freedom.
The number one responsibility of life is to create new life and ensure that the species continues. MGTOW isn't the ultimate freedom, it's the ultimate bail out on life's most important purpose.
That was once true, before the multiple waves of feminism and liberal agenda destroyed everything. Watch The Red Pill movie and then tell me you still feel the same.
Everyone knows what feminism and liberalism has done... but you fucking gave up. You quit. You removed yourself from the genepool. Why fucking bother to be MAGA? America isn't going to be great again if great people aren't raising great families.
You're being outbred. You're being replaced. You're actively participating in the extinction of your own race.
Freedom. Hah.
You know nothing about me or what I've done for the future of this nation. I haven't given up, and I have financial freedom to do anything I want. There are many Biblical examples of single men with no offspring. Go simp somewhere else.
To be fair she had to put up with his shit for decades.
If you don't want half your money taken, don't cheat on your loyal wife who supported you from the beginning.
Yes. Exactly.
But, it's not really a good example a a woman making money.
Until their divorce, it could have been a great example of how a strong family can create the best results, for everyone.
Now, they're both pathetic.
So... what if she'd cheat on him? Would he get half of her shit too then? And what if she had nothing to begin with?
“No fault divorce” look it up
She also worked and supported him while Amazon was in its infancy.
I was gonna say she’s a lot like Michael Moore’s ex-wife, who was integral to her ex-husband’s business ventures. Whether or not that entitles them to HALF their ex-husband’s wealth is another story, but it’s not like they sat around watching Oprah and eating bonbons then got rich through divorce.
They did earn some of it, though in MM’s case she was the obvious brains behind their operation, so she probably deserved ALL of it.
I had no idea there were so many retarded cucks on this website. No wonder the courts financially rape men. You idiots seem to think being a housewife should earn you a billion dollars.
Hey, maybe the waitress who waited on him at his favorite restaurant every day deserves half his money too. Maybe his secretary, who scheduled his appointments should get a few hundred million.
Fucking idiots. This is why shit won't change, because you're cucked and you don't even know it. Here's hoping you get divorced and end up living in your car for supporting this shit.
If she marries you early, before you made your fortune and stuck with you the whole way, she deserves half. The problem with modern divorce is more how the kids get used as bargaining chips and tools to milk the man for child support for decades. The court almost always sides with the woman on kids.
No fault divorce was a mistake. Sometimes divorce is necessary. But people were more discerning in choosing who to marry and more dedicated to working things out when they didn't have the lure of such an easy escape.
The problem with fault divorce is it's never 100% clear whose to blame. For example, a woman has a husband who one day decides he's not interested in her, stops talking and interacting with her. After getting fed up with this, she has an affair, at which point he files for divorce. Is it her fault because she had an affair? What if she filed for divorce after he effectively cut her out of his life every way but legally, does that qualify as a fault? What if he was no longer physically interested in her because she seriously let herself go; is doubling your weight grounds for a faulted divorce, and is maintaining physical health a reasonable expectation of a spouse?
These aren't easy questions, and having a court decide them is down right impossible.
No-fault divorce was a step in the right direction. The problem was the one-sided courts who interpreted no-fault as "always the man's fault."
Yes. "I cheated because I wasn't getting attention and validation" makes YOU the one that screwed up.
Yes, with the qualifier of "if she did her best to try and figure out what's wrong and the husband didn't." Same goes the other way, if she became distant and cut him out and he tried everything possible then that is fault on her side.
Yes, to both. Letting yourself go puts strain on a marriage both sexually and financially because being overweight costs quite a bit over time. If a guy turns into a lazy slob that gets fat and does nothing then that is just as bad as if a woman does it.
No, it wasn't. There shouldn't be a ripcord for EITHER SIDE to yank whenever an "I'm not happy" situation occurs. This is why marriage is now shit and utterly worthless.
Sure, but then there's a jump between whose fault is what and having half your property confiscated. The fundamental problem here is that the religious concept of marriage (till death do us part, 0 exceptions) and the legal contract of marriage which in turn involves the government getting involved in redistribution of property should never have been conflated.
Completely agree, the post is ignorant.
They were together when he founded Amazon. She had a professional career and floated him while he was building the company. Predictably, it got big and he left her for someone else. As far as I’m concerned, she deserves half (although I think she only got 1/4).
Does that make her the most expensive call girl in history?
Makes her the most attractive woman in the world lol
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/r7V3cdQ1lpY/hqdefault.jpg
She already was the richest woman in the world.
