The language of the times article is rather stunning. They prop him up as a valorous person who protects people and deescalates potentially violent confrontations. His actions, however, tell a completely different story. The Times is run by desperate propagandists, and the article on Reinoehl's death is atrociously biased.
Its not a disgrace. The New York Times is enemy propaganda. Its deliberatly attempting to destroy/unravel the united states. I feel that "disgrace" isnt really severe enough a term to describe them. They're leading a communist revolution. Its really tough to think of a single word that can capture how dangerous they are. Closest thing i can think of is domestic terrorists. The NYT is the voice of the enemy. The shield of the left. The poison that's rotting us from the inside. "Enemies of the Union" might fit. I don't mean to ramble lol, sorry. I'm just sorta thinking out loud... In writing ...
The language of the times article is rather stunning. They prop him up as a valorous person who protects people and deescalates potentially violent confrontations. His actions, however, tell a completely different story. The Times is run by desperate propagandists, and the article on Reinoehl's death is atrociously biased.
Its fucking disgusting. The NYTimes is a disgrace.
Its not a disgrace. The New York Times is enemy propaganda. Its deliberatly attempting to destroy/unravel the united states. I feel that "disgrace" isnt really severe enough a term to describe them. They're leading a communist revolution. Its really tough to think of a single word that can capture how dangerous they are. Closest thing i can think of is domestic terrorists. The NYT is the voice of the enemy. The shield of the left. The poison that's rotting us from the inside. "Enemies of the Union" might fit. I don't mean to ramble lol, sorry. I'm just sorta thinking out loud... In writing ...