Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
And people tell me that China's social credit system hasn't arrived in America. It is but under the guise of PC culture. It just needs to be 'formalized'.
What if big tech censors Trump after the election? Big Tech major target is Trump and Trump needs to fight back against them.Social media censorship and the anti-white narrative is something that Trump should add to his list.
I don’t like the fact that Kushner is handling Trump campaign.
If he wins. Yeah, yeah positive energy all that. Just remember the elites know all this too. They won't let it happen. They will take care of it just like they did with Epstein. They thrive off the division and chaos anyway. As much as I want to believe, you just cannot undo the mass indoctrination of generations so easily. Every year the universities pump out a new generation of comrads and a larger number of patriots die.
Blockchain has the potential to free and secure public communications. We can use emerging cryptography to create an entirely new internet. This is being worked on now by many groups. It is why Facebook is attempting to push Libra while Peter Thiel is also quietly selecting and betting on blockchain orgs.
It won't matter how many lobbyists they buy after that. Especially since we are all completely sick of their institutions.
Sure, I'm going to butcher this a bit so do your own research. I type fast though so here goes.
Blockchain is one of several next generation technologies that are considered transformative (along with Internet of Things, 5g, machine learning, and material science). We are at the same phase of blockchain development that we were at with the internet in 1996. Very roughly and semi-accurately, blockchain is a mathematical and digital method of transcription.
We will be able to securely store all contracts and files within blockchain. It is unbreakable. Applications can be built on top of blockchain technology, the most well known would be Bitcoin or BTC. For commerce blockchain is a radically transformative technology.
Blockchain ledgers are just now beginning to see "use cases" emerge. That is the practical application of the technology. For example, blockchain can house all the deed records in the county. This would be a secure and un-hackable, permanent method of storage of the public record.
When it comes to personal communication a new generation of apps or dAPPS are being envisioned today. This includes new and honest means of advertising, and the social networking platform integrations to free us of centralization (i.e., entities that abuse their power like Google and Facebook) forever.
Perhaps most importantly, blockchain will be used at scale to automate many if not most white collar professions. This should be one of the top three topics in the presidential debate. Just like we human beings use messaging, contracts, and banking to negotiate blockchain will be the conversation medium of advanced artificial super-intelligence. That's not an idea, it's not scifi, it is a fact.
Elon and Tucker have discussed this publicly. The democrats are busy attempting a coup to retake trade policy so they can implement this technology in their vision. They are not interested in discussing this with us, which is one of the prime drivers for my contribution here.
I want to know more but crypto sketches me out still. I’m a computer scientist so it’s not lack of knowledge but it’s uncertainty around the macro effects of implementing crypto at scale
Would you be willing to help some pedes out and do a crypto breakdown? Ive been interested for years but haven’t completely wrapped my head around the world. This is the first time im seeing “defi”.
How does it work?
How are the different crytpos different from one another?
What would make sense to buy now, and why?
What is the process of buying and selling?
Bitcoin is the banking crypto. Easy to get with an account at most major banks. Sometimes there's rare Kiosks in major cities that sell bitcoin for cash. Once you have bitcoin or link your bank to a coin enchange, then you have access to the other crypto currencies.
Ethereum is for businesses making 3 plus party conditional transactions.
Monero is the most private coin. The gold standard of black market trade.
In 4th place is Dogecoin. It's basically Bitcoin with a 🐕 on it.
I wouldn't really bother with anything past that, unless you're day trading. Being able to spend the coins without having to convert back into cash is kind of the point.
Not sure if real, or another crypto hyper trying to get people to buy into one you're invested in, in hopes of raising demand. That said, I'm going to look into it! I'm always up for expanding my portfolio.
Agreed, but most of the trendy new cryptocurrency are glorified ponzi schemes. Spoiler alert: Any crypto that encourages hoarding is never going to take off.
yup and corporations can be as tyrannical as government. Gotta have regulations and checks and balances put into place to avoid things like censorship, social credit, etc. Most importantly, no monopolies!
