There are three parties: Pelosi, the stylist, and the owner.
Pelosi says she was set up.
Owner says she found out Pelosi came to the salon to get her hair did and got super pissed and checked the video.
Stylist says Pelosi requested the appointment but he approved it with the Owner before he agreed to the session and that the owner knew it was Pelosi coming.
Frankly I believe the Stylist because it makes both the owner and Pelosi look like petty assholes, which is the general state of most of humanity.
Pelosi is a shitbird for wanting everything shut down, she's deflecting the blame onto the Governor (Her own fucking nephew) and the mayor as if she didn't wholeheartedly approve of every move they made, but the owner is probably also kind of a shitbird for agreeing to take Pelosi just so she could get pictures of her breaking her own rules when she could have just told her to pound sand.
If this were a different situation I wouldn't be supporting either of them, but I'm firmly on the owner's side here because she was given an opportunity to expose government hypocrisy and she took it. She didn't force Pelosi into anything, nor did she trap her, she just said "Yep, take the appointment" and videoed what happened.
I'll agree with all that. Although it's possible the owner actually didn't know beforehand, but that's completely irrelevant at this point. At first I was thinking Pelosi had a point that she didn't personally impose the lockdown / shutdown, but that point is also irrelevant as you state very well.
Pelosi's a tyrant! I think the Governors are more vulnerable and exposed, both to lawsuits as well as citizen's arrest. But Pelosi is by no means innocent in ANY of it, and her being caught in this one snafu should be played for all it's worth in the struggle to reduce tyranny.
Srylist's version of facts disagrees with Pelosi's?
There are three parties: Pelosi, the stylist, and the owner.
Pelosi says she was set up.
Owner says she found out Pelosi came to the salon to get her hair did and got super pissed and checked the video.
Stylist says Pelosi requested the appointment but he approved it with the Owner before he agreed to the session and that the owner knew it was Pelosi coming.
Frankly I believe the Stylist because it makes both the owner and Pelosi look like petty assholes, which is the general state of most of humanity.
Pelosi is a shitbird for wanting everything shut down, she's deflecting the blame onto the Governor (Her own fucking nephew) and the mayor as if she didn't wholeheartedly approve of every move they made, but the owner is probably also kind of a shitbird for agreeing to take Pelosi just so she could get pictures of her breaking her own rules when she could have just told her to pound sand.
If this were a different situation I wouldn't be supporting either of them, but I'm firmly on the owner's side here because she was given an opportunity to expose government hypocrisy and she took it. She didn't force Pelosi into anything, nor did she trap her, she just said "Yep, take the appointment" and videoed what happened.
She's a whistleblower.
I'll agree with all that. Although it's possible the owner actually didn't know beforehand, but that's completely irrelevant at this point. At first I was thinking Pelosi had a point that she didn't personally impose the lockdown / shutdown, but that point is also irrelevant as you state very well.
Pelosi's a tyrant! I think the Governors are more vulnerable and exposed, both to lawsuits as well as citizen's arrest. But Pelosi is by no means innocent in ANY of it, and her being caught in this one snafu should be played for all it's worth in the struggle to reduce tyranny.
God help us all ...