23
posted ago by JustTheNews ago by JustTheNews +23 / -0

Sorry may not be a popular opinion here, but if you are going to protect a building or counter protest do not RETREAT in fear after 35 minutes. All that did was make them feel they can beat us.

Highly detrimental to everything. Made everyone on our side look like straight pussies. Any retard can show up and act tough. But you showed up armed (highly armed) and then leave

Comments (15)
sorted by:
6
USvsFlynn 6 points ago +6 / -0

I have a different view on this. We need to be the ones walking away when Antifa & BLM try to escalate. That way the militias are seen as the level headed ones that are working toward peaceful protest. Right now it is all about optics. I would rather look like a pussy then to encourage further physical confrontation. The media is yearning for a Trump supporter to do something so that they can throw us all in a coffin and bury us in the public eye.

EDIT: Also, the police just came out.. The militia walking away was perfect because now BLM/Antifa will start assaulting police and get their heads cracked.

-1
JustTheNews [S] -1 points ago +3 / -4

No if you go in and get people hyper then leave you are just endangering the city and people and business who live there.....if you are going in LIKE THEY DID armed to the teeth, go to stay or take control, or do not go at all....then the guy on live stream was like "We are trying to retreat" even the BLM guy was like "WTF" like he was disappointed about how big of a pussy word that is./

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
-2
deleted -2 points ago +5 / -7
5
USvsFlynn 5 points ago +5 / -0

Nah, I am not saying be weak. I am saying be strong by choosing your battles. If you fight every battle you are engaged in, you are fighting under the conditions that your enemy sets.

We can differ on opinion.

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
4
Jadeity2 4 points ago +4 / -0

No one’s on the fence, focus on winning the war, not the battle.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
irspow 4 points ago +4 / -0

I give them a little credit for showing up. Them saying that they were there only to counter NFAC is fine. But, yeah, at times the leader seemed to be willing to give blowjobs to BLM people to show his support for them. It was hard to watch. It’s not like NFAC is burning down cities everywhere, it is BLM/Antifa doing so.

2
Covfefe_Injection 2 points ago +2 / -0

Was that the proud boys rally we were talking about a couple days ago? The feed was taken down by youtoob.

1
JustTheNews [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

no the live stream right now

1
Fremium2020 1 point ago +2 / -1

Translation:

I'M BORED AND WANT SOME ENTERTAINMENT TO GO WITH MY TENDIES!!!!

1
JustTheNews [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

i dont know how staying home would be entertainment. all i am saying is place the mission first. If you went there to protect somthing protect it. Imagine if the cops ran into a house swatting it, then ran out and drove away. It makes no sense, it would be like thenormandy landings running to the first sea wall then running back and trying to swim back to the transport ship

1
Fremium2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

None of these guys ever go there with a "mission" other than to apparently get as close to the BLM-tards as fast as they can and then walk aimlessly around doing nothing, getting into random fist-fights. I never see them ever protecting anything other than gas stations most of the darn time.

And I'm more than sure these undisciplined idiots will have a few guys hang around after dark all by-themselves looking for BLM-ers to make themselves known to, and then they will get into some sort of argument until a gun goes off.

1
JustTheNews [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

People wont agree with our opinions. I guess maybe them showing up will make other people show up who are not lead by a guy in a viking helmet hiding behind a telephone pole. red flag from the start