When cash goes away, it's over. Everything, everywhere. Governments will be able to demand absolutely anything or you'll get your accounts zeroed/seized. And people will do exactly what they're told, no matter what it is.
Forever.
The only thing that would put and end to such a situation is a massive solar flare or EMP (i.e. don't count on it).
No one has the right to 'feel' any which way, one reason being they can simply claim feels in order to manipulate people. This is something that should be taught to everyone, that feeling safe isn't anywhere nearly as important as being safe, and speech (or lack of it) is not violence.
This "unsafe language" nonsense really needs to stop. In part, because it's conflating verbiage they disagree with with "literal violence."
It's interesting to me because your last statement raises the specter of what the left is really doing. On the one hand, they're shutting down discourse because it makes people "feel unsafe." On the other, they're letting literal rapists go because of "institutional racism" or some other idiotic excuse.
I suppose if it weren't for cognitive dissonance, the left wouldn't have any cognition.
No one has the right to 'feel' any which way, one reason being they can simply claim feels in order to manipulate people. This is something that should be taught to everyone, that feeling safe isn't anywhere nearly as important as being safe, and speech (or lack of it) is not violence.
I have to wonder if it's also a symptom of the removal of fact-based analysis from school curricula.
No one cares about facts. Only feelings. Once you eliminate analytical thought, replacing it with feelings and emotions, it's not hard to see how "words are violence" becomes a thing.
"PUNCH A NAZI" "WHITE SUPREMACIST!" "WHITE PRIVILEGE" "WHITES ARE LYNCHING PEOPLE, FAM AND MURDERING BLACK PEOPLE!"
The left is a cult of psychos who get riled up by their masters and freak out whenever directed. If anyone should be afraid and feel unsafe, it's a conservative. BLM isn't afraid of anybody. They are a violent opportunistic cult.
The "feel unsafe" thing is a legal code word. Rightfully, everyone should "feel unsafe" if this person is fired and because of the prospect of mobs with pitchforks storming the campus.
what really pisses me off is all these social media sites have a block button. If somebody offends you just fucking block them. It's a same thing in gaming, you could be reported for flaming somebody during a game and lose reputation points or whatever in the game you're playing ... if those faggots are offended, why don't they just mute you instead of running to their mommy crying like bitches? Imagine if we had this much pussies in the 1940s, nobody would have gotten out of the boats at Normandy.
Well, I won't back down
No, I won't back down
You can stand me up at the gates of hell
But I won't back down
Gonna stand my ground
Won't be turned around
And I'll keep this world from draggin' me down
Gonna stand my ground
And I won't back down
Hey, baby
There ain't no easy way out
Hey, I will stand my ground
And I won't back down
Well, I know what's right
I got just one life
In a world that keeps on pushin' me around
But I'll stand my ground
And I won't back down
Hey, baby
There ain't no easy way out
Hey, I will stand my ground
And I won't back down
No, I won't back down
She bent the knee on twitter. The article is about the stations board of directors trying to get her fired/make her resign which she won't do (even after she deleted the tween and apologized).
I just wish she wouldn't have deleted her post, and NEVER apologize. It's NEVER ENOUGH for these people. This could be her defining moment, to become the next James O'Keefe or Chanel Ryan.
A lengthy video conference on Tuesday night with Klein, the board of directors, faculty advisers, and more than 100 journalists and workers with The Blaze brought out diverse opinions, but no resolution.
Fucking honk. 100+ people to discuss a tweet they didn't like.
Colleges, Businesses, Government bodies, Federal Agencies all are starting to have special EEO officers who act as a panel of Judge Jury and Executioner for these types of situation. I can't wait until one goes to SCOTUS after Trump appoints 2 more.
I haven't read this link, but something stuck with me that I read about struggle sessions a while back: "The point of the struggle session is humiliation, so the charges don't need to be true to be effective. In fact, the less true they are, the more effective they are."
