5946
Comments (1313)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
132
somethingnew 132 points ago +133 / -1

As I said in another thread about this:

Seems like someone is doing some cleaning to bury this story. This moron probably got himself killed by giving that interview.

Wonder who is behind this whole thing?

104
Click [S] 104 points ago +108 / -4

This guy was retarded, a useful idiot.

Not only did he fuck up and not fully cover his neck tattoo and not wear easily-identifiable clothing before committing the murder, he then did the VICE interview admitting he murdered Jay.

He had to be disposed of. Immediately.

71
ElGuapo 71 points ago +71 / -0

I think a lot of people imagine “hitmen” like this waste of life to be these suave, John Wick types and they’re not. They’re usually low IQ sociopaths who can’t hold down a job and get turned and burned. He was used to try to kick off another war and it’s still not working.

47
Click [S] 47 points ago +51 / -4

There are definitely professional hitmen / assassins out there. Their hits usually turn into "suicides," missing persons case, or you never hear about it at all.

This guy was not a professional. He just wanted to shoot Trump supporters. Not sure if it's a hit, but it was definitely planned out. 2 vehicles scouted and spotted Jay, called him out, and this moron took the shot.

26
ElGuapo 26 points ago +26 / -0

I meant to imply this guy was no hitman (as some were painting him) but a useful idiot. A real hitman wouldn’t have been so stupid/sloppy/careless.

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
18
Pillage 18 points ago +18 / -0

Yup now this story goes away. No trial, no evidence, no witnesses. Just straight down the ole memory hole.

13
JackLemon 13 points ago +13 / -0

With the fortuitous Vice story telling the world that the murder wasn't a bad guy and that he had to act to protect a woman from an evil Trump supporter. That will now be the story the corrupt fake news media will promote and their consumers will believe it. How convenient that the murderer dies just hour later.

11
TheOutlawPepeWales 11 points ago +11 / -0

A public "confession" puts all the blame on his shoulders alone. Was he trying to be a martyr, knowing that he was going to go out fighting, or was he duped into giving the interview by someone in the system who never intended to have him arrested peacefully? The world may never know.

4
JackLemon 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wouldn't be surprised Vice was used as well. They gave plausibly to his story about it being a heroic act to save a woman from an evil Trump supporter. The fakes news media and their Dummycrat consumers will believe it. With his death it won't be challenged.

4
Deathlessly 4 points ago +5 / -1

CIA didn't assassinate leaders. They turn the population against them.

You only get up close when you have to or if you have a gigantic ego.

4
JackLemon 4 points ago +4 / -0

Are you kidding? It is an undeniable and unassailable fact that the CIA tried to kill Castro dozens of times. There is also the matter of the death bed confession of CIA agent Hunt that the CIA was involved in the JFK assination. The CIA has been proven to be behind many assassinations.

2
Deathlessly 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's when they did it themselves because they had to.

If they didn't have to, they usually manipulate and pay off others.

31
Kek_mit_uns 31 points ago +32 / -1

Wouldn't doubt that Vice is in on it.

17
acecas3 17 points ago +18 / -1

Easy way of getting out of paying him for the interview tbh

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
5
Trudict 5 points ago +5 / -0

Was the interview bad or good?

It seems like he was able to get Vice to publish his manifesto far and wide and now that he's dead a true investigation won't happen and now he's a martyr... all the lefties will buy his story that he shot Danielson in self-defence and the cops killed him because that's apparently what cops do.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
4
ivan_iii_of_russia 4 points ago +4 / -0

They also spent most of the interview degrading right-wing extremism even though the guy essentially admits that he killed them for political reasons. The interview gives no reason for a "self-defense" claim. He never claims to have any reason to feel threatened except that they were "right wing" and because he was confident that "they weren't innocent."