They won't. They are bad people who don't play by the rules. Oh, sorry, allow me to rephrase: they are bad people who only play by their OWN rules. My place my rule, take it or leave it, that's their logic. Their sin is pretending to be a public platform when it has transformed into a publisher, and the transformation dramatically accelerated since Trump won. On top of that, they are a monopoly. They have a division that is assigned to detect and investigate any startups that may have potential and pose a threat to their business, then they will nip them in the bud.
The problem is this has been done a few times and it immediately turns to 100% shitposting, which Is funny and all, but guarantees the platform won’t attract moderate/regular everyday users.
Luckily the platform I’m building gives room for everyone to use the platform and not be bombarded with things they don’t want to see.
That's a long way to simply say big social media needs to be classified as a publisher, not a platform.
No, it's better to force them open (platform). Then make them follow the rules. No playing favorites. Common carrier.
They won't. They are bad people who don't play by the rules. Oh, sorry, allow me to rephrase: they are bad people who only play by their OWN rules. My place my rule, take it or leave it, that's their logic. Their sin is pretending to be a public platform when it has transformed into a publisher, and the transformation dramatically accelerated since Trump won. On top of that, they are a monopoly. They have a division that is assigned to detect and investigate any startups that may have potential and pose a threat to their business, then they will nip them in the bud.
The problem is this has been done a few times and it immediately turns to 100% shitposting, which Is funny and all, but guarantees the platform won’t attract moderate/regular everyday users.
Luckily the platform I’m building gives room for everyone to use the platform and not be bombarded with things they don’t want to see.