You can see that all over the place these days in areas leftists are. You can usually clue in on it when someone says "why would they say/do that? it doesn't make any sense." in reference to some leftist clownworld tactic.
Because it "hurts the Black Lives Matter movement." There was a quote from some student on another article about this situation that said that. Dug up the quote:
“Quoting the New York Post as a reputable source just kind of meant that she was throwing all of the education that we've gotten out the window, and it was kind of obvious that she just wanted to make a negative statement,” Shinn said. “She was trying to scapegoat a victim, she was trying to undermine the Black Lives Matter movement. To me, it seemed like she didn't care.”
The truth comes out at the end. They'll put whatever justifications they can think of in front of it, but at the end the real motive comes out - it "undermine(s) the Black Lives Matter movement." That's all that matters. The truth doesn't matter. They've decided that the movement is right, and must proceed by any means necessary. The facts of any individual case are irrelevant, and anyone who posts something harmful to the movement, even if it's completely true, is an enemy.
I mean, think like them for a moment. You either believe your cause is right or you support it to gain personal social power, doesn't matter which. So every argument you make, every action you take, is just to increase the power and support of the movement, because that's what's most important to you. So if you see someone post something that seems to contradict and undermine your own side, or support your opposition, you assume that they're doing the same thing as you - just for the other side. So rather than just thinking they might be posting some facts or working through an argument, you consider them an enemy who must be destroyed.
Absolutely, because you can easily take away their ability to make a living by simply pressuring their employers.
We're in a really dreadful spot right now, because the left has free reign to do what they like. Since most/many/all of the agitators don't have jobs, there's no way to retaliate.
The one guy complaining "we shouldn't publish radical opinions too far right or left" I'm so sick of this weak take. Who gets to decide an opinion is radical? I mean we all know the answer to that these days (spoiler it's the left). Christ, the UNITED FUCKING STATES was a radical idea at one time. We either have free speech or we don't, period.
Pretty sure her immediate career prospects are now dead. She can refuse not to resign all she wants but once they have you in their sights she is not going to escape the ultimate result they are demanding.
She miscalculated by thinking that rape accusations override 'racial justice' 2 months out from an election where the left is upping the racebaiting to levels not seen in our lifetimes to stop potential black votes going to Trump.
I think the opposite is true. This is an excellent opportunity to step into the world of independent journalism and avoid becoming a cog in the propaganda machine.
Though before she does that, she should go out in a blaze of glory and try to maximize exposure.
Deleted tweet. Doesn't think police behaved appropriately. Doesn't think Blake deserved to be shot. Sounds like she backed down from what ever they were accusing her of already.
They want to ingrain the narrative that these criminals were angels and could do no wrong. Its a symptom of them being brainwashed by socialism their whole eduction to the point they can just brainwash themselves.
That if you even showed them evidence and it was something they can touch with their own hands they still wouldn't believe you.
Oh imagine that, the Marxists are trying to silence an opinion they don't like again because they're too full of Schiff to win an argument on the merits.
Telling the truth violates journalistic integrity. Tje kid that said that should go be a janitor if he is intelligent enough as that job requires some knowledge.
Putting out opinions that may seem political, too left or right, are deeply, deeply frowned upon in our business as journalists. We are taught that if you are to do that while working... don't be surprised if you lose your job.
"Putting out opinions that may seem political, too left or right, are deeply, deeply frowned upon in our business as journalists" HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
"Always more to the story, folks. Please read this article to get the background of Jacob Blake’s warrant. You’ll be quite disgusted."
There's absolutely nothing objectional about this, except perhaps that it undermines the absurd leftist narrative. She's literally just pointing at the arrest warrant. She didn't say he deserved to be shot or anything else. The cancel culture is at an extreme where zero dissent or contradiction to the narrative is ever allowed.
Personally, I think the police made the right call. A violent criminal that just fought with them, was armed with a knife, is climbing into a car that he doesn't own with some kids.
