478
Webster's defines retarded thusly: (www.breitbart.com) 🐂 Bullshit 💩
posted ago by ThatGuyFromFark ago by ThatGuyFromFark +478 / -0
Comments (24)
sorted by:
13
ElvenGhostAgent 13 points ago +13 / -0

Truely living in a clown world when Webster blindly goes along with the woke far left’s definition of their terms.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
9
ElvenGhostAgent 9 points ago +9 / -0

I’m that guy in The Day After Tomorrow clutching the Bible to prevent it from being used as fire kindling. Only I’m clutching four additional books: A dictionary not infected with wokeism, History of the United States, and History of the World, and the United States Constitution.

6
STEVE_HUFFMANS_BULL 6 points ago +6 / -0

It’s only a matter of time before the Book of Eli is no longer fiction...

2
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, I give it six months before every city in California looks like the set from the book of Eli.

3
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you can never get your hands on a mid to late 1800's dictionary, just reading the definitions of certain words will she'd a lot of light on how far we have fallen down the "woke" rabbit hole.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
Food4thought 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm going to send them a letter. Since we're just making shit up, they need to add "Blumpkin" to their site.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/contact-us

9
muy_libre 9 points ago +9 / -0

Male: dick and balls

Female: twat and uterus

It really is that simple, liberals.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
ElvenGhostAgent 2 points ago +2 / -0

“BuT MuH 9001 GeNdErS!!!” - Libtards

6
Siteless_Vagrant 6 points ago +6 / -0

So now the dictionary people are playing into the mental disorder. What the actual fuck.

5
yallsegregationist 5 points ago +5 / -0

they’ve lost all credibility

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
GreyKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kinda like the Democrats who have nothing but being "Not Trump"

1
KungFluFighter 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you read the article then you see the feminists are PISSED at the strange, self-sausage slicers. So this may end up being better than imaged....let the left continue to devour itself...

1
WonkoTheSane 1 point ago +1 / -0

A bit of the history of gender. Fucking sick.

https://mobile.twitter.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1301209632455749635

1
BananaWizard 1 point ago +2 / -1

It's an addition, a lot of times they add more definitions. They don't typically remove any.

1): of, relating to, or being the sex that typically has the capacity to bear young or produce eggs

1
ILearnedToCode 1 point ago +1 / -0

The "addition" they made completely negates the definition they added it to. Thats like making an "addition" to the definition of water, and saying that water is a solid object that does not conform to it's container, while keeping the original definition of water also

1
CleanYourRoom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Having a Gender Identity That Is the Opposite of Male

So there are just the two genders then?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0