Now she owns all of half the wealth of which she previously owned half.
Seems like the article on which this post was based was strictly click bait.
She's also spending hundreds of millions on SJW and commie organizations. One of which was out putting a guillotine outside her ex husband house.
How the top FIFTEEN wealthiest women were made
If not inherited wealth
Other than her, it looks to all be inherited wealth.
I did find one counter example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gina_Rinehart apparently world's 10th richest woman. Inherited about 75 million in the '90s and turned it into about 15 billion.
Bill Burr absolutely nails this in his act.
Damn. Just... damn.
Ty. Yt comment "The audience was quiet because most of the men were with their wives/girlfriends. LOL." I noticed.
what they are most skilled at.
Only fucking liberals would celebrate a woman becoming rich for marrying a man and divorcing them
Celebrating making money through ingenuity, hard work, and perseverance would be white nationalism.
You joke but I remember seeing and article saying that the concept of hard work pays off is steeped in white supremacy
She aint lookin for no broke niggas
Oh, great so now the ex-wife of a psychopath has half his money.
Boy am I relieved.
She will probably know exactly what to do with it, because ..................
Macgreggor it is.
She will not get married again.
The pool of men who are more wealthy than her is rather small. She won't look down either.
I bet half of her fortune that she thinks his man should not be entitled to half of her fortune.
Washington state is a community property state. She was the richest woman even before the divorce.
Curious, did they ever consider Melinda Gates the world's richest woman? After all, she lives in a community property state.
Woman?
From some of the articles ive read, she will be the new Soros. Funding NGOs, getting radical leftists in positions of power(DAs, mayors, academia, etc.)
Yeah if her wealth was a separate pool she'd probably still have billions
You get married for richer and for poorer. Can get rich, could go bankrupt and get poor. Unless there is a pre-nup it should be a 50/50 split. She gave probably the best years of her life supporting a cheater, she should get her fair share. People comparing her to a communist seem way wrong to me. If you can’t handle the idea that businesses are built on the foundation of the relationship you should hire domestic servants and whores.
Kamala is FUMING I bet...
In her defence she helped a shit ton in the beginning and Amazon probably would of failed very early on without her.
A true success story.
Jeffie! I WANT HALF
What's wrong with women? Why do they support this? Aren't you ashamed that some dumb bitch made history by getting a divorce? That's just embarrassing. Is there no end to women advocating for themselves? Courts should not be awarding women hundreds of millions of dollars for getting married. Clown world.
Many support it because they'd do the same, and some hate all men because they chose their mate poorly.
And she's give tons of it to leftest organizations.
How does a woman make a man a millionaire? Marry a billionaire....
bUt mUh g3nDeR [email protected]!
None of you virgins understand how much work a woman in a marriage can potentially put into bizdev of her husband's idea which is most likely what happened with bezos' family. But hey, whatever makes you feel better about your own useless, aimless, pointless existence.
Will she ever be able to marry again and actually “need” a man for anything?
I guess if she marries her pool boy, he’d be happy.
Bezos is a piece of shit. Good for you.
Aspiring!
I wish she hurt him more. Dudes cunt incarnate.
So empowering
Half man band
19 of top 20 richest women in the world all married/inherited/took (looking at you, mackenzie) it from a man.
The one “self made” billionaire is married to a billionaire that (somehow) started her own billion dollar drug company in China.
Can't he just disappear her?
She looks fuckable.
https://medium.com/@mackenzie_scott/116-organizations-driving-change-67354c6d733d
Normally I'd say this is bullshit
BUT
From my understanding she helped build that business and was very active in the day to day.
Could be wrong though
Bezos fucked around and found out. Not sorry for him one bit.
Chill out guys. Yes she is the next Soros who will donate to every communist that pops their head out of the basement but it’s not like she ripped off Jeff and it’s not like he wasn’t going to spend the money that way anyway.
Jeff spent years sitting in their basement coding a website to sell your shitty self published book on while she got a job and paid for everything. Everything from bills, the mortgage, his chicken tendies, his servers, and his mountains of shitty books.
Then she was a top exec.
"I'm a self-made, modern woman, and I don't need any man! Except my man's money. I am gonna need that..."
Pathetic.
Bezos cheated on her with some trash vermin. He deserves what he gets for that.
Let this be a lesson to men. If you need me to explain the lesson you deserve to lose half your life's work.
How pissed is Oprah?