An alternative version of these events is that police let a violent felon rapist drive away in a stolen vehicle, and those kids died.
Can't be a leftist without lying, can't be a democrat without lying, and can't support BLM without lying. She tweeted the truth, and it offended the liars.
"Putting out opinions that may seem political, too left or right, are deeply, deeply frowned upon in our business as journalists. We are taught that if you are to do that while working... don't be surprised if you lose your job."
And people tell me that China's social credit system hasn't arrived in America. It is but under the guise of PC culture. It just needs to be 'formalized'.
America’s is perhaps even more efficient since it’s done by the free market rather than the government.
God bless the free market. My only question is when is the market correction for all this far left bullshit.
Right after the election, one way or another, this shit is going to stop.
What if big tech censors Trump after the election? Big Tech major target is Trump and Trump needs to fight back against them.Social media censorship and the anti-white narrative is something that Trump should add to his list.
I don’t like the fact that Kushner is handling Trump campaign.
It's ok after the election.. he's not running for re-election and can finally start hammering the deep state.
Do you think Trump should crack down on “Critical race theory” now?
Now? How about 4 years ago.
I have been predicting a 9/11 or mass shooting terror attack close to the election...
If it doesn't happen then, the leftists will make it happen by any means necessary
If he wins. Yeah, yeah positive energy all that. Just remember the elites know all this too. They won't let it happen. They will take care of it just like they did with Epstein. They thrive off the division and chaos anyway. As much as I want to believe, you just cannot undo the mass indoctrination of generations so easily. Every year the universities pump out a new generation of comrads and a larger number of patriots die.
Blockchain has the potential to free and secure public communications. We can use emerging cryptography to create an entirely new internet. This is being worked on now by many groups. It is why Facebook is attempting to push Libra while Peter Thiel is also quietly selecting and betting on blockchain orgs.
It won't matter how many lobbyists they buy after that. Especially since we are all completely sick of their institutions.
For those of us who are unaware of it, can you elaborate on what block chain is and how it provides a better internet?
Sure, I'm going to butcher this a bit so do your own research. I type fast though so here goes.
Blockchain is one of several next generation technologies that are considered transformative (along with Internet of Things, 5g, machine learning, and material science). We are at the same phase of blockchain development that we were at with the internet in 1996. Very roughly and semi-accurately, blockchain is a mathematical and digital method of transcription.
We will be able to securely store all contracts and files within blockchain. It is unbreakable. Applications can be built on top of blockchain technology, the most well known would be Bitcoin or BTC. For commerce blockchain is a radically transformative technology.
Blockchain ledgers are just now beginning to see "use cases" emerge. That is the practical application of the technology. For example, blockchain can house all the deed records in the county. This would be a secure and un-hackable, permanent method of storage of the public record.
When it comes to personal communication a new generation of apps or dAPPS are being envisioned today. This includes new and honest means of advertising, and the social networking platform integrations to free us of centralization (i.e., entities that abuse their power like Google and Facebook) forever.
Perhaps most importantly, blockchain will be used at scale to automate many if not most white collar professions. This should be one of the top three topics in the presidential debate. Just like we human beings use messaging, contracts, and banking to negotiate blockchain will be the conversation medium of advanced artificial super-intelligence. That's not an idea, it's not scifi, it is a fact.
Elon and Tucker have discussed this publicly. The democrats are busy attempting a coup to retake trade policy so they can implement this technology in their vision. They are not interested in discussing this with us, which is one of the prime drivers for my contribution here.
Here is the wiki article on the technology:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockchain
How you figure?
Sure hope you're right, but I don't see it.
Cold Rage.
We do not negotiate with terrorists. We do not make peace with evil.
Decentralisation on the blockchain is the key. DeFi is blowing up. Will soon have fuck you money from it.
I want to know more but crypto sketches me out still. I’m a computer scientist so it’s not lack of knowledge but it’s uncertainty around the macro effects of implementing crypto at scale
I would be extremely careful. Crypto can be very volatile and it seems that chinese crypto farms are having a huge impact on crypto currencies.
