For the sake of conversation, let's say their calculations are correct. I'd like to ask these assholes if they think that's any consolation to the people who were robbed, beaten, maimed or killed, or had their businesses burned to the ground, or their cars or homes vandalized and set afire, etc., in the violent 7%.
A rate of 7% being violent is HORRIBLE. On what planet is that a success? It only takes a tiny minority to cause tremendous damage, and 7% is not tiny.
If the 93% aren't that way, why aren't they airing that 93% condemning the 7%? Some of them do, and the media doesn't give them a voice. And some of them do not. The number of non-rioters who support the rioters are frightening.
Where are the stories about peaceful protestors in skirmishes with non-peaceful protestors? We have seen a few here. Are there any left?
So if that's 1000 people pictured in the street, only 70 of them are violent. Really, what harm could only 70 violent and hysterical people with weapons and molotovs do in a few hours?
I'd believe it. There have been little BLM protests in nearly every city in the country.
Look at it this way. This headline means "7% of BLM protests have resulted in cities being burned to the ground, businesses being looted, or people being murdered"
That add placement though!!!! spicy AF 🔥 🔥 🔥
LOL... should say REPLACEMENT Windows! .... LOL
Kek!
99% of police interactions are peaceful... but here we are.
For the sake of conversation, let's say their calculations are correct. I'd like to ask these assholes if they think that's any consolation to the people who were robbed, beaten, maimed or killed, or had their businesses burned to the ground, or their cars or homes vandalized and set afire, etc., in the violent 7%.
This soda is 93% not poison.
93% means nothing when looting and burning down buildings is considered peaceful.
What we call the 3%, they call the 7%
That report is faker than Pelosi's tits.
93% means nothing when looting and burning down buildings is considered peaceful.
Doesn't matter. Our "lived experience" is that BLM is violent
"All 17 Intelligence Agencies agree..."
🙄.. ✊🏿 🔥 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Mostly peaceful person only killed 7% of the people he knew.
A rate of 7% being violent is HORRIBLE. On what planet is that a success? It only takes a tiny minority to cause tremendous damage, and 7% is not tiny.
If the 93% aren't that way, why aren't they airing that 93% condemning the 7%? Some of them do, and the media doesn't give them a voice. And some of them do not. The number of non-rioters who support the rioters are frightening.
Where are the stories about peaceful protestors in skirmishes with non-peaceful protestors? We have seen a few here. Are there any left?
I suspect it includes all the "protests" where a handful of fat white liberal women "protest" by holding signs up on a street corner.
The Left teaches that "offensive words are violence" and that "silence is violence".
93% of Time magazine stories are idiotic. The other 7% are really idiotic.
How did they arrive at the number?
84% of all statistics are made up.
So if that's 1000 people pictured in the street, only 70 of them are violent. Really, what harm could only 70 violent and hysterical people with weapons and molotovs do in a few hours?
I'd believe it. There have been little BLM protests in nearly every city in the country.
Look at it this way. This headline means "7% of BLM protests have resulted in cities being burned to the ground, businesses being looted, or people being murdered"
Lmao we install windows
To use their own words:
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem.
So you're saying they are mostly peaceful....
87% of all statistics are made up on the spot.