97
Comments (70)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
7
onlnpkr 7 points ago +7 / -0

the entire russian propaganda thing consisted of $100,000, and much was spent after the campaign. Michael moore even participated in a russia promoted protest against trump https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5413699/Michael-Moore-participated-rally-organized-Russians.html.
Russia helped and hurt all candidates. Tell him to look at the adds that were run https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/01/us/politics/russia-2016-election-facebook. the adds were a joke. the election wasnt changed.

the mueler report facts.. Mueler didnt have enough evidence but didnt want to exonerate trump, He hoped congress would impeach but there was no there there. https://www.cato.org/blog/mueller-report-faqs?gclid=CjwKCAjwkdL6BRAREiwA-kiczC1LVSxNfTSlFMThI5_gNBo_1LLA3FEbhbuHrXDBZBYEkxfCv29PDhoCLYAQAvD_BwE

Manafort did not hand over polling data to the russians. He shared polling data with a ukranian business associate of his that the cia says was believed to have ties to russia, but no evidence he was tied to russia government or that he shared the info with russia. Manafort lied that he gave data to his business partner and was charged with lying, not collusion.

https://apnews.com/608b9fcbca5941348e2ac8796e94c8cd

3
whocaresguy420 3 points ago +3 / -0

If 100k in ads could so easily sway an election how did Bloomberg lose?