China of all places has the system down pat.
Would you be willing to help some pedes out and do a crypto breakdown? Ive been interested for years but haven’t completely wrapped my head around the world. This is the first time im seeing “defi”.
How does it work? How are the different crytpos different from one another? What would make sense to buy now, and why? What is the process of buying and selling?
Bitcoin is the banking crypto. Easy to get with an account at most major banks. Sometimes there's rare Kiosks in major cities that sell bitcoin for cash. Once you have bitcoin or link your bank to a coin enchange, then you have access to the other crypto currencies.
Ethereum is for businesses making 3 plus party conditional transactions.
Monero is the most private coin. The gold standard of black market trade.
In 4th place is Dogecoin. It's basically Bitcoin with a 🐕 on it.
I wouldn't really bother with anything past that, unless you're day trading. Being able to spend the coins without having to convert back into cash is kind of the point.
Look into Fantom and Andre Cronje. *this is not financial advice
whoever has the most processing power wins.
Not sure if real, or another crypto hyper trying to get people to buy into one you're invested in, in hopes of raising demand. That said, I'm going to look into it! I'm always up for expanding my portfolio.
Agreed, but most of the trendy new cryptocurrency are glorified ponzi schemes. Spoiler alert: Any crypto that encourages hoarding is never going to take off.
Careful with that defi
You can get money off yield farming, but you can get skull fucked too.
Long term, defi is a meme that goes nowhere - USD works fine as a currency (medium of exchange) and the fed hates competition.
A decade or crypto and nothing has de-coupled from BTC.
Not hatin. I own a ton of ALGO and made some money off LINK, but defi isn’t real, so get your gains and get out.
yup and corporations can be as tyrannical as government. Gotta have regulations and checks and balances put into place to avoid things like censorship, social credit, etc. Most importantly, no monopolies!
don't forget the adage, "the market can remain insane for longer than you can remain solvent."
We are it.
You say that, but let's look at the funding of BLM.
Fun fact: Zhima/Sesame scoring IS a private business.
The powers that be are just a lot less subtle about things in the case of China...
When cash goes away, it's over. Everything, everywhere. Governments will be able to demand absolutely anything or you'll get your accounts zeroed/seized. And people will do exactly what they're told, no matter what it is.
Forever.
The only thing that would put and end to such a situation is a massive solar flare or EMP (i.e. don't count on it).
You can climb back with social credit. With SJWs if you made one wrong post on MySpace when you were 14 you get unpersoned
'Her tweets made us feel unsafe'
I hate this shit. If a tweet scares you then get off twitter
You know what else makes people not feel safe? Being raped
'Her tweets made us feel unsafe'
Next sentence should be " That is your problem child, move on".
No one has the right to 'feel' any which way, one reason being they can simply claim feels in order to manipulate people. This is something that should be taught to everyone, that feeling safe isn't anywhere nearly as important as being safe, and speech (or lack of it) is not violence.
"Your tweet made me feel unsafe"
"Your haircut makes me feel unsafe. I'll delete my tweet if you shave your head. And your eyebrows. They're hurtful too."
This "unsafe language" nonsense really needs to stop. In part, because it's conflating verbiage they disagree with with "literal violence."
It's interesting to me because your last statement raises the specter of what the left is really doing. On the one hand, they're shutting down discourse because it makes people "feel unsafe." On the other, they're letting literal rapists go because of "institutional racism" or some other idiotic excuse.
I suppose if it weren't for cognitive dissonance, the left wouldn't have any cognition.
No one has the right to 'feel' any which way, one reason being they can simply claim feels in order to manipulate people. This is something that should be taught to everyone, that feeling safe isn't anywhere nearly as important as being safe, and speech (or lack of it) is not violence.
I have to wonder if it's also a symptom of the removal of fact-based analysis from school curricula.
