It's just a generalisation or set of approximations.
I think in his example he's just basically presenting socialism as half way on the path to communism.
None of the examples are perfect but they have a very rough basis in truth.
The Nazi example would be correct in respect to their expansionism. Internally they were their own unique form of socialism which in part vaguely resembles China's partial hybridisation.
The more you go in the direction of socialism the more fascism is required.
Anarchism would be better described as you have two cows, shoot your neighbour and steal his cow.
The whole point of it is the punch line. Now you can breed the cows, now you have an entire herd of cows.
It's just a generalisation or set of approximations.
I think in his example he's just basically presenting socialism as half way on the path to communism.
None of the examples are perfect but they have a very rough basis in truth.
The Nazi example would be correct in respect to their expansionism. Internally they were their own unique form of socialism which in part vaguely resembles China's partial hybridisation.
The more you go in the direction of socialism the more fascism is required.
Anarchism would be better described as you have two cows, shoot your neighbour and steal his cow.
The whole point of it is the punch line. Now you can breed the cows, now you have an entire herd of cows.
Yeah, the only one of those ism's that gets you ahead is the last one, capitalism. The rest are all objectively bad.