41
Comments (72)
sorted by:
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
2
AnotherPedeInTheWall 2 points ago +3 / -1

False, no unjust law is a law. But this nigga bout to be deported anyhow.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
AnotherPedeInTheWall 1 point ago +2 / -1

k bye

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
3
Ilikecheese 3 points ago +3 / -0

And some like the NFA need to be repealed

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
3
IceManmdm 3 points ago +4 / -1

“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” (Marbury vs. Madison, 1803.) “Every law consistent with the Constitution will have been made in pursuance of the powers granted by it. https://www.ourrepubliconline.com/Topic/27#:~:text=%E2%80%9CAll%20laws%20which%20are%20repugnant,the%20powers%20granted%20by%20it.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
-5
deleted -5 points ago +1 / -6
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
2
Camel-Toe-Harris 2 points ago +3 / -1

Unless you’re a democrat.

-5
deleted -5 points ago +1 / -6
2
IceManmdm 2 points ago +3 / -1

Not if it violates natural law.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
spotlight_inthedark 1 point ago +2 / -1

“An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” Norton v. Shelby Co., State of Tennessee, 118 U.S. 425 (1886)

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
0
spotlight_inthedark 0 points ago +1 / -1

“A law repugnant to the Constitution is void, and  courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.” - Chief Justice John Marshall [Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137 @ 176-179 (1803)]

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
1
spotlight_inthedark 1 point ago +2 / -1

“Where rights secured by Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making [i.e. so-called “Executive Orders” or “Health Orders”] or legislation which would abrogate them.” Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U. S. 436, 491 (1966)

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
1d8-1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some laws are more like suggestions.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
NancysMinge 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fact: laws only matter if they’re enforced

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
NancysMinge 1 point ago +1 / -0

In name only.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
NancysMinge 1 point ago +2 / -1

Jaqen H'ghar? Is that you?

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
AnotherPedeInTheWall 1 point ago +2 / -1

k bye

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2