No one cares about facts. Only feelings. Once you eliminate analytical thought, replacing it with feelings and emotions, it's not hard to see how "words are violence" becomes a thing.
You know what else needs to stop before we can start having a genuine bipartisan discussion in this country?
The sneering accusatory tone the left adopt when they do do us the courtesty of conversing with us.
"PUNCH A NAZI" "WHITE SUPREMACIST!" "WHITE PRIVILEGE" "WHITES ARE LYNCHING PEOPLE, FAM AND MURDERING BLACK PEOPLE!"
The left is a cult of psychos who get riled up by their masters and freak out whenever directed. If anyone should be afraid and feel unsafe, it's a conservative. BLM isn't afraid of anybody. They are a violent opportunistic cult.
Yea and people tweeting support for BLM terrorists makes me feel "unsafe". So why are those tweets allowed.
Why are tweets celebrating and worshiping criminals and celebrities allowed because those also make me feel "unsafe".
Haha don't speak fluent jogger.. think you did a pretty good job
The "feel unsafe" thing is a legal code word. Rightfully, everyone should "feel unsafe" if this person is fired and because of the prospect of mobs with pitchforks storming the campus.
lmao
what really pisses me off is all these social media sites have a block button. If somebody offends you just fucking block them. It's a same thing in gaming, you could be reported for flaming somebody during a game and lose reputation points or whatever in the game you're playing ... if those faggots are offended, why don't they just mute you instead of running to their mommy crying like bitches? Imagine if we had this much pussies in the 1940s, nobody would have gotten out of the boats at Normandy.
If it were the 1940s those people would be marching behind the soviet infantry shooting anyone who wasnt sufficiently for the motherland.
Well, I won't back down No, I won't back down You can stand me up at the gates of hell But I won't back down Gonna stand my ground Won't be turned around And I'll keep this world from draggin' me down Gonna stand my ground And I won't back down Hey, baby There ain't no easy way out Hey, I will stand my ground And I won't back down Well, I know what's right I got just one life In a world that keeps on pushin' me around But I'll stand my ground And I won't back down Hey, baby There ain't no easy way out Hey, I will stand my ground And I won't back down No, I won't back down
Am I reading this wrong? It looks like she deleted the tweet and apologized...
https://twitter.com/RaeLeeKlein/status/1299841627456856065
She bent the knee on twitter. The article is about the stations board of directors trying to get her fired/make her resign which she won't do (even after she deleted the tween and apologized).
She backed down, apologized and all she is doing now is trying to save her career.
Shouldn’t have backed down or apologized. Look where it got her
Never apologize to a mob. - Jordan B Peterson.
I just wish she wouldn't have deleted her post, and NEVER apologize. It's NEVER ENOUGH for these people. This could be her defining moment, to become the next James O'Keefe or Chanel Ryan.
Fucking honk. 100+ people to discuss a tweet they didn't like.
Times are way too good in America today.
Colleges, Businesses, Government bodies, Federal Agencies all are starting to have special EEO officers who act as a panel of Judge Jury and Executioner for these types of situation. I can't wait until one goes to SCOTUS after Trump appoints 2 more.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Struggle_session
I haven't read this link, but something stuck with me that I read about struggle sessions a while back: "The point of the struggle session is humiliation, so the charges don't need to be true to be effective. In fact, the less true they are, the more effective they are."
You can see that all over the place these days in areas leftists are. You can usually clue in on it when someone says "why would they say/do that? it doesn't make any sense." in reference to some leftist clownworld tactic.
Because it "hurts the Black Lives Matter movement." There was a quote from some student on another article about this situation that said that. Dug up the quote:
The truth comes out at the end. They'll put whatever justifications they can think of in front of it, but at the end the real motive comes out - it "undermine(s) the Black Lives Matter movement." That's all that matters. The truth doesn't matter. They've decided that the movement is right, and must proceed by any means necessary. The facts of any individual case are irrelevant, and anyone who posts something harmful to the movement, even if it's completely true, is an enemy.
