Genuine respect. This is what a REAL "Commander in Chief" looks like
(media.patriots.win)
Comments (60)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
depth of *focus, yeah. It's a neat trick for emphasizing a subject and subduing its environment, but it kinda backfires in this setting.
It looks like this pic was taken (or chosen from a burst series) to isolate Trump and the sour puss .... iow, typical lies with selective pictures that lefty cunt photogs pull.
It could be the best he could get. Close it down but crank the ISO, get grain, crank the shutter time, get motion blur. I'd probably try everything if it were up to me, so you could be right. You don't need thousands of pictures, just the picture. Some mod thought this one was the enough to pin.
As a Nikon shooter, I can tell that this pic is from a Cannon (pushed red in either white balance or lazily so in PS .. Cannons are significantly cooler, and used by most action shooting pros) .. and any Cannon shot near Trump inside (close proximity) would be a pro camera with excellent high ISO performance.
This shot was chosen to include the sour-puss with Trump in an effort to shit on Trump ... just a guess, yes .. but I know how cameras work and I know how msm photogs work for this kind of shit narrative image.
How can you tell the red is pushed in? Asking for a layman here. (In addition to trying to make the man look bad).
I know Canon from a long time ago (GL2), but not Nikon, so I'm not up on the differences. It left much to be desired in terms of white balance in low light. Filmed some naturally lit baptisms in a rural church lobby. It was really tough keeping it looking somewhere between a chicken coop and crack-proof publish washroom blue. Are they still like that?