1604
Comments (162)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
15
rentfREEEE_since2016 15 points ago +16 / -1

They’re not conditioning women to be attracted to this, they’re conditioning society to accept gender ambiguity. They are trying to destroy the nuclear family by destroying its functional building blocks. Ie: 2 genders, normal sexuality, strong fathers = BAD. Literally anything else = GOOD! Because it all serves the purpose of “destroying the patriarchy “

7
sun_wolf 7 points ago +7 / -0

The gays think if they swap out two genders for 36 (or 72) genders, then they will have effectively defined heterosexuality out of existence. Right now we have a few combinations: man and woman, man and man, woman and woman, and the first one - man and woman - is like 99% of the population. It is totally dominant. But with even 36 genders, what happens? Man and woman gets downgraded to Gender 18 + Gender 29, making it no more important than any other combination, like Gender 11 + Gender 35 or Gender 4 + Gender 15.

5
DrAugustBalls 5 points ago +5 / -0

Interestingly, lots of gay people have a real problem with transgenders and/or this attempted eradication of gender. They don’t think the “T” belongs with the rest of them.

Lots of lesbians are militant feminists who are pissed that everything they think they’ve fought for is being stolen by guys in drag breaking women’s world records. Gay men love men (obviously). While many of them may have more feminine traits than the average heterosexual man, they’re often attracted to hyper-masculinity.

Not trying to nitpick, but I think the transgender ideology is a thing unto itself and is starting to receive some real pushback even from the gay crowd.

1
sun_wolf 1 point ago +1 / -0

It makes a ton of sense for gays to eject the Ts. But I think a lot of them are being sucked into the power of it. They think they will be able to use the Ts as a bludgeon to destroy heterosexuality. Ironically this is more likely to destroy themselves.