I mean, think like them for a moment. You either believe your cause is right or you support it to gain personal social power, doesn't matter which. So every argument you make, every action you take, is just to increase the power and support of the movement, because that's what's most important to you. So if you see someone post something that seems to contradict and undermine your own side, or support your opposition, you assume that they're doing the same thing as you - just for the other side. So rather than just thinking they might be posting some facts or working through an argument, you consider them an enemy who must be destroyed.
could vaguely make sense, depending, if it was a tweet from the president of the USA
but it's a 21 year old college student
This is all she posted correct?
You cannot reason with these people.
Wow. What happened to protecting women?
https://nypost.com/2020/08/28/this-is-why-jacob-blake-had-a-warrant-out-for-his-arrest/
Right?!? I thought BLM was all about dismantling the patriarchy and supporting black women/mothers. That's what it says on their website anyways.
Saying rape is disgusting gets you cancelled. Very feminist!
Imagine being against integrity
Let me introduce you to the Marxist left
So few people have been for integrity. It wasn't mentioned at all in 2016.
She deleted the "offensive" tweet, she backed down already.
Edit. The tweet was a RETWEET of an article that was his warrant? jmj
We let ourselves get browbeaten because we don't want our careers or lives ruined.
The left has been waging economic and social warfare for a long time in part because it is so successful.
That is what really needs to stop before we can get a handle on things.
Its pretty easy to blackmail people who want to work, support themselves and others.
Absolutely, because you can easily take away their ability to make a living by simply pressuring their employers.
We're in a really dreadful spot right now, because the left has free reign to do what they like. Since most/many/all of the agitators don't have jobs, there's no way to retaliate.
If I know about this, then it's way too late for her
The one guy complaining "we shouldn't publish radical opinions too far right or left" I'm so sick of this weak take. Who gets to decide an opinion is radical? I mean we all know the answer to that these days (spoiler it's the left). Christ, the UNITED FUCKING STATES was a radical idea at one time. We either have free speech or we don't, period.
I do. And I hereby declare that saying "men who rape women are disgusting" is NOT a radical position.
Username doesn't check out 😂
It just means he is left. Common sense is considered “too far right”.
Criminal Lives Matter! ✊🏿
American university. She better watch herself! they’ll have her killed!
Arizona State?
Almost just as cucked
It has started creeping in to a few courses. At least in online courses in the Engineering school at Polytechnic.
ASU is pretty good. They have their share of left wing fuckers but overall faculty are not as cucked as in many other places.
My b 😹 they would kill her here in DC tho. I live right by it, in Virginia a mere 40 minutes away
Yes for sure and in Baltimore too. Prides of the DNC.
Title is wrong she already backed down deleted post apologized cucked out big time. Whatever.
In her defense I’m sure the BLM rape threats are serious. Numbers don’t lie.
She did the right thing. She spoke up and now it's news. No sense in dying on that hill.
Pretty sure her immediate career prospects are now dead. She can refuse not to resign all she wants but once they have you in their sights she is not going to escape the ultimate result they are demanding.
She miscalculated by thinking that rape accusations override 'racial justice' 2 months out from an election where the left is upping the racebaiting to levels not seen in our lifetimes to stop potential black votes going to Trump.
I think the opposite is true. This is an excellent opportunity to step into the world of independent journalism and avoid becoming a cog in the propaganda machine.
Though before she does that, she should go out in a blaze of glory and try to maximize exposure.
Pointing out the jogger's history of rape is rayciss!
They always want people to resign or beg forgiveness. Never do either.
Don't be like Drew Brees, be a man, not a pussy.
That's not the hill to die on. She did everything correct: speak up, make news, back down.
It's a tactical strike and hopefully she avoids being gang raped.
Think I got the aids from that site
Internet is a nasty ho, but still cleaner than DNC media outlets.
Better than covid, man.
To be fair, unless you're actively standing up to the mob, then it's not ok to judge others for backing down. At least she tried.
At the very least you should be sporting a MAGA hat daily and flying a Trump flag on your vehicle before criticizing.
Ordinarily I'd be like "a bunch of leftys are protesting me? meh i could lose a few friends on social media, and it will die down eventually."
But BLM in 2020...I'd consider it a mortal threat and would expect them to find me soon.
Yeah, she was risking gang rape and murder. That's no hill to die on without 24/7 patriot protection. It was a good tactical strike.
She shares a New York Post article and says the actions of Jacob Blake against the woman were disgusting.
That's it.
Never back down!
DOUBLE DOWN!
Lead by example
if she apologizes - they'll never let it go.
already did.
Deleted tweet. Doesn't think police behaved appropriately. Doesn't think Blake deserved to be shot. Sounds like she backed down from what ever they were accusing her of already.
They will just remove her.
They want to ingrain the narrative that these criminals were angels and could do no wrong. Its a symptom of them being brainwashed by socialism their whole eduction to the point they can just brainwash themselves.
That if you even showed them evidence and it was something they can touch with their own hands they still wouldn't believe you.
Two incidents described in the same article, same paragraph:
"Blake's shooting in the back...by police"
"followed by the deadly shooting of two protesters by a teen armed with a rifle."
What's not included is just as important as what is.
Stay strong. And never give in to them. The truth is like a weapon we wield. They are afraid of it.
Isn’t there a sword of truth in World of Warcraft or something?
Blm is a domestic hate/terrorist organization
Oh imagine that, the Marxists are trying to silence an opinion they don't like again because they're too full of Schiff to win an argument on the merits.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8i5NLyXZdc
Not reporting the facts about a rapist who fought police should be grounds for dismissal. Clown world activated.
Ah, yes, those pesky, triggering facts.
Telling the truth violates journalistic integrity. Tje kid that said that should go be a janitor if he is intelligent enough as that job requires some knowledge.
Agreed. I got a hard wall to either take down my adblock or to make a donation to them to read one fucking article. Fuck those jerks
She shouldn't back down. Fucking leftist scumbag fascist mother fuckers!
Boy do I have news for this kid....
$5 says they weren't even listening to ASU radio to begin with. Fuck 'em.
How is she refusing to back down if she deleted the tweet and apologized?
"Putting out opinions that may seem political, too left or right, are deeply, deeply frowned upon in our business as journalists" HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Huh, there always seems to be a RACIALLY CHARGED SCANDAL. It's non-stop. Always.
ANd here's the MASSIVELY CONTROVERSIAL TWEET THAT CAUSED SCANDAL!!!
"Always more to the story, folks. Please read this article to get the background of Jacob Blake’s warrant. You’ll be quite disgusted."
You gotta wonder what exactly is so bad about this...what are they after.
There's absolutely nothing objectional about this, except perhaps that it undermines the absurd leftist narrative. She's literally just pointing at the arrest warrant. She didn't say he deserved to be shot or anything else. The cancel culture is at an extreme where zero dissent or contradiction to the narrative is ever allowed.
Personally, I think the police made the right call. A violent criminal that just fought with them, was armed with a knife, is climbing into a car that he doesn't own with some kids.
An alternative version of these events is that police let a violent felon rapist drive away in a stolen vehicle, and those kids died.
Blake is a piece of shit and gave the police little recourse but to shoot him. I’m sick of tiptoeing around that.
Fucking shit, did you guys read:
They had A HUNDRED PEOPLE on this conference. She had to defend herself when they literally outnumbered her 100:1.
It's bad either way, but it's not like it was just a one on one with some director or something. What the fuck is this dystopian nightmare?
Freedom Of speech wants to destroy the left.
And Freedom Of Speech has the most guns. >:)
Can't be a leftist without lying, can't be a democrat without lying, and can't support BLM without lying. She tweeted the truth, and it offended the